We added this as part of our standard
logging, not only when exceptions
are raised. It does help a lot in prod...
Luc P.
On Dec 27, 2013, at 11:33 PM, guns wrote:
On Fri 27 Dec 2013 at 11:23:22PM -0500, Lee Spector wrote:
On Dec 27, 2013, at 11:18 PM, guns wrote:
(defmacro
I'm sure I'm missing something very simple here, but I'm damned if I can see it.
I'm trying to use the Java Rome RSS/Atom utility library from Clojure. The Rome
Fetcher library defines a FeedEvent class, which among other things defines a
number of static final string members:
The test clauses of case expressions are not evaluated, so that case is
trying to match the symbol 'FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED, not
the value of FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED.
Paul Butcher writes:
I'm sure I'm missing something very simple here, but I'm damned if I can see
it.
Will do. Once the migration is steady (that is, we have a 1.2 and 1.5
environment running concurrently), I'll write a post about the experience
and how we will eventually decommission the 1.2 environment.
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 1:48:22 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24,
:pre and :post http://blog.fogus.me/2009/12/21/clojures-pre-and-post/ are
great tools, but must be used at the very top of your function. You can
also use assert http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/assert,
at any location in your function. I've also had success with Prismatic's
Schema
On 30 Dec 2013, at 13:57, Nicola Mometto brobro...@gmail.com wrote:
The test clauses of case expressions are not evaluated, so that case is
trying to match the symbol 'FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED, not
the value of FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED.
Ah - I was aware of the
Thanks, Alex.
I agree that migrating these tiny 1.2 applications would be wasted effort
as the majority won't change and will become obsolete soon anyway.The ones
which will remain relevant will be easy to identify and may be worth
migrating.
Regarding testing, no, I have no confidence in
Optimus https://github.com/magnars/optimus is a Ring middleware for
frontend performance optimization.
In order to do its optimization, it needs to rest on a first-class asset
concept in the Ring stack. So the most basic operation of Optimus is
serving assets from a list, with this minimal
Oh, if you checked out Optimus when I first announced it, here are some
improvements since then:
- Split strategies and optimizations so they can vary independently.
- Add support for :base-path on assets for CDNs.
- Add exporting of assets to disk. Also for CDNs.
- Move Angular.JS
clj-refactor.el https://github.com/magnars/clj-refactor.el provides a set
of simple refactorings for Clojure in Emacs. It doesn't tackle the hard
problems, like cross-namespace renaming. Instead it gives you a little
quality of life while we're waiting.
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 1:30 PM, larry google groups
lawrencecloj...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for that. But the app has no problem reading the schema.edn file when
I start the app with:
java -jar admin-1-standalone.jar
So why would it have trouble reading the file when I'm in the repl?
Can
To do it with case, you'd need to wrap case in a macro that expanded to
`(case ~thingy ~(eval case1) ...) or something along those lines, with the
evals snapping lookups like FetcherEvent/EVENT_TYPE_FEED_POLLED to the
associated constants. This will have the effect of classloading the class
with
Clojure contrib wrapper for JDBC.
This release contains minor bug fixes compared to 0.3.0, with the main
focus being an overhaul of docstrings etc to improve the auto-gen'd
documentation:
http://clojure.github.io/java.jdbc/
The community documentation on clojure-doc has also had a major
Just found a showstopping bug in 0.3.1 - 0.3.2 will be along shortly.
TIL: protocols need implementations for both Object _and_ nil to work
properly in the real world... :(
Sean
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Clojure contrib wrapper for JDBC.
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 10:11:47 PM UTC+1, tbc++ wrote:
Not mentioned in Cedric's post are two other important things:
Protocols can be extended to existing types. For example:
(defprotocol IType
(type-as-string [x]))
(extend-protocol IType
String
(type-as-string [x] string)
The tests have been updated to included nil cases now so I shouldn't
make the same mistake again.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Just found a showstopping bug in 0.3.1 - 0.3.2 will be along shortly.
