Re: [ANN] huffman-keybindings 0.0.1

Hi Edouard, This library is indeed interesting. However one comment (without wanting to derail the conversation from the library itself) - the use of AGPL is likely problematic since Clojure and the majority of the libraries available for it use the EPL. See here

Re: [ANN] huffman-keybindings 0.0.1

Hi Edouard This is very cool, thanks for sharing! On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:11 AM Edouard KLEIN wrote: > huffman-keybindings is a small library to balance a 26-ary huffman tree, > typically to associate shorter keybindings to the most often used UI > components. > > The

Re: Sayid Pro - Transparency for Clojure Production Environments (kickstarter)

I was surprised by some of the results too. One thing to consider though: if you added up all the editors (emacs, cursive, vim, atom), I think it exceeded the votes for a web UI, but web is the common denominator. On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 1:30:00 PM UTC-4, adrian...@mail.yu.edu wrote: > >

Re: Sayid Pro - Transparency for Clojure Production Environments (kickstarter)

Thanks for the clarifications and answers! Interested to see what Emacs integration looks like. I'm surprised most developers want web interfaces for this stuff but can't argue with the data if it means more licenses sold for you. On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 1:10:37 PM UTC-4, Bill Piel wrote: >

Re: Sayid Pro - Transparency for Clojure Production Environments (kickstarter)

Thanks for the questions and feedback, Adrian. > Why is the Pro version acceptable for production use and the free version is not? I thought I addressed that well in the video, but maybe not. And I didn't do much to address that in the text. The answer is that sayid stores all the data that

Re: Sayid Pro - Transparency for Clojure Production Environments (kickstarter)

Why is the Pro version acceptable for production use and the free version is not? Is it just the UI/UX improvements? I looked for this in the Kickstarter since I assumed this would be a major selling point, but could not find the answer. Apologies if I missed something. I guess I also have

Re: Clojure.spec: need function equivalents of library macros?

Oops, some corrections to my original post. On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 11:38:34 AM UTC-4, Dave Tenny wrote: > > Let's say I have a namespace that provides access to the database, > say our table has these fields (as clojure specs) > > (s/def ::job-id nat-int?) ; 1 2 3 ... > (s/def ::job-name

Clojure.spec: need function equivalents of library macros?

Let's say I have a namespace that provides access to the database, say our table has these fields (as clojure specs) (s/def ::job-id nat-int?) ; 1 2 3 ... (s/def ::job-name string?) ; frobozz-executor (s/def ::job-status keyword?) ; :queued, :in-progress, :completed And that I have the

[ANN] huffman-keybindings 0.0.1

huffman-keybindings is a small library to balance a 26-ary huffman tree, typically to associate shorter keybindings to the most often used UI components. The code is here https://github.com/edouardklein/huffman-keybindings/ This is my first time disclosing clojure code. Any comments or

Sayid Pro - Transparency for Clojure Production Environments (kickstarter)

Today I launched a kickstarter for Sayid Pro. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1269641244/sayid-pro-transparency-for-clojure-production-envi Maybe you've heard of Sayid, a clojure debugger and profiler, that I wrote and then presented at Conj 2016. After my talk, a lot of people asked me if