On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:11:51 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev
wrote:
> There is an issue displaying the xembed icons in the appIndicators area which
> are not displayed correctly with certain Gnome Shell versions.
> It was already fixed
> [externally](https://gitlab.gnome.org/3v1n0/gnome-shell/-/comm
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 03:35:17 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> Somehow the automated test is not working flawless in windows and mac. In
>> windows the image is getting stuck at center of white frame when its made
>> automatic and in mac CI machines are failing even though the white screen is
>>
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 03:29:39 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>>> Latest comment from Phil related to not disabling SystemTray for Gnome>=45
>>> needs to be taken care.
>>
>> With the current version string format, this should not happen unless the
>> executable is somewhere else, environment variables a
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:11:51 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev
wrote:
> There is an issue displaying the xembed icons in the appIndicators area which
> are not displayed correctly with certain Gnome Shell versions.
> It was already fixed
> [externally](https://gitlab.gnome.org/3v1n0/gnome-shell/-/comm
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 08:09:20 GMT, Tejesh R wrote:
>> Since the fix was done for linux alone, I have restricted the test to it.
>> Anyhow it works on windows and mac.
>
> Somehow the automated test is not working flawless in windows and mac. In
> windows the image is getting stuck at center of wh
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 03:26:54 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev
wrote:
>> A fair question. My understanding of how Gnome vs Gnome Shell vs GTK version
>> naming interact here is definitely not as clear as I'd like but I understand
>> anything that is Gnome 3.X or 40+ (and < 44.1) is affected, leaving o
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 03:13:05 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Latest comment from Phil related to not disabling SystemTray for Gnome>=45
>> needs to be taken care.
>> Also do we need to worry about this issue being regression from some Gnome
>> version like 3.38.0 and we need to disable SystemTray only
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 02:58:45 GMT, Jayathirth D V wrote:
>> And in fact we need to be VERY careful that we don't turn the existing code
>> reporting "available == false" into "true" due to us simply detecting Gnome
>> >= 45 .. that would be unfortunate.
>
> Latest comment from Phil related to no
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 02:20:51 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> If we do that we could be up to 99.5% of cases aren't affected.
>
> And in fact we need to be VERY careful that we don't turn the existing code
> reporting "available == false" into "true" due to us simply detecting Gnome
> >= 45 .. that wou
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 02:10:59 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>>> (arm-waving alert) 99% of apps don't do it at all,
>>
>> That may not be so arm-wavy actually considering this has been a problem for
>> a while and we haven't exactly been inundated with complaints, especially
>> since on RH & (I think) F
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:59:48 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/awt/UNIXToolkit.java line 286:
>>
>>> 284: try {
>>> 285: Process process =
>>> 286: new ProcessBuilder("/usr/bin/gnome-shell", "--version")
>>
>> How it will affect perfo
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 02:10:23 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> According to my tests, the call to `getGnomeShellMajorVersion()` took about
>> 25-35 ms on average, but it is a one-time task.
>
>> (arm-waving alert) 99% of apps don't do it at all,
>
> That may not be so arm-wavy actually considering this
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 02:10:22 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev
wrote:
>> Well, clearly the exec will take some non-zero time, but this part of
>> initialising the SystemTray only happens once and (arm-waving alert) 99% of
>> apps don't do it at all, so I don't see it as a major problem and it needs
>
On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 12:31:16 GMT, Jiří Vaněk wrote:
> added workarounds so freshly built jdk can set its necessary source/taret
> without touching ant/makefile. In addition it can set itself as
> compiler/runner without putting itself on path.
Marked as reviewed by serb (Reviewer).
---
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 20:17:06 GMT, Jiří Vaněk wrote:
>Also, I'm not saying to bump source/target to something drastic like 20 or so,
>I originally prosed 8 - which is the oldest live openjdk anyway. However
>(unless something unexpected comes form
>https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8323169) w
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:41:49 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> There is an issue displaying the xembed icons in the appIndicators area
>> which are not displayed correctly with certain Gnome Shell versions.
