Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-26 Thread Bill Maidment
Jim Maul wrote: Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont seem to realize this. Jim Perhaps it should to avoid any confusion! Bill

RE: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-27 Thread Jim Maul
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill > Maidment > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 6:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan > > > Jim Maul wrote: &g

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-27 Thread Dave Ewart
On Tuesday, 27.04.2004 at 09:38 -0400, Jim Maul wrote: > > >Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont > > >seem to realize this. > > > > Perhaps it should to avoid any confusion! > > Perhaps, but this is not my decision. /etc/clamav.conf -> /etc/clamd.conf ? Dave. -- Da

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-27 Thread Matt
> > > >Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont > > > >seem to realize this. > > > > > > Perhaps it should to avoid any confusion! > > > > Perhaps, but this is not my decision. > > /etc/clamav.conf -> /etc/clamd.conf ? > The whole purpose of clamscan is to be a comma

RE: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-27 Thread Jim Maul
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Ewart > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan > > > On Tuesday, 27.04.2004 at

RE: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-27 Thread Jim Maul
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan > > > > > > > > >Bec

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-27 Thread Joe Maimon
Jim Maul wrote: Exactly. I never said clamscan should use clamav.conf. I simply stated that since clamd/clamdscan (and optionally freshclam as well) are the only programs to use clamav.conf, clamav-milter references it as well. ---

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-27 Thread Matt
> > > > Exactly. I never said clamscan should use clamav.conf. I simply stated > that since clamd/clamdscan (and optionally freshclam as well) are the only > programs to use clamav.conf, perhaps it would avoid some confusion if it > were to be called clamd.conf. > > Jim Hello again, My prev

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-27 Thread Bill Maidment
Jim Maul wrote: Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont seem to realize this. Perhaps it should to avoid any confusion! Perhaps, but this is not my decision. /etc/clamav.conf -> /etc/clamd.conf ? The whole purpose of clamscan is

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:20:03 +1000 Bill Maidment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My point is that if we could make the names of the processes more > distinguishable and match the conf files (if any) then we remove the > chance of error. For example clamscan could be renamed to scanclam > (with NO s

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-28 Thread Eric Wieling
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 14:40, Stephen Gran wrote: > > What DOES read clamav.conf? > > clamd, clamdscan, and clamav-milter. freshclam also looks at it to find > out how to notify clamd if you have it set to notify clamd after updates. > It _is_ in the various docs, you know :) The RPM I'm using ha

RE: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-28 Thread Jim Maul
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Maimon > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 5:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan > >

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-23 Thread Stephen Gran
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:00:43PM -0500, Eric Wieling said: > I'm having a problem where clamscan does not detect an encrypted .zip > file, but clamdscan does. Does anyone have any suggestions? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# /usr/bin/clamdscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i bob.zip > /tmp/bob.zip: Encrypted.

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-23 Thread Eric Wieling
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote: > use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip Any idea why the config file setting to enable blocking encrypted files is not working? --Eric -- Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111 "In a related st

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-23 Thread Robert Blayzor
Eric Wieling wrote: On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote: use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip Any idea why the config file setting to enable blocking encrypted files is not working? I may be wrong in my thinking but clamdscan and clamscan are not real

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-23 Thread Stephen Gran
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Eric Wieling said: > On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote: > > use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip > > Any idea why the config file setting to enable blocking encrypted files > is not working? Because clamscan d

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-23 Thread Eric Wieling
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 10:47, Stephen Gran wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Eric Wieling said: > > On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip > > > > Any idea why the config file setting to enable blo

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-23 Thread Stephen Gran
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 12:23:31PM -0500, Eric Wieling said: > On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 10:47, Stephen Gran wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Eric Wieling said: > > > On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > > use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypte

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with clamscan .vs. clamdscan

2004-04-24 Thread Jim Maul
> On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 08:40, Stephen Gran wrote: >> use /usr/bin/clamscan --tempdir=/tmp -r -i --block-encrypted bob.zip > > Any idea why the config file setting to enable blocking encrypted files > is not working? > Because clamscan doesnt use clamav.conf!! S many people dont seem to reali