On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:17:56 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood wrote:
In a 'PS' footnote in my original post I merely asked another poster
to be considerate to me, and not to include my email address in the
body of his message.
I've now changed my reply template to accommodate you, I will add that
I
Hi there,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Al Varnell wrote:
... my understanding of what he's asking now is that the list
server remove any addresses that their client includes.
For the sake of clarity, I did not ask that. I also did not ask for
policy changes at Sourcefire, nor did I ask anyone to
On Sep 25, 2012, at 6:17 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Al Varnell wrote:
... my understanding of what he's asking now is that the list
server remove any addresses that their client includes.
For the sake of clarity, I did not ask that. I also did not ask for
policy changes
Hi there,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Joel Esler wrote:
Maybe you are talking about something I'm not aware of.
This is standard mailing list etiquette going back, I guess, almost a
couple of decades and I'm both surprised and disappointed to have to
go over it here.
But by the pure fact that you
B0;261;0cHi there,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Joel Esler wrote:
My point being that we have a bug open on it, we're working on it,
so continuing trying to argue the point is pointless. ...
Ah, yes, I think we are at crossed purposes here. I'm not trying to
convince you to act on the enhancement
On Sep 24, 2012, at 7:23 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Joel Esler wrote:
Maybe you are talking about something I'm not aware of.
This is standard mailing list etiquette going back, I guess, almost a
couple of decades and I'm both surprised and disappointed to
On 9/24/12 8:41 AM, Joel Esler wrote:
On Sep 24, 2012, at 7:23 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, Joel Esler wrote:
Maybe you are talking about something I'm not aware of.
This is standard mailing list etiquette going back, I guess, almost a
couple of decades
Hi--
On Sep 24, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Al Varnell wrote:
[ ... ]
I agree that trying to force people to do so would be a loosing battle and
not worth the effort. I subscribe to many lists and must say that this is
the first time I've read such a request. But my understanding of what he's
asking
Hello again,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:50:10 +0100 (BST) G.W. Haywood wrote:
PS Please don't mail somebody's email address to the whole world.
It's in the list headers, it's already been made public...
Flame wars aren't going to get us anywhere. I
On Sep 23, 2012, at 6:47 AM, G.W. Haywood g...@jubileegroup.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:50:10 +0100 (BST) G.W. Haywood wrote:
PS Please don't mail somebody's email address to the whole world.
It's in the list headers, it's already been
On Sep 22, 2012, at 9:50 AM, G.W. Haywood g...@jubileegroup.co.uk wrote:
Mr. Esler's assertion that this is a pedantic argument, given his
position, bothers me a little.
My point being that we have a bug open on it, we're working on it, so
continuing trying to argue the point is pointless.
Joel Esler skrev den 23-09-2012 17:59:
So maybe we are confused about what you are talking about, or
perhaps you are.
is default reply template in Apple Mail to blame ?
just becurse its common it not the same as its common good idear
dont post my email with Apple Mail
respect that i dont do
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:50:10 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood somebl...@somewhere.or.other wrote:
PS Please don't mail somebody's email address to the whole world.
It's in the list headers, it's already been made public on the list
and in the archives.
--
Brian Morrison
I am not
Brian Morrison skrev den 2012-09-22 16:52:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:50:10 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood somebl...@somewhere.or.other wrote:
PS Please don't mail somebody's email address to the whole world.
It's in the list headers, it's already been made public on the list
and in the archives.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:02:40 +0200
Benny Pedersen x wrote:
if you post your own i will reply with it non hidded
Be my guest, my email address has been public for many years without
problems.
--
Brian Morrison
I am not young enough to know everything
On 9/20/12 9:12 AM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
On 9/18/2012 6:24 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
http://blog.clamav.net/2012/09/clamav-stats-we-need-more-of-them-we.html
ClamAV Stats, we need more of them, we need your help
We've been working pretty hard behind the scenes over here on
Hi there,
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-09-20 12:42, G.W. Haywood skrev:
option which disables the bytecode interpreter. ...
it can be disabled in freshclam.conf
No, that disables loading bytecode. The interpreter is still there.
so this is a problem ?
Yes.
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:31:59 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood g...@jubileegroup.co.uk wrote:
If a compiler is not there it is *impossible* for it to do anything,
and that statement does not rely on your opinion.
It isn't Ken Thompson's opinion, it isn't necessary for a compiler to
exist for malicious
On 9/21/2012 4:35 AM, Al Varnell wrote:
On 9/20/12 9:12 AM, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote:
On 9/18/2012 6:24 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
http://blog.clamav.net/2012/09/clamav-stats-we-need-more-of-them-we.html
ClamAV Stats, we need more of them, we need your help
We've been working
Now that I have the submission working, I took a look at the personal
stats page (www.stats.clamav.net). I see a graph of some data here, but
I'm not sure how to read it.
There is a bar chart with four bars. The numbers on the bars are 5, 1,
4, 2. When I hover over the bars, I get 19, 21,
As pedantic as this argument is, I understand both sides of the argument.
We have a bug in the system now, and we'll start triaging what it would
take to make that happen.
Thanks.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Brian Morrison b...@fenrir.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:31:59 +0100
Hi there,
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Joel Esler wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 7:21 AM, G.W. Haywood g...@jubileegroup.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Joel Esler wrote:
... I'm unhappy with the bytecode interpreter ...
Okay, have you opened a feature request bug in our bugzilla tracking
system so
Hi there,
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-09-19 13:21, G.W. Haywood skrev:
option which disables the bytecode interpreter. ...
it can be disabled in freshclam.conf
No, that disables loading bytecode. The interpreter is still there.
--
73,
Ged.
Den 2012-09-20 12:42, G.W. Haywood skrev:
option which disables the bytecode interpreter. ...
it can be disabled in freshclam.conf
No, that disables loading bytecode. The interpreter is still there.
so this is a problem ?
without signatures it does nothing imho
On 9/18/2012 6:24 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
http://blog.clamav.net/2012/09/clamav-stats-we-need-more-of-them-we.html
ClamAV Stats, we need more of them, we need your help
We've been working pretty hard behind the scenes over here on ClamAV, its
backend infrastructure, and moving the codebase as
Hi there,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Joel Esler wrote:
In order for us to get some accurate statistics about what you all
are seeing out there, in the field, we need as many people as
possible to opt-in to some statistics gathering features that we
have built into the code base.
I'd be happy to
Den 2012-09-19 13:21, G.W. Haywood skrev:
I'd be happy to get up to date and let you have some *interesting*
statistics if you could just see your way to including a compile-time
option which disables the bytecode interpreter. Mr. Skoll and I
asked
about this over two years ago:
it can be
On Sep 19, 2012, at 7:21 AM, G.W. Haywood g...@jubileegroup.co.uk wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Joel Esler wrote:
In order for us to get some accurate statistics about what you all
are seeing out there, in the field, we need as many people as
possible to opt-in to some statistics
http://blog.clamav.net/2012/09/clamav-stats-we-need-more-of-them-we.html
ClamAV Stats, we need more of them, we need your help
We've been working pretty hard behind the scenes over here on ClamAV, its
backend infrastructure, and moving the codebase as well as its detection up the
ladder.
In
29 matches
Mail list logo
