Ok, Thanks!
> Hi David,
>
>> I tried it just now, and your fix works with the new patch, as the
>> implied
>> tag is now recognized as a HTML.Tag.IMPLIED Tag! So the implied tags for
>> CP and the RI behave the same now!
>
> Very good. I checked in your patch (attached again).
>
> 2006-11-10 Davi
Hi David,
> I tried it just now, and your fix works with the new patch, as the implied
> tag is now recognized as a HTML.Tag.IMPLIED Tag! So the implied tags for
> CP and the RI behave the same now!
Very good. I checked in your patch (attached again).
2006-11-10 David Fu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Roman,
I tried it just now, and your fix works with the new patch, as the implied
tag is now recognized as a HTML.Tag.IMPLIED Tag! So the implied tags for
CP and the RI behave the same now!
David Fu.
> Hi David,
>
> Am Freitag, den
Hi David,
Am Freitag, den 10.11.2006, 17:16 +0900 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi Roman,
> Can you commit this patch after you fix p-implied? This patch removes all
> the CP specific sections. Thanks!
Sure. Can you tell me what is different in Classpath ATM? I think I
still don't understand compl
Hi Roman,
Can you commit this patch after you fix p-implied? This patch removes all
the CP specific sections. Thanks!
David Fu.
> Hi David,
>
>> Thanks for checking the file in! The IMPLIED tag in the RI is
>> implemented
>> as a Tag w
Hi David,
> Thanks for checking the file in! The IMPLIED tag in the RI is implemented
> as a Tag with a NameAttribute of HTML.Tag.IMPLIED. GNU CP
> implements it as a Tag with a NameAttribute of HTML.Tag.P, with a tag
> attribute of _implied_="true".
We should fix that. It sounds easy enough.
Hi Roman,
Thanks for checking the file in! The IMPLIED tag in the RI is implemented
as a Tag with a NameAttribute of HTML.Tag.IMPLIED. GNU CP
implements it as a Tag with a NameAttribute of HTML.Tag.P, with a tag
attribute of _implied_="true". The other difference is that since the RI
is using HTM
Hi all,
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:39 +0100, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > > I have fixed the formatting, added comments and also finished up the
> > > incomplete parts. Hope this passes the muster :)
> >
> > Looks good to me. I have included it in my local tree and finished it up
> > for committing (S
Hi Roman,
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 17:39 +0100, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > I have fixed the formatting, added comments and also finished up the
> > incomplete parts. Hope this passes the muster :)
>
> Looks good to me. I have included it in my local tree and finished it up
> for committing (Some more f
Hi David,
> I have fixed the formatting, added comments and also finished up the
> incomplete parts. Hope this passes the muster :)
Looks good to me. I have included it in my local tree and finished it up
for committing (Some more formatting etc). I'd like to talk back to Mark
before anyhow.
You
Hi Roman, all,
I have fixed the formatting, added comments and also finished up the
incomplete parts. Hope this passes the muster :)
David Fu./* HTMLWriter.java --
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part o
Hi Roman, Tom,
The paperwork is already done(handled by Mark), so I should be ok. I will
try to finish the formating and commenting this weekend. Mark's probably
having a great time in Colorado right now :)
David Fu.
> Hi David,
>
>> I
Hi David,
> I have tested it with Blackdown JDK 1.4.2, and JamVM 1.4.2 + GNU Classpath
> 0.92. The output formatting(indent and newlines) is tricky, but I tried to
> keep as close to the RI as possible. CP 0.92 does not have all the tags
> yet, but looks to be ok. I have not tried Mauve/testlets b
Hi Roman, Audrius,
I have tested it with Blackdown JDK 1.4.2, and JamVM 1.4.2 + GNU Classpath
0.92. The output formatting(indent and newlines) is tricky, but I tried to
keep as close to the RI as possible. CP 0.92 does not have all the tags
yet, but looks to be ok. I have not tried Mauve/testlets b
Ho, David!
Congratulations, we were waiting for this class for a long time! The
most important is now to have a little bit of tests for the new class.
It may be that your tests only pass with Sun's jre and not with ours -
does not matter anyway, just convert into testlets (a piece of cake to
Hi Fu,
> Hi Mark,
> Just finished javax.swing.text.html.HTMLWriter, can you commit it for me?
> Thanks! ;)
The code looks good. Maybe you could fix the following points, then it
would be even better:
- Add (extensive ;-) ) comments to the class and to each method/field
etc. This makes the code mo
Hi Mark,
Just finished javax.swing.text.html.HTMLWriter, can you commit it for me?
Thanks! ;)
David Fu./* HTMLWriter.java --
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of GNU Classpath.
GNU Classpath is
17 matches
Mail list logo
