On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:05:57 -0700
Jim Preston articulated:
>
>
> On 02/28/2011 08:56 PM, Nathan Gibbs wrote:
> > It personally wouldn't matter to me as I am running 0.97 on my
> > servers. So why am I fussing?
> >
> > Last April when 0.96 was rolled out, some of out servers couldn't
> > be upg
On 02/28/2011 09:39 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 2/28/2011 10:03 AM, Royce Williams wrote:
For future-proofing purposes, would it be feasible to enable
optionally tagging a signature with its minimum supported ClamAV
version?
In other words, the entry is tagged with "min 0.98.2", and if you're
On 02/28/2011 08:56 PM, Nathan Gibbs wrote:
It personally wouldn't matter to me as I am running 0.97 on my servers.
So why am I fussing?
Last April when 0.96 was rolled out, some of out servers couldn't be upgraded.
Fortunately, by August the ClamAV Team fixed whatever was broken in the firs
On 03/01/2011 12:59 AM, Simon Hobson wrote:
Thats an unsafe question to answer.
No matter how its answered, you shoot yourself in the foot.
Its like "Have you quit beating your wife?"
Yes - You were beating her.
No - You are beating her.
Yes, that is why you say you have just reduced the b
