Hello All,
Is the fact that the output of (show java.math.BigInteger) and (show
bigint) differ is a bug or a feature? :)
All the best,
--
Miki
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post
On Apr 21, 12:18 pm, Daniel Jomphe danieljom...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Stadig wrote:
Others have commented on the whole groupId, artifactId, etc., etc. But in
terms of the parts of the version number, they are named
major.minor.incremental-qualifier as documented here:
Hi,
2009/4/22 Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com:
[...]
{:major 1, :minor 0, :incremental 0, :qualifier :rc1 :interim true}
[...]
Possible
values of :qualifier include :rc, :beta etc,
and :interim will be true for non-release builds.
I don't think :qualifier is used correctly here (at least
OOooops sorry, I mistook qualifier for classifier,
:qualifier seems totally appropriate here, sorry for the noise,
--
Laurent
2009/4/22 Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2009/4/22 Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com:
[...]
{:major 1, :minor 0, :incremental 0, :qualifier :rc1
On Apr 20, 10:42 pm, Andrew Wagner wagner.and...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be fun to have a team of clojure programmers work on the ICFP '09
contest. Has this been done previously? Anybody interested? I'm new to
clojure and to lisps in general, but have a pretty good grasp of functional
Daniel Jomphe wrote:
Rich Hickey wrote:
I don't mind the build producing clojure-1.0.0.jar etc, but it doesn't
now. The master build is Ant. Where is the best place to put the
version info so it can be leveraged by Ant, Maven and the clojure core
runtime in order to produce
On Apr 22, 2009, at 2:38 AM, miki wrote:
Is the fact that the output of (show java.math.BigInteger) and (show
bigint) differ is a bug or a feature? :)
java.math.BigInteger is a class.
bigint is a function.
Differing output from show is expected.
--Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:38 AM, miki miki.teb...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the fact that the output of (show java.math.BigInteger) and (show
bigint) differ is a bug or a feature? :)
Feature!
The symbol java.math.BigInteger refers to the BigInteger class, and
'show' shows that. The symbol bigint
Hello,
Is the fact that the output of (show java.math.BigInteger) and (show
bigint) differ is a bug or a feature? :)
java.math.BigInteger is a class.
bigint is a function.
Differing output from show is expected.
Ah, OK.
Thanks,
--
Miki
Let's say I have a sequence of integers:
(def a (3 9 1 5 102 -322 ...))
Is there a function for inserting an object—let's say :foo—after
elements that fulfill a certain predicate?
Furthermore, I mean inserting :foo after any block of elements that
fulfill it:
(mystery-function (partial 6)
Phil, that's useful advice about unpacking jar files to a project's
dependency directory versus dropping jar files in there. That would be
a good candidate for a FAQ regarding how to add dependent jars during
development without restarting your REPL. And it decreases questions
about the
2009/4/22 Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com:
[...]
{:major 1, :minor 0, :incremental 0, :qualifier :rc1 :interim true}
for interim versions and
{:major 1, :minor 0, :incremental 0}
for releases. :interim tracks the SNAPSHOT segment of the version
string.
[...]
I don't mind the build
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Hugh Winkler hwink...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:59 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Maps aren't ordered so this isn't a good idea anyway.
It's a good idea if you have a sorted map. My example should have used
sorted-map.
The
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:57 PM, samppi rbysam...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's say I have a sequence of integers:
(def a (3 9 1 5 102 -322 ...))
Is there a function for inserting an object—let's say :foo—after
elements that fulfill a certain predicate?
Furthermore, I mean inserting :foo after
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:01 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice post thanks for putting it together. My gut feeling is that the need
for information hiding is still overinflated, but... until someone builds a
200k LOC Clojure program who will know for sure?
Here's my shot at
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:57 PM, samppi rbysam...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's say I have a sequence of integers:
(def a (3 9 1 5 102 -322 ...))
Is there a function for inserting an object—let's say :foo—after
2009/4/22 Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:57 PM, samppi rbysam...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's say I have a sequence of integers:
(def a (3 9 1 5 102 -322 ...))
Is there a function for inserting an object—let's say :foo—after
elements that fulfill a certain
You're missing the clever hack ;) I'm hashing the private data structure and
associating it to the map. This is what is used in the equality test. You
can verify yourself that it works.
my-object ;; - {:private -1261861093}
my-other-object ;; - {:private -1261861093}
Make sense? A few quick tests
Hi,
Am 22.04.2009 um 16:57 schrieb samppi:
Let's say I have a sequence of integers:
(def a (3 9 1 5 102 -322 ...))