TIL: protocols need implementations for both
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli kiuhn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 10:11:47 PM UTC+1, tbc++ wrote:
Not mentioned in Cedric's post are two other important things:
Protocols can be extended to existing types. For example:
(defprotocol IType
Hi Magnar,
I've been using this library for maybe a month. The refactorings I use by
far the most are renaming files, and threading/unthreading. Thanks for your
work on this.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Magnar Sveen magn...@gmail.com wrote:
clj-refactor.el
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 11:30:16 PM UTC+1, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Timothy Baldridge
tbald...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Not mentioned in Cedric's post are two other important things:
Protocols can be extended to existing types.
These are important
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli kiuhn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 11:30:16 PM UTC+1, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Timothy Baldridge tbald...@gmail.comwrote:
Not mentioned in Cedric's post are two other important things:
On Monday, December 30, 2013 6:27:05 PM UTC+1, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli
kiuh...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 10:11:47 PM UTC+1, tbc++ wrote:
Not mentioned in Cedric's post are two other important things:
C# extension methods are not polymorphic either. For example, casting a
object to a parent type will cause a different extension method to be run.
This is not the case in normal polymorphism, or for protocols (Clojure is a
dynamic language, so casting doesn't exist anyways).
You're right, you can
On Monday, December 30, 2013 6:31:52 PM UTC+1, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli
kiuh...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 11:30:16 PM UTC+1, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Timothy Baldridge
If the Expression Problem consists in extending classes then non-OOP
languages must be excluded because they don't have classes.
No offense intended, but that is an incredibly wrong statement. Let's look
up the official definition of the expression problem (via wikipedia): The
goal is to define
Ok, so if we take that definition of classes and methods, then what I'm
saying is that the expression problem can be solved much easier via single
dispatch polymorphic functions, and datatypes. At that point it's just a
question of where the vtable is stored. In C++ it's in the object, in
Clojure,
On Monday, December 30, 2013 6:46:13 PM UTC+1, tbc++ wrote:
And what Cedric says is correct, encapsulation is rarely a good thing, and
inheritance is overrated.
That's your opinion, not a fact.
By saying that something is overrated you're just admitting that many
people don't agree with
There's been a trend against overuse of inheritance, first with java
removing multiple-inheritance and the various private/protected nuanced
inheritances, then generally accepted advice like 'prefer composition over
inheritance'. Some people were still feeling the pain, and some of those
are now
Clojure contrib wrapper for JDBC.
This release contains minor bug fixes compared to 0.3.0, with the main
focus being an overhaul of docstrings etc to improve the auto-gen'd
documentation:
http://clojure.github.io/java.jdbc/
The community documentation on clojure-doc has also had a major
ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source code.
README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
New release version: 0.0-2134
Leiningen dependency information:
[org.clojure/clojurescript 0.0-2134]
Enhancements:
* Add ICloneable protocol, persistent
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli kiuhn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, December 30, 2013 6:27:05 PM UTC+1, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli
kiuh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 10:11:47 PM UTC+1, tbc++
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli kiuhn...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, December 30, 2013 6:31:52 PM UTC+1, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli
kiuh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, December 29, 2013 11:30:16 PM UTC+1, Cedric
Hello. I'll be ready to give away 100 $ to help you build this project.
leontalbot a gmail com.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
Thanks for the offer Leon. :)
Currently I'm busy with a lot of other stuff so I can't dedicate time to
this but if I ever come back to this I'll contact you. :)
On Monday, December 30, 2013 3:27:27 PM UTC-6, Leon Talbot wrote:
Hello. I'll be ready to give away 100 $ to help you build this
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli
A class must support encapsulation, inheritance and polymorphism. If it
doesn't, then it isn't a class. The same way, a method is a function that
belongs to a
ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source code.
README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
New release version: 0.0-2138
Leiningen dependency information:
[org.clojure/clojurescript 0.0-2138]
Enhancements:
* Implement specify, instance level
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:12:12 AM UTC-8, David Nolen wrote:
Enjoy, http://swannodette.github.io/2013/12/17/the-future-of-javascript-mvcs/
David
I've been playing around with some basics. I'm still a relative n00b when it
comes to functional programming, and I've never looked at
From a React dev:
https://www.khanacademy.org/preview/content/items/xfa03b103
https://github.com/Khan/perseus/blob/master/src/widgets/orderer.jsx#L6-L439
I'm sure this can be adapted for Om. I may write up a simpler Om example in
the future.
David
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:43 AM, David
37 matches
Mail list logo
