On Oct 22, 6:45 pm, Chouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't dismiss clojure/zip to easily. The functions defined there
> largely defer to functions stored in metadata on the object. This
> means a new type of zip tree can be provided by anyone in any
> namespace, simply by returning an objec
On 23 Okt., 00:28, wwmorgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can get most of the functionality you're looking for with partial
Yes sure. The thing is that currying is nothing but syntactical sugar.
It's not the functionality I am missing, but it’s brevity which makes
sense in functional programmi
You can get most of the functionality you're looking for with partial
(map (partial * 3) (range 10)) => (0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27)
(map (partial apply max 0) (partition 3 1 (range -5 5))) => (0 0 0 0 1
2 3 4)
On Oct 22, 5:40 pm, André Thieme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22 Okt., 23:24, André
I was heading in the direction of generating javascript on the server for
page generation, so it makes some sense to keep using that technique for
communication as well. In this model the webclient is trusting the
javascript the server is generating, so I have to be diligent in my code
generation n
On 22 Okt., 23:24, André Thieme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This version of replace-placeholders still misses the numbered
> args %1, %2, .. as the reader would also steal those from me.
> In the end the #(..) macro would do it, instead of §.
So what I just did was extending it for this demostr
I would like to suggest to improve currying.
Right now Clojure already comes with a nice way to do something that
is
nearly as good as currying, but still not fully.
In a very functional programming style this makes sense to have good
currying support.
Here is my proposal for extending the #(...)
On Oct 22, 2008, at 8:22 AM, J. McConnell wrote:
>
>> Run tests with:
>>
>> (require 'clojure.contrib.test-clojure)
>
> I don't see clojure.contrib.test-clojure. Are you going to be
> committing that?
It's up now. Once your CA is in to Rich, I'll be happy to accept
patches to extend it
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Mark J P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Steps for running clojure as a .NET app and instantiating .NET types.
>
> - I converted the clojure.jar to clojure.dll: ikvmc -target:library c:
> \path\to\clojure.jar (this creates clojure.dll)
> - Convert mscorlib.dll to m
Hi Konrad,
On 22 Okt., 18:07, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But assume I wanto to provide two implementations for such an
> interface, in two separate namespaces. Can I then write client code
> that will work with either one? I would have to pass it the namespace
> as an argume
Forgot to include this step:
Add a reference to IKVM.OpenJDK.ClassLibrary.dll in the .NET Project
On Oct 22, 11:30 am, Mark J P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steps for running clojure as a .NET app and instantiating .NET types.
>
> - I converted the clojure.jar to clojure.dll: ikvmc -target:libr
Hi,
> But assume I wanto to provide two implementations for such an
> interface, in two separate namespaces.
Personally, I'd define multimethods as the “interface“, in a single
namespace, and implement them for any set of data structures that I
wanted to support.
At least, this is the CLOS way,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For interfaces with a single implementation, this sounds fine. And
> closure/zip is a fine example.
>
> But assume I wanto to provide two implementations for such an
> interface, in two separate namespaces. Can I th
hmmm, the .NET String thing isn't quite working for some reason.
Seems like it converts to the java string. I can work with
StringBuilder though:
(def sb (new cli.System.Text.StringBuilder))
(. sb (Append "asdf"))
On Oct 22, 11:30 am, Mark J P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steps for running clo
Hi Meikel,
thanks for your comments!
> Well on the one hand you can define interfaces "by documentation".
> Define the interface in the documentation and export the functions
> which do things as advertised from your namespace.
For interfaces with a single implementation, this sounds fine. And
Steps for running clojure as a .NET app and instantiating .NET types.
- I converted the clojure.jar to clojure.dll: ikvmc -target:library c:
\path\to\clojure.jar (this creates clojure.dll)
- Convert mscorlib.dll to mscorlib.jar: ikvmstub mscorlib.dll
- Create a .net c# console app, and add refer
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 22 October 2008 06:27, .Bill Smith wrote:
>> Would you have S-expressions going from the server back to the client
>> as well?
>
> If that client is a Web browser, then presumably it would require an
> S-
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 06:27, .Bill Smith wrote:
> Would you have S-expressions going from the server back to the client
> as well?
If that client is a Web browser, then presumably it would require an
S-Expression reader written in JavaScript to decode them.