>> It was already fixed
>> [externally](https://gitlab.gnome.org/3v1n0/gnome-shell/-/commit
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:11:51 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev
wrote:
> There is an issue displaying the xembed icons in the appIndicators area which
> are not displayed correctly with certain Gnome Shell versions.
> It was already fixed
> [externally](https://gitlab.gnome.org/3v1n0/gnome-shell/-/comm
There is an issue displaying the xembed icons in the appIndicators area which
are not displayed correctly with certain Gnome Shell versions.
It was already fixed
[externally](https://gitlab.gnome.org/3v1n0/gnome-shell/-/commit/20a81d786697f40880e81d867453b1bad9524ec1).
However this is still a bl
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:22:48 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This enhancement adds three methods to `PassFailJFrame.Builder`:
>
> 1. **`splitUIRight`** to display test UI to the right of the instructions;
> 2. **`splitUIBottom`** to display test UI to the bottom of the instructions;
> 3. `splitUI`:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:11:42 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/awt/regtesthelpers/PassFailJFrame.java line 1229:
>>
>>> 1227: * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {panelCreator} is
>>> {@code null}
>>> 1228: */
>>> 1229: public Builder splitUI(PanelCreator pa
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:06:15 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> The `test/jdk/java/awt/print/PrinterJob/PrintLatinCJKTest.java` displays a
>> single *Print* button as its test UI. To simplify the UI, I used the new
>> `splitUI` method from #17845.
>>
>> In addition to it, I refactored the test:
>>
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:06:15 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> The `test/jdk/java/awt/print/PrinterJob/PrintLatinCJKTest.java` displays a
>> single *Print* button as its test UI. To simplify the UI, I used the new
>> `splitUI` method from #17845.
>>
>> In addition to it, I refactored the test:
>>
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:52:12 GMT, vtstydev wrote:
>> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,
>> PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows
>> platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
>
> vtstydev has
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:47:30 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
>> test/jdk/javax/swing/JTabbedPane/TabbedPaneNPECheck.java line 56:
>>
>>> 54: SwingUtilities.invokeAndWait(me::test);
>>> 55: } finally {
>>> 56: if (mainFrame != null) {
>>
>> should be disposed on EDT.
>
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:50:34 GMT, Alexander Zuev wrote:
>> Add null check for the Aqua LnF situation when tab is hidden die to the tabs
>> overflow.
>
> Alexander Zuev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Moved frame disposal to
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 06:58:15 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>> Alexander Zuev has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fixing some coding style related issues
>
> test/jdk/javax/swing/JTabbedPane/TabbedPaneNPECheck.java line 56:
>
>>
> Add null check for the Aqua LnF situation when tab is hidden die to the tabs
> overflow.
Alexander Zuev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Moved frame disposal to the EDT
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jd
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:47:55 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>> This enhancement adds three methods to `PassFailJFrame.Builder`:
>>
>> 1. **`splitUIRight`** to display test UI to the right of the instructions;
>> 2. **`splitUIBottom`** to display test UI to the bottom of the instructions;
>> 3. `spl
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:22:48 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This enhancement adds three methods to `PassFailJFrame.Builder`:
>
> 1. **`splitUIRight`** to display test UI to the right of the instructions;
> 2. **`splitUIBottom`** to display test UI to the bottom of the instructions;
> 3. `splitUI`:
> This PR proposes to remove the use of `Unsafe` in the class
> `XEmbeddingContainer ` and replace it with the supported FFM API.
>
> I tried to make this PR as small as possible while opening up for migration
> of other classes later on (such as `XEmbedServer` which can be modified
> similarly
> This PR proposes to remove the use of `Unsafe` in the class
> `XEmbeddingContainer ` and replace it with the supported FFM API.