Is there a function for inserting an object—let's say :foo—after
elements that fulfill a certain predicate?
Furthermore, I mean inserting :foo after any block of elements that
Hi all.
I'm having problems with using swig-generated wrappers with Clojure.
I'm running ubuntu-8.04-i386, gcc-4.2.4, swig-1.3.33, openjdk-1.6.0,
latest clojure release.
I've cut down a minimal reproducible example.
The swig file:
---file:swig_test.i---
%module swig_test
%{
int
I couldn't find an equivalent to rm -rf in the JDK, so I wrote these
functions:
(defn delete-file
Delete file f. Raise an exception if it fails.
[f]
(or (.delete (file f))
(throw (java.io.IOException. (str Couldn't delete f)
(defn delete-file-recursively
Delete file f. If
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 22.04.2009 um 16:57 schrieb samppi:
Let's say I have a sequence of integers:
(def a (3 9 1 5 102 -322 ...))
Is there a function for inserting an object—let's say :foo—after
elements that fulfill a certain
I might be wrong,
but shouldn't you compile the .c file to .o with -fpic, and then
link with ld with -shared?
maybe just adding -fpic to:
gcc -fpic -shared ${JNI_CFLAGS} swig_test_wrap.c -o libswig_test.so
might do it.
On Apr 22, 6:41 am, Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo
antonio.fa...@gmail.com
Hi Micheal,
Am 22.04.2009 um 21:18 schrieb Michael Wood:
Your version gives the same answer as mine, but I believe what he
wants is something that skips over all the elements that pass the test
and only inserts one instance of o after them. That's why in his
example there is not a :foo after
On 22 Apr., 21:12, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
I couldn't find an equivalent to rm -rf in the JDK, so I wrote these
functions:
(defn delete-file
Delete file f. Raise an exception if it fails.
[f]
(or (.delete (file f))
(throw (java.io.IOException. (str Couldn't
Hi all!
(defn mystery-function [pred coll]
(lazy-seq
(when (seq coll)
(let [[run etc] (split-with pred coll)]
(if (seq run)
(concat run (cons :foo (mystery-function pred etc)))
(cons (first coll) (mystery-function pred (rest coll
Christophe
why is 'when' preferred ... so we know what the considerations are? Thanks
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:47 PM, André Thieme
splendidl...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 22 Apr., 21:12, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
I couldn't find an equivalent to rm -rf in the JDK, so I wrote these
i've noticed a pattern in explanations in clojure that interface and runtime
are related. Is that the point being made here? Make expensive things hard
or at least explicit?
Maybe instead of nth, since that causes controversy,
call it find-nth or something?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58
André Thieme splendidl...@googlemail.com writes:
This could really be helpful for some fixtures during unit testing.
That's exactly what I'm using it for. =) I think anyone else who has
tests that write files is going to need something like this too, which
is what made me think it'd be
I think this might come from Common Lisp (or Scheme, not sure).
In anycase CL also has unless which is exactly the opposite of
when - e.g. it would do the else part of if.
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/m_when_.htm
Basically some of the Common Lispers are saying that
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
Yeah, I had originally put this in the clojure.contrib.java-utils
namespace, which defines file. Not sure if that's the best place for it,
but I don't see anything else that would be a better fit.
This kind of
On Apr 22, 4:55 am, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be great if a Clojure team could have a go.
Rich
Interestingly, in the 11 year history of the ICFP contest, a Lisp
variant never won, not even a third prize (unless you consider Dylan a
Lisp), and not for lack of
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Wagner wagner.and...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be fun to have a team of clojure programmers work on the ICFP '09
contest. Has this been done previously? Anybody interested? I'm new to
clojure and to lisps in general, but have a pretty good grasp of
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Chouser chou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Wagner wagner.and...@gmail.com
wrote:
It would be fun to have a team of clojure programmers work on the ICFP '09
contest. Has this been done previously? Anybody interested? I'm new to
Try your hand at one of the older contests, like this one:
http://www.boundvariable.org/task.shtml
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi Chrisophe,
You are correct, the doall also solves the problem.
Based on that, I moved the doall out of matrixMultiply and into the
computeActualResponse function, so that the caller can decide whether
they want lazy evaluation for matrixMultiply or not:
(defn computeActualResponse
36 matches
Mail list logo
