Dennis Peterson wrote:
Christoph Cordes wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible
to answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for
this particular problem if the article is to be believed.
So you want to know
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Christoph Cordes wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible
to answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for
this particular problem if the article is to be believed.
So you want
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:29:20AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
That's not the question. The question as asked by management is Why
does ClamAV report it doesn't catch this virus while these others do?
and my answer is I don't know - and the ClamAV people don't know,
either.
For this
Dennis Peterson wrote:
I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible to
answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for this
particular problem if the article is to be believed.
So you want to know if the ClamAV Team monitors an infected system to
get hands
Christoph Cordes wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible to
answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for this
particular problem if the article is to be believed.
So you want to know if the ClamAV Team monitors an
Pretty scary!
FB
2006/10/20, Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a bit
worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon - any
words of wisdom I can
Dennis Peterson wrote:
http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a bit
worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon - any
words of wisdom I can share regarding the ClamAV tools?
dp
Not
Dennis Peterson wrote:
http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a
bit
worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon -
any
words of wisdom I can share regarding the ClamAV
At 05:50 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found'
response next to clamav is a bit
worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to
ask about it soon - any
words of
On Fri, October 20, 2006 4:50 pm, Noel Jones wrote:
At 05:50 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
It is a morphing problem so the question is, is ClamAV
moving with it? I don't know and thought it worth asking. I still
don't know.
Most likely no one had submitted a sample of that virus
Noel Jones wrote:
At 05:50 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to
clamav is a bit
worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it
At 10:54 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
It is a morphing problem so the question is, is ClamAV
moving with it? I don't know and thought it worth asking.
I still don't know.
Apparently you don't know either, so please make the soap
box available to another who may have the answer.
Noel Jones wrote:
At 10:54 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
It is a morphing problem so the question is, is ClamAV moving with
it? I don't know and thought it worth asking. I still don't know.
Apparently you don't know either, so please make the soap box
available to another who may
13 matches
Mail list logo
