On 3/15/07, Alex Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---SNIP---
Anyone else on Solaris with ScanArchive enabled having problems?
Not Solaris, but on FreeBSD 5.4 I'm finding 0.90.1 (built from the
FreeBSD ports) silently dying at random intervals, when 0.90 didn't.
I've got it running with debug
to Rob MacGregor and Gerard Seibert
Many thanks for your help!
Updating of ports has helped.
I'll watch now a urgency of ports with the help portsnap and cron
Thanks, Flanker
-
Powered by ClamAV
www.clamav.net
lamav/clamd and reinstalled the 0.90.1 rpms (DAG). When
I run freshclam I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# freshclam
ERROR: Please edit the example config file /etc/freshclam.conf.
WARNING: You must specify at least one database mirror.
This is what I have in freshclam.conf
# Uncomment
Hi,
ClamAV 0.90.1 on Solaris 10/i86 (Generic_118855-19)
We found several entries like this:
Thu Mar 15 04:59:45 2007 - Client disconnected
Thu Mar 15 04:59:50 2007 - Client disconnected
Thu Mar 15 05:00:00 2007 - Client disconnected
Thu Mar 15 05:00:02 2007 - Client disconnected
Thu Mar 15
Ooops. Strange how we always look for the complicated and forget the basic
simple things.
Bob
edit freshclam.conf and comment out the word example.
-Marco
I have removed all clamav/clamd and reinstalled the 0.90.1
rpms (DAG). When
I run freshclam I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# freshclam
Robert Isaac wrote:
Ooops. Strange how we always look for the complicated and forget the basic
simple things.
... like not to top post :)
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
Hi,
we detect some massive problems with the 0.90-series of clamav under Solaris 10,
the clamd use 90-99% of all CPU after 15min and the maschine got a load of
minimum 50.
The logfile shows like that:
Thu Mar 15 07:22:31 2007 -
/var/spool/exim/scan/1HRqqc-0002q2-MA/1HRqqc-0002q2-MA.eml: Unable
Christian Kuehn wrote:
Hi,
we detect some massive problems with the 0.90-series of clamav under Solaris 10,
the clamd use 90-99% of all CPU after 15min and the maschine got a load of
minimum 50.
The logfile shows like that:
Thu Mar 15 07:22:31 2007 -
Hi everyone,
I upgraded today and all hell broke loose- at first nothing at all was
coming through
and i was getting these errors
malware acl condition: clamd: ClamAV returned
/var/spool/exim/scan/1HRsSv-0006G8-Em: lstat() failed. ERROR
i then unistalled - cleaned - reinstalled - 3
I updated my ports and when when I install clamav it only brings me to 90_3
and upon running freshclam- it tells me to upgrade to 90.1
Why wont 90.1 install?
I did
from /usr/ports/security/clamav
make deinstall
then
make install clean
and still i wind up on 90_3
what am i missing?
bsd 5.4
On Thursday March 15, 2007 at 02:25:59 (PM) jean-paul natola wrote:
I updated my ports and when when I install clamav it only brings me to 90_3
and upon running freshclam- it tells me to upgrade to 90.1
Did you shutdown both the clamav and freshclam daemons? Try rebooting
and see it that
everything but the reboot-
the reason i'm trying to get to 90.1 is that
my mails are timing out like crazy-
My logs are slammed with
2007-03-15 14:28:21 1HRvaX-000Ksb-Q6 malware acl condition: clamd: unable to
read from socket (Operation timed out)
2007-03-15 14:28:35 1HRvPd-000BuU-MH
jean-paul natola wrote:
I updated my ports and when when I install clamav it only brings me to
90_3 and upon running freshclam- it tells me to upgrade to 90.1
http://www.freshports.org/security/clamav/
Are you sure you updated your ports? It looks to me
like you still have 90_3 in the
i did the same steps i've been doing for the last year-
cvsup
portupgrade
make deinstall
make install clean
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] cannot upgrade to 90.1
On 3/13/07 10:20 PM, Frank DeChellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/13/07 4:10 AM, Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:10:46AM -0400, Frank DeChellis wrote:
Hi there,
In case there is a NetBSD user out there...
We are using NetBSD 1.6.2 and I¹m having
On Mar 15, 2007, at 11:25 AM, jean-paul natola wrote:
I updated my ports and when when I install clamav it only brings me
to 90_3 and upon running freshclam- it tells me to upgrade to 90.1
Why wont 90.1 install?
