-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Antony
Stone
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Question regarding virus detection
On Thursday 20 May 2004 9:13 pm, Jim Maul wrote:
Exactly
Hello,
For the first time since installing clamav on our mail server over 6 months
ago, we have had a virus get through. It was picked up on the users desktop
by Symantec corporate AV as Netsky.P. I did some research and this is what
i have found:
First of all, i do not have the message in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Maul
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 12:20 PM
To: ClamAV Mailing List
Subject: [Clamav-users] Question regarding virus detection
Hello,
For the first time since installing clamav on our mail server
Jim Maul wrote:
There is something that is causing clamav to not be able to detect this
virus after the message has been bounced and now forwarded.
Damaged bounces are not dangerous. Why bother making signatures for them
when you don't make money showing how many viruses you detect?
--
/Peter
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 19:21, Peter Bonivart wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
There is something that is causing clamav to not be able to detect this
virus after the message has been bounced and now forwarded.
Damaged bounces are not dangerous. Why bother making signatures for them
when you don't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter
Bonivart
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Question regarding virus detection
Jim Maul wrote:
There is something that is causing clamav
On Thursday 20 May 2004 7:21 pm, Peter Bonivart wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
There is something that is causing clamav to not be able to detect this
virus after the message has been bounced and now forwarded.
Damaged bounces are not dangerous. Why bother making signatures for them
when you
On Thursday 20 May 2004 7:50 pm, Jim Maul wrote:
There is something that is causing clamav to not be able to detect this
virus after the message has been bounced and now forwarded.
Damaged bounces are not dangerous. Why bother making signatures for them
when you don't make money
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Antony
Stone
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Question regarding virus detection
On Thursday 20 May 2004 7:21 pm, Peter Bonivart wrote:
Jim
On Thursday 20 May 2004 9:13 pm, Jim Maul wrote:
Exactly, and after some more playing around, i found that i dont even have
to remove ALL of those lines. I can leave them all in except the first
line which was -Original Message-
If i remove that line, clamscan finds the virus in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
