Hi,
I'm using Exim4, Courier and clamav.
Clamav works fine on my server.
When an infected message is detected, clamav removes it and sends a report
to the sender.
Is it possible to inform the recipient about the rejected mail?
Thanks in advance,
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Exim4, Courier and clamav.
Clamav works fine on my server.
When an infected message is detected, clamav removes it and sends a report
to the sender.
Is it possible to inform the recipient about the rejected mail?
Yes it is possible, but clamav doesnt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
snip
|
| This is a bad behaviour. You're bothering innocent people (email worms
| falsify senders).
|
Try to reject emails at least after DATA in SMTP trasaction.
|
|Is it possible to inform the recipient about the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi,
I'm using Exim4, Courier and clamav.
Clamav works fine on my server.
When an infected message is detected, clamav removes it and sends a report
to the sender.
You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
to believe it is going to the
You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
Hi, you got a mail from so and so, but it had a virus, so I deleted it. If
you're
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
Hi, you got a mail from so and
On Thursday 05 January 2006 08:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
Hi, you got a mail from so
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:44 -0800, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 January 2006 08:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
Still probably bad form, as you'd be spamming the living daylights out of
the poor recipient.
this is why you simply reject (5xx) the message at the gates.
And then they send
On Thursday 05 January 2006 09:49, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:44 -0800, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 January 2006 08:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
Still probably bad form, as you'd be spamming the living daylights out
of the poor recipient.
this is why you
IMHO the strongest argument for 1) is the innocent bystander analogy.
Suppose you're manning a post office counter. A young man with his head
shaved and Fight the Power tattoos hands you a ticking package with
grease stains. He keeps looking over his shoulder. The return address on
the
On Thursday 05 January 2006 10:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any legitimate MTA treating a 5xx response as a I won't take it, but
try my backup MXs should be shot, along with the author(s) and the
operator(s).
This is an undecidable question. There are legitimate arguments for both
sides:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 05 January 2006 10:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any legitimate MTA treating a 5xx response as a I won't take it,
but try my backup MXs should be shot, along with the author(s) and
the operator(s).
This is an undecidable question. There are legitimate
Shayne Lebrun said:
You have no idea where the report is going. You certainly have no reason
to believe it is going to the sender. You should disable this feature.
Sounds like he wants to inform the recipient, not the sender.
He does - I chose to address the greater stupidity.
dp
Mike Jackson wrote:
IMHO the strongest argument for 1) is the innocent bystander analogy.
Suppose you're manning a post office counter. A young man with his
head shaved and Fight the Power tattoos hands you a ticking package
with grease stains. He keeps looking over his shoulder. The
At 03:31 PM 1/5/2006, Dale Lists wrote:
[some political ramblings]
this is the clamav.net list. i get enough political diatribes in
the newspaper
magazines
on television
on the radio
in email
on assorted websites
in IM
from my mother
from my brothers
from friends
from acquaintances
let's keep
On Thursday 05 January 2006 17:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is the clamav.net list. i get enough political diatribes in
the newspaper
magazines
on television
on the radio
in email
on assorted websites
in IM
from my mother
from my brothers
from friends
from acquaintances
let's
16 matches
Mail list logo
