Clojure (use 'clojure.data)
nil
Clojure (doc diff)
-
clojure.data/diff
([a b])
Recursively compares a and b, returning a tuple of
[things-only-in-a things-only-in-b things-in-both].
Comparison rules:
* For equal a and b, return [nil nil a].
* Maps are subdiffed where keys
Have seen this as well. For efficiency sake 1.3.0 requires :dynamic
meta for convention based ear-muffed vars (intended for rebinding).
The warning actually is quite descriptive if you think about it.
See more in-depth discussion at
Came across the following in one of the clojure libs (congomongo to be
exact)
https://github.com/aboekhoff/congomongo/blob/master/src/somnium/congomongo.clj:464
(defn command
Executes a database command.
{:arglists '([cmd {:options nil :from :clojure :to :clojure}])}
[cmd {:keys [options
Do we have this jar in clojars? Searched for it under math but could
not find it.
Found version 0.0.2 in mvnrepository.com but it is not the the version
0.0.3-SNAPSHOT mentioned in
https://github.com/clojure/math.combinatorics/blob/master/pom.xml
--
You received this message because you are
Do we have this jar in clojars? Searched for it under math but could
not find it.
Found version 0.0.2 in mvnrepository.com but it is not the the version
0.0.3-SNAPSHOT mentioned in
https://github.com/clojure/math.combinatorics/blob/master/pom.xml
--
You received this message because you are
Thanks, Alan. It is more general solution which also works for keys
that are not keywords
user= (map {a 1 b 2 c 3} [ a b])
(1 2)
On Dec 1, 5:02 pm, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
I usually use juxt, but a more correct/robust solution is to use map,
with the lookup-map as the function:
You can add jar to a classpath at runtime via the hack below.
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/95ea6e918c430e/69c0d195defeeed3?lnk=gstq=classpath#69c0d195defeeed3
HTH
On Dec 7, 10:26 am, Pierre-Yves Ritschard p...@spootnik.org wrote:
Hi,
I have a use case where a
Is there something build in for getting multiple vals out of the map?
{:keys [...]} woks in destructuring forms. It is quite easy to build
something with filter and map but I suspect these is a common problem
somebody solved already.
Desired
(get-vals [:a :b] {:a 1 :b 2 :c 3})
(1 2)
--
You
Thanks, works in my case.
On Dec 1, 3:26 pm, Ulises ulises.cerv...@gmail.com wrote:
How about using juxt:
sandbox ((juxt :foo :bar) {:foo 1 :bar 2 :baz 0})
[1 2]
sandbox
This only works, however, if you use keywords for keys (as they are
functions themselves).
U
--
You received this
Gary,
You are probably removing try/catch as well. ClassNonFoundException is
expected and silenced with catch.
(defn cl-factory
Returns a Commons Logging-based implementation of the
LoggerFactory
protocol, or
nil if not available.
[]
(try
(Class/forName foo.bar)
; eval removed
Andy,
You can also look into using futures (pmap uses future).
In section 11.6.1 of Joy of Clojure there is a recipe how to
dispatch multiple RPC calls in parallel using as-futures macro.
Obviously, this depends on what you want to do with results of your
REST calls.
On Nov 22, 11:16 am, AndyK
Gary,
You were right with your initial reply. Sorry I did not get it. Thanks
for your help in understanding this.
On Nov 22, 1:58 pm, Gary Trakhman gary.trakh...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I think this line doesn't actually do anything: (Class/forName
foo.bar)
It will effectively just ask the
this:
(binding [*logger-factory* (log-impl/log4j-factory)]
(do-stuff-with-the-logger-factory-rebound))
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:17 PM, vitalyper vitaly...@yahoo.com wrote:
clojure.tools.logging defines *logger-factory* and initializes it with
first logger implementation on the class path
Came across this code in clojure.tools.logging
(defn cl-factory
Returns a Commons Logging-based implementation of the LoggerFactory
protocol, or
nil if not available.
[]
(try
(Class/forName org.apache.commons.logging.Log)
(eval
`(do
(extend
I don't think you are right - it does compiles without it.
After more thinking my guess is that eval is used to combine extend
and reify in the same function. Let's see if somebody else could shed
a light on this.
On Nov 18, 12:45 pm, Gary Trakhman gary.trakh...@gmail.com wrote:
My speculation
clojure.tools.logging defines *logger-factory* and initializes it with
first logger implementation on the class path
(def ^{:doc
An instance satisfying the impl/LoggerFactory protocol. Used
internally to
obtain an impl/Logger. Defaults to the value returned from impl/
find-factory.
16 matches
Mail list logo