>
> I tried to make this PR as small as possible while opening up for migration
> of other classes later on (such as `XEmbedServer` which can be modified
> similarly
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:22:48 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This enhancement adds three methods to `PassFailJFrame.Builder`:
>
> 1. **`splitUIRight`** to display test UI to the right of the instructions;
> 2. **`splitUIBottom`** to display test UI to the bottom of the instructions;
> 3. `splitUI`:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:06:15 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> The `test/jdk/java/awt/print/PrinterJob/PrintLatinCJKTest.java` displays a
>> single *Print* button as its test UI. To simplify the UI, I used the new
>> `splitUI` method from #17845.
>>
>> In addition to it, I refactored the test:
>>
> The `test/jdk/java/awt/print/PrinterJob/PrintLatinCJKTest.java` displays a
> single *Print* button as its test UI. To simplify the UI, I used the new
> `splitUI` method from #17845.
>
> In addition to it, I refactored the test:
>
> - Extracted the rendered text into a constant to ensure the s
The `test/jdk/java/awt/print/PrinterJob/PrintLatinCJKTest.java` displays a
single *Print* button as its test UI. To simplify the UI, I used the new
`splitUI` method from #17845.
In addition to it, I refactored the test:
- Extracted the rendered text into a constant to ensure the same text is
p
This PR proposes to remove the use of `Unsafe` in the class
`XEmbeddingContainer ` and replace it with the supported FFM API.
I tried to make this PR as small as possible while opening up for migration of
other classes later on (such as `XEmbedServer` which can be modified similarly
under a sep
This enhancement adds three methods to `PassFailJFrame.Builder`:
1. **`splitUIRight`** to display test UI to the right of the instructions;
2. **`splitUIBottom`** to display test UI to the bottom of the instructions;
3. `splitUI`: a convenience method for a default split orientation, currently
de
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:50:15 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Existing regression test is failing because textfield height is not as per
>> test's expectation..Seems like the indic character being tried to render is
>> not being loaded (probably because of missing glyphs) leading to 0
>> pre
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:08:59 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> > For me, it fails on Windows because no suitable font is found;
>
> It is not because of fonts availability...It's because of the order of `pack
> `and `setVisible `being called which is causing some issue with
> `i18nFieldView `l
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 21:29:28 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> - new executor modes (buffer & volatile)
>> - support parallel rendering on several frames and / or screens
>> - added robot calibration + optionally use rounded duration to min frame
>> latency (120Hz)
>> - give more statistics in verbo
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:52:12 GMT, vtstydev wrote:
>> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,
>> PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows
>> platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
>
> vtstydev has
> Hi Reviewers,
>
> Updated manual printer test cases with 'PassFailJFrame', also removed unused
> variables. Added 'SkippedException' in case of printer missing or not
> configured.
>
> Please review and let me know your suggestions.
>
> Regards,
> Renjith
Renjith Kannath Pariyangad has upda
> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,
> PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows
> platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
vtstydev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:06:19 GMT, Renjith Kannath Pariyangad
wrote:
>> Hi Reviewers,
>>
>> Updated manual printer test cases with 'PassFailJFrame', also removed unused
>> variables. Added 'SkippedException' in case of printer missing or not
>> configured.
>>
>> Please review and let me know
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:35:13 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> For me, it fails on Windows because no suitable font is found;
It is not because of fonts availability...It's because of the order of `pack
`and `setVisible `being called which is causing some issue with `i18nFieldView
`layouting. If th
> Hi Reviewers,
>
> Updated manual printer test cases with 'PassFailJFrame', also removed unused
> variables. Added 'SkippedException' in case of printer missing or not
> configured.
>
> Please review and let me know your suggestions.
>
> Regards,
> Renjith
Renjith Kannath Pariyangad has upda
> Hi Reviewers,
>
> Updated manual printer test cases with 'PassFailJFrame', also removed unused
> variables. Added 'SkippedException' in case of printer missing or not
> configured.
>
> Please review and let me know your suggestions.
>
> Regards,
> Renjith
Renjith Kannath Pariyangad has upda
47 matches
Mail list logo