That would be a nice thing to
Would you have S-expressions going from the server back to the client
as well?
Bill
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To u
Aarhus, Denmark
On 17 Okt., 11:27, "Rastislav Kassak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Clojurians,
>
> I think after 1st year of Clojure life it's good to check how far has
> Clojure spread all over the world.
>
> So wherever are you come from, be proud and say it.
>
> I'm from Slovakia. :)
>
>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Brett Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 22, 3:42 pm, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Oct 22, 1:30 pm, "Brett Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Brett Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I understand the lisp way is to use the reader plus macros to interpret the
> incoming data stream. This is hella cool in that it seriously cuts down on
> the amount of development work I have to do. The reader is already
> Run tests with:
>
>(require 'clojure.contrib.test-clojure)
I don't see clojure.contrib.test-clojure. Are you going to be committing that?
Thanks,
- J.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clo
Hello Stuart,
On 21 Okt., 16:37, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since there is now a movement afoot to write a comprehensive test
> suite, I want to re-post the spike I did earlier on ClojureCheck.
>
> It would be cool to use check-style tests for at least part of the
> Clojure
Rich,
Was this presentation recorded? Any chance you can upload the slides
and/or video for those of us that didn't participate in Lisp50.
Thanks
- Karl
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" grou
Hi Konrad,
On 22 Okt., 12:49, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, there is one point that is not clear to me: how does Clojure
> deal with data types in general, and abstract data types in
> particular? How would one implement a library for tree operations, a
> graph library
Milano, Italy
On Oct 17, 11:27 am, "Rastislav Kassak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Clojurians,
>
> I think after 1st year of Clojure life it's good to check how far has
> Clojure spread all over the world.
>
> So wherever are you come from, be proud and say it.
>
> I'm from Slovakia. :)
>
>
Wellington, New Zealand
"since 1989"
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
I second the thanks.
The Clojure presentation was perfectly timed. After a whole day of
talking about how Lisp was always about innovation. That Common Lisp
was never supposed to be an end---it was a practical compromise not a
technical ideal. That Lisp needs something new. Then you talked
ab
Hi everyone,
I recently discovered Clojure (largely by accident) and investigated
a bit by reading the on-line material and playing around with simple
expressions (I have used other Lisps in the past, but never
seriously). I am quite impressed with what I have seen - this looks
like the f
Hi everyone,
I recently discovered Clojure (largely by accident) and investigated a
bit by reading the on-line material and playing around with simple
expressions (I have used other Lisps in the past, but never
seriously). I am quite impressed with what I have seen - this looks
like the first Lis
Very positive about Clojure!
http://www.lispcast.com/drupal/node/77
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
I second the thanks.
The presentation was perfectly timed. The presentations that preceded
it built the perfect mood. The idea in the air was that Lisp was
about innovation and making programming easier. That Common Lisp was
never meant to be the end. That Lisp needs something new. And here
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Parth Malwankar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 22, 3:42 pm, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Oct 22, 1:30 pm, "Brett Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - Recently the #= reader macro was added. This makes the reader
> > do the e
On Oct 22, 3:42 pm, Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 1:30 pm, "Brett Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Recently the #= reader macro was added. This makes the reader
> do the evaluation before using the value. You may want to
> disable this. E.g.
>
> user=> #=(
On Oct 22, 1:30 pm, "Brett Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am thinking about a potential architecture for a webapp where in the
> server gets s expressions posted from an ajax web client.
>
> From a security standpoint, the s expressions are coming from an untrusted
> computer
I was honestly thinking of using S expressions purely as a replacement for
the current trend to use JSON for everything. JSON basically is S
expressions, except using hashmaps as the base type. The advantage being
that I get a parser and tree walker language for free.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:04
If your untrusted S-expressions are expected to be pure functions on
some input to some output, then you can use the existing java
sandboxing features[1] to execute/read/whatever them in threads that
are locked down tight. Then after sanitizing the output (which should
be raw data), and you're don
Hi all,
I am thinking about a potential architecture for a webapp where in the
server gets s expressions posted from an ajax web client.
>From a security standpoint, the s expressions are coming from an untrusted
computer, and thus are in need of careful vetting.
With my java dev hat on, i'd mov
38 matches
Mail list logo