I did
from /usr/ports/security/clamav
make deinstall
then
make install clean
From: Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] cannot upgrade to 90.1
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:46:37 -0700
On Mar 15, 2007, at 11:25 AM, jean-paul natola wrote:
I updated
Looks to me like we have similar results on our Solaris 8 system with
clamav-milter and sendmail 8.13.8. Within minutes of bringing clamav-milter
from 0.90.1 online, CPU usage and load average go through the roof, and
eventually clamav-milter dies. I just turned off ScanArchive and brought
On 3/15/07, jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I upgraded today and all hell broke loose- at first nothing at all was
coming through
and i was getting these errors
malware acl condition: clamd: ClamAV returned
/var/spool/exim/scan/1HRsSv-0006G8-Em: lstat() failed. ERROR
On 3/15/07, jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
everything but the reboot-
the reason i'm trying to get to 90.1 is that
my mails are timing out like crazy-
My logs are slammed with
2007-03-15 14:28:21 1HRvaX-000Ksb-Q6 malware acl condition: clamd: unable to
read from socket
Right, complete re-write :)
The FreeBSD port uses the following arguments to configure:
'--with-dbdir=/var/db/clamav' '--with-zlib=/usr'
'--mandir=/usr/local/man' '--disable-zlib-vcheck' '--disable-clamuko'
'--disable-clamav' '--enable-bigstack' '--disable-gethostbyname_r'
'--enable-readdir_r'
On 3/15/07, Rob MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, complete re-write :)
The FreeBSD port uses the following arguments to configure:
'--with-dbdir=/var/db/clamav' '--with-zlib=/usr'
'--mandir=/usr/local/man' '--disable-zlib-vcheck' '--disable-clamuko'
'--disable-clamav'
:
Hi everyone,
I upgraded today and all hell broke loose- at first nothing at all was
coming through
and i was getting these errors
malware acl condition: clamd: ClamAV returned
/var/spool/exim/scan/1HRsSv-0006G8-Em: lstat() failed. ERROR
Make sure that you've enabled the supplimentary
On Thursday March 15, 2007 at 04:09:50 (PM) Rob MacGregor wrote:
Further testing shows that, for FreeBSD 5.4 at least, the use of -lthr
(1:1 Threading Library) the result is instability. The second I added
that to the configure argument clamd started crashing.
Using the alternative
On Thursday March 15, 2007 at 04:09:50 (PM) Rob MacGregor wrote:
Further testing shows that, for FreeBSD 5.4 at least, the use of -lthr
(1:1 Threading Library) the result is instability. The second I added
that to the configure argument clamd started crashing.
Using the alternative
On 3/15/07, jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is this the entry you are referring to?
# Initialize supplementary group access (clamd must be started by root).
# Default: no
AllowSupplementaryGroups yes
Yes
--
Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
On 3/15/07, jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is this the entry you are referring to?
# Initialize supplementary group access (clamd must be started by root).
# Default: no
AllowSupplementaryGroups yes
Yes
Still crashing due the 5.4 incompatablilty- ANY IDEAS AT ALL-
should i
On 3/15/07, Rob MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had problems where clamd was crashing at the database reload
(check your clamd log). I've tried a fresh install of 0.90.1 and it's
still crashing.
Open a bugzilla entry, and attach clamd.log/freshclam.log (preferably
with timestamps),
On 3/15/07, jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So now that I have already upgraded to 90.1 ( on freebsd 5.4) what can I do
get this working?
As I said in my second email (that you quoted :), you need to *not*
use -lthr and use -lpthread instead. The simplest way is to modify
On 3/15/07, Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This problem has not manifested itself on my FreeBSD-6.2 machine.
Well, that in itself is good news :)
It
might very well be localized to pre-6.0 versions of FBSD. Do you have
the option of updating to the latest version of FBSD?
Not
On 3/15/07, jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So now that I have already upgraded to 90.1 ( on freebsd 5.4) what can I
do
get this working?
As I said in my second email (that you quoted :), you need to *not*
use -lthr and use -lpthread instead. The simplest way is to modify
On 3/15/07, jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is this the entry you are referring to?
# Initialize supplementary group access (clamd must be started by root).
# Default: no
AllowSupplementaryGroups yes
Yes
Still crashing due the
On 3/15/07, Alex Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:01:06 +0200 (SAST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am experiencing the same problems.
We have two quad CPU E450's running Solaris 9 handling the incomming
mail on our domains. These servers are generally
On 3/15/07, Török Edvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Open a bugzilla entry, and attach clamd.log/freshclam.log (preferably
with timestamps), providing as much detail as you can about your
environment.
An output of clamd, when having 'Foreground yes','Debug yes' in
clamd.conf could also be useful.
On Thursday March 15, 2007 at 04:50:05 (PM) jean-paul natola wrote:
So now that I have already upgraded to 90.1 ( on freebsd 5.4) what can I do
get this working?
my clam is crashing constatnly -
OK, this is untested, but you can try it anyway.
Do you have 'compat5x-i386-5.4.0.8_7 '
On 3/15/07, Christian Kuehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
ClamAV 0.90.1 on Solaris 10/i86 (Generic_118855-19)
We found several entries like this:
Thu Mar 15 04:59:45 2007 - Client disconnected
Thu Mar 15 04:59:50 2007 - Client disconnected
Thu Mar 15 05:00:00 2007 - Client disconnected
Thu Mar
From: Török Edvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] 90 disasters- revert to .88
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:10:36 +0200
On 3/15/07, jean-paul natola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 15 March 2007 01:09 pm, Rob MacGregor wrote:
On 3/15/07, Rob MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, complete re-write :)
The FreeBSD port uses the following arguments to configure:
'--with-dbdir=/var/db/clamav' '--with-zlib=/usr'
'--mandir=/usr/local/man'
On 3/15/07, Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libthr is only really usable on FreeBSD 6+. You'll need to upgrade if you
want to use that.
