Re: [cp-patches] Patch JCL_realloc()] (late, because accidently sent to wrong address)

2004-11-16 Thread Torsten Rupp
Dear Brian, (and I thought we agreed to get rid of these kind of macros and would use normal functions as much as possible in the future.) When I remember right, the agreement was not to remove the macros completely, but instead make them into alias-names for target specific implementations of

Re: [cp-patches] Patch JCL_realloc()] (late, because accidently sent to wrong address)

2004-11-16 Thread Michael Koch
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 10:46 schrieb Torsten Rupp: Dear Brian, (and I thought we agreed to get rid of these kind of macros and would use normal functions as much as possible in the future.) When I remember right, the agreement was not to remove the macros completely, but instead

Re: [cp-patches] Patch JCL_realloc()] (late, because accidently sent to wrong address)

2004-11-15 Thread Dr. Torsten Rupp
Dear Mark, * native/jni/classpath/jcl.h, native/jni/classpath/jcl.c, native/jni/java-io/java_io_VMFile.c: Inserted native layer macros for OS functions, added parameter for old memory size to JCL_realloc() to be able to make an malloc() on system where no

Re: [cp-patches] Patch JCL_realloc()] (late, because accidently sent to wrong address)

2004-11-15 Thread C. Brian Jones
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 05:44, Dr. Torsten Rupp wrote: Dear Mark, (and I thought we agreed to get rid of these kind of macros and would use normal functions as much as possible in the future.) When I remember right, the agreement was not to remove the macros completely, but instead make