On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:25 PM, JvJ wrote:
> This is not really a big deal, but I was wondering if there was a shorter
> alias for partial in the standard library. It seems like one of those
> things that should require a single-character operator.
Interesting, I am also interested in finding
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 2:36:21 PM UTC-7, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
>
> "Jim - FooBar();" writes:
>
> > Yes ok I do get that...but wouldn't you agree that is slightly easier
> > for plain Java than it is for clojure? Especially for someone that has
> > no idea how the clojure compiler works...fo
"Jim - FooBar();" writes:
> Yes ok I do get that...but wouldn't you agree that is slightly easier
> for plain Java than it is for clojure? Especially for someone that has
> no idea how the clojure compiler works...for example if you decompile
> a clojrue ns it just seems plain wrong!!!
>
> x = nu
Updated Brief Beginner's Guide to cover Leiningen 2.0.0-preview6 and OpenJDK 7:
http://www.unexpected-vortices.com/clojure/brief-beginners-guide/
---John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@go
Or perhaps something like this:
"Although it is possible to download Clojure directly here , for
a more complete package management system please see Leiningen."
But yes, I agree, we need a big fat notice that says "don't download
directly unless you know what you're doing".
Timothy
On Thu, Jun
Yes ok I do get that...but wouldn't you agree that is slightly easier
for plain Java than it is for clojure? Especially for someone that has
no idea how the clojure compiler works...for example if you decompile a
clojrue ns it just seems plain wrong!!!
x = null;
y= null;
//do something with x
Sure, but if the protocol hasn't changed, does a new type need to be
generated? Maybe this is too much to ask, but I would imagine that the
compiler could inspect the current protocol of the same name and compare it
with the newly evaluated one, and then only generate a new type when
necessary
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Vinzent wrote:
>> Actually, jsql looks very much like clojureql\korma.
>
> jsql has completely different goals to ClojureQL/Korma and is mostly a
> convenience for generating the sort of SQL that the update!
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:53:41 PM UTC+1, David Nolen wrote:
>
>
> Looking forward to an Overtone API over WebAudio (
> http://chromium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/samples/audio/index.html) :)
>
> David
>
This has been discussed briefly, but it would be a serious undertaking to
develop something
something like %() becomes possible with reader literals in clojure 1.4
Not sure if it is a good idea though also, top level literals are
reserved
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jay Fields wrote:
I'd actually like to see %(...) become (partial ...), as I think
> people associate % with
Hi,
It appears to me that, at the top of http://clojure.org/downloads , it
should say,
"Though, for typical use, install
[Leiningen](http://leiningen.org/index.html) and have it take care of
getting Clojure for you."
Would it be possible to change this? I've sent in my CA, but don't
know if Rich
"jim.foobar" writes:
> If we aot compile a namespace in clojure will it be harder to
> decompile than the Java equivalent? Recently, the concept of securing
> code came up where I work and was asked what Clojure does for
> that...Now, from what I've noticed libraries tend to be shipped with
> re
Is there a central repository for graph/complex network algorithms?
Specifically I'm interested in algorithms intended for larger graphs like
centrality measures, clustering coefficients, etc...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Vinzent wrote:
> Actually, jsql looks very much like clojureql\korma.
jsql has completely different goals to ClojureQL/Korma and is mostly a
convenience for generating the sort of SQL that the update!, insert!
and delete! methods need under the hood (c.j.jdbc has
Hey guys I was just wondering
If we aot compile a namespace in clojure will it be harder to decompile
than the Java equivalent? Recently, the concept of securing code came up
where I work and was asked what Clojure does for that...Now, from what
I've noticed libraries tend to be shipped w
I created a guide from my recent experience with Clojure + Leiningen2 +
Emacs (on Linux and Mac OSX) that hopefully makes it very easy for
developers to get a productive environment.
http://clojure.jr0cket.co.uk/perfect-environment
I would be willing to contribute any or all of this if its useful
Colin,
I love Clojure language and have done small personal projects. Actually, I
like all types of functional languages, had a lot of experience on xquery
and related technologies, schema and lisp.
May I learn what you are doing?
Erol Akarsu
On Monday, June 18, 2012 9:27:53 AM UTC-4, Colin St
On 21/06/12 03:58, John Gabriele wrote:
Sometimes you need to spend time with an editor + repl to see the
value in something more sophisticated.
Also, I suppose sometimes you end up sticking with the editor + repl
anyway.:)
exactlypersonally I'm sticking to editor + embedded repl until
li
Actually, jsql looks very much like clojureql\korma. Honetly, I wish see
better support for clojureql rather than new similar DSLs coming up.
четверг, 21 июня 2012 г., 11:36:24 UTC+6 пользователь Sean Corfield написал:
>
> Just two changes in this release:
>
> * as-str now treats a.b as two iden
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Rogier Peters
> wrote:
>> With all the higher-order functions in the new reducers, I was
>> wondering if it is possible to print a generated function, like using
>> (source f).
>
> You need serializable-fn
20 matches
Mail list logo