Yeah, so I've found. Unfortunately the port maintainer obviously only
uses 6.x (which isn't really a surprise).
ClamAV 0.90.x is really only usable
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:54:38 -0700
Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal opinion is that clamd is self-refreshing the databases at
the instant a new database is being installed. If so then it may be a
worthwhile thing to have a semaphore available as a socket query or
as an
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:29:32 -0500
Alex Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:54:38 -0700
Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal opinion is that clamd is self-refreshing the databases at
the instant a new database is being installed. If so then it may be a
Dana Kashubeck wrote:
I am not able to compile the latest stable version on Mac OS X Server
10.3. There are a few different warnings here and there, most of them
are shown while compiling unrar.c:
...
The compile ends with:
/usr/bin/libtool: no library created (no object files in input
- And the clamav log is free of errors and indicated that the database is
updated appropriately and clamd is being notified of changes.
OK, clamav is finding viruses again, but they are not being LOGGED in
/var/log/clamav.log. The database upgrades and any restarts ARE being
logged - just
No problems here with 10.4.8 on Intel.
Just standard compile with experimental.
James.
On 16/03/2007, at 10:04 AM, John Rudd wrote:
Dana Kashubeck wrote:
I am not able to compile the latest stable version on Mac OS X
Server 10.3. There are a few different warnings here and there,
most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John Rudd wrote:
[snip]
Yup, same exact problem.
I notice no one replied to your question. Did you get it resolved?
Seems like, from reading this list, so far ClamAV 0.90.* is pretty much
a disaster. I don't think I'm aware of anyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alex Moore wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:54:38 -0700
Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal opinion is that clamd is self-refreshing the databases at
the instant a new database is being installed. If so then it may be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alex Moore wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:01:06 +0200 (SAST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am experiencing the same problems.
We have two quad CPU E450's running Solaris 9 handling the incomming
mail on our domains. These
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
Dana Kashubeck wrote:
I am not able to compile the latest stable version on Mac OS X
Server 10.3. There are a few different warnings here and there,
most of them are shown while compiling unrar.c:
...
The compile ends with:
On 3/15/07 7:04 PM, John Rudd wrote:
Dana Kashubeck wrote:
I am not able to compile the latest stable version on Mac OS X Server
10.3. There are a few different warnings here and there, most of them
are shown while compiling unrar.c:
...
The compile ends with:
/usr/bin/libtool: no library
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
Seems like, from reading this list, so far ClamAV 0.90.* is pretty
much a disaster. I don't think I'm aware of anyone having a smooth
experience with it.
Can anyone out there contradict that? Especially on Mac OS X 10.3.9
On Mar 15, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Dana Kashubeck wrote:
On 3/15/07 7:04 PM, John Rudd wrote:
Seems like, from reading this list, so far ClamAV 0.90.* is pretty
much a disaster. I don't think I'm aware of anyone having a
smooth experience with it.
Yeah, those were my thoughts, too. On the
On 3/15/07 8:33 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Dana Kashubeck wrote:
On 3/15/07 7:04 PM, John Rudd wrote:
Seems like, from reading this list, so far ClamAV 0.90.* is pretty
much a disaster. I don't think I'm aware of anyone having a smooth
experience with it.
Yeah,
John Fleming wrote:
- And the clamav log is free of errors and indicated that the
database is updated appropriately and clamd is being notified of
changes.
OK, clamav is finding viruses again, but they are not being LOGGED in
/var/log/clamav.log. The database upgrades and any restarts ARE
René Berber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alex Moore wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:01:06 +0200 (SAST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am experiencing the same problems.
We have two quad CPU E450's running Solaris 9 handling the incomming
mail on our
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 not
findingviruses
John Fleming wrote:
- And the clamav log is
- Original Message -
From: John Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1
notfindingviruses
- Original Message -
From: Dennis
John Fleming wrote:
If not syslog, then the the clamd run-as user have write permissions
to the log?
Yes, clamav:clamav both owner and group 0640
Just saw your next post come in - check for sure the run-as user is clamav.
Is the log 2gig in size?
Yeah, only about 5K right now.
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: ClamAV not LOGGING viruses was [Clamav-users] 0.90.1not
findingviruses
John Fleming wrote:
If not syslog, then the
John Fleming wrote:
clamd 22702clamav3w REG3,1 53702682197
/var/log/clamav/clamav.log
There's the log, but I need help understanding what's happening. - John
That's not where you were describing the log to be earlier. Your
original post said
- Original Message -
From: aCaB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] New freshclam error
Robert Isaac wrote:
Ooops. Strange how we always look for the complicated and forget the
basic
60 matches
Mail list logo
