On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:48 AM, Kees Theunissen
wrote:
>>I have not had much luck finding a binary package that is not part of
>>a non Slackware install. If anyone finds such a package in their
>>travels I would be very grateful for a link.
>
> Have a look at https://slackbuilds.org/ for build
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> point was that there are binary packages which working fine all over
> distributions
I have not had much luck finding a binary package that is not part of
a non Slackware install. If anyone finds such a package in their
travel
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:35 AM, SCOTT PACKARD
wrote:
> Bill S -
> I found it confusing also; I've only gone through the website's downloads
> verbiage.
>
> I was able to find these -4 versions by Googling on the full package name.
> Once I found one, I saw I could go
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.02.2018 um 14:51 schrieb Bill S:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> why not use distribution packages whci seems to can handel the issues
>>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> you post is crap because you don't point to any refereneces (url to said
> patch and son on) nor talking what is a "newer GCC" in your point of view
> and especially in the context of the problem
My apologies. I had been following posts ri
I think there was a patch issued over a week ago for the problem
0.99.3 has with newer versions of GCC. Based on that I have two
questions.
1. Will version 0.99.3 ever be revised so you do not have to use the patch?
2. If the answer to question 1 is “No”, what are the pros and cons of
staying w