> This is the excuse continually trotted out by people too lazy to
> comment, or who think themselves superior to merely mortal programmers
> who have to work in teams and actually communicate with people.
> Redundancy in communication is almost never redundant; think of it as
> a checksum.
Hey Mark,
In addition to Meikel's explanation above, have a look at this
message
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/17ada41fcb5ef667
from the overall thread
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/ff80d120c996ba1a/9bfbfe1b08246035#
This was the post that finally made
> Anyone have any ideas? I'm pretty confused as to what might be going
> on. Some sort of deadlock in the thread pool that isn't allowing the
> AWT event thread any cycles? I'm looking at the thread pool in JSwat
> and I see a lot of Swank threads, but I can't tell exactly what's
> going on.
I li
>
> Fixed - thanks for the report.
>
ahh since you're here and responding, there is a reference to
'boot.clj' at http://clojure.org/getting_started which is no longer
valid.. this page also points to sourceforge ...
any plans for a bug/typo tracking system so we don't fill up the group
with to
> Suggestions for entries welcome here.
>
> Rich
How about:
What language constructs/objects may be found in the function position
of an expression?
Ii like the fact that sets, maps and vectors are all 'functions of
their keys', and that keywords and symbols are functions of maps.
((([ + - ap
>
> I know don't feel comfortable with the notion of lib. I currently
> assume that it is more or less similar to a namespace : it looks like
> a namespace, it tastes like a namespace, but still does seem to be not
> considered a namespace.
>
I understand your pain. I am right now going through
> If I'm wrong, could you please help me understand, maybe by giving me
> a URL I may have missed ?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Laurent PETIT
yes it is out of date... check the post 5 posts down:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/4a4c2e3e7aab5325#
--~--~-~--~~--
> In general, clojure-contrib is a good place to look to find examples
> of properly laid-out libs, as well as generally idiomatic Clojure
> code.
>
> --Chouser
Yeah, just recently I've taken to scanning the code in 'webjure' and
'swank' to see how things are done, rather than relying on the APIs
> How did you know that it delegates to 'get'?
sorry, I rushed that part.
the keyword and symbol are instances of clojure.lang.Keyword and
clojure.lang.Symbol
which are _java_ classes found in Keyword.java and Symbol.java (I
found these in the src/jvm directory)
These are what the invoke( ) m
> Looks like an if then else version of the map lookup??
> ie: (if (%1 %2) (%1 %2) %3)
> Is this a special feature of maps in general, such that you can look
> up a key but return something else if it doesn't exist?
> I hadn't come across it yet, but it sounds useful :)
This is exactly right (I j
I've been trying to get 'ns' right. The doc for 'require' tells me
the following about library loading:
"The root resource path
is derived from the root directory path by repeating its last
component
and appending '.clj'. For example, the lib 'x.y.z has root directory
/x/y/z; root resource
> I've been reading the latest chapter from Stuart's book, Chapter 7:
> Macros, and he makes this statement:
>
> "Clojure has no special syntax for code. Code is simply Clojure data.
> This is true for normal functions, but also for special forms and
> macros. Consider a language with syntax, su
> > user> (path-rebind nested-structure [:nested1 :nested2 :final-data]
> > "new data")
> > {:nested1 {:nested2 {:final-data "new data", :level 2}, :level
> > 1}, :level 0}
>
> Congratulations, you've implemented 'assoc-in' :-)
>
> user=> (assoc-in nested-structure [:nested1 :nested2 :final-data]
> > One thing I immediately ran up against were certain situations where
> > I have a map and want to "modify" a value several levels deep into
> > the hierarchy. Imagine the following structure:
>
> > (def nested-structure { :level 0,
> > :nested1 { :level 1,
> >
Hi all,
I am relatively new to clojure. I am trying to port some toy code I
wrote for common lisp a few years ago (a boggle-like game which needs
a dictionary prefix trie to trim possible word matches).
My old code was fairly imperative in nature when creating the
dictionary trie, and so now I a
ahhh... to answer my own question (and if I had looked at the code
and the API a bit closer),
it turns out that "recur" can only be used in tail-position... and
your code (as a tree-recursor) would
not benefit from this.
On Dec 4, 5:39 pm, Daniel Eklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
oops...
I am just learning the language right now and just quickly looked
at what you did...
Would the use of "recur" instead of self-calls potentially help
consuming stack space?
http://clojure.org/special_forms#toc10
On Dec 4, 5:37 pm, Daniel Eklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I
On Dec 4, 2:55 pm, PeterB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded clojure_20080916.zip and had a go with a simple tree
> benchmark (cut-down version of the one in the computer language
> shootout http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/).
>
> The Java version is pretty simple and runs in a
beautiful !
thanks... i was just looking for something like this
On Nov 21, 3:17 am, Mark McGranaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created some experimental HTML docs for Clojure. You can see them
> on S3:http://clj-doc.s3.amazonaws.com/tmp/doc-1116/index.html
>
> Or, just for kicks, on Ama
19 matches
Mail list logo
