That's really is a cool idea of feature.
I intend to add such a feature as well in ccw, will certainly be a very
useful command in the default mode !
(and also in the REPL ? hmmm )
2010/9/30 blais bl...@furius.ca
It's too small to be an Emacs package, but I've forked it into its own
file
It's too small to be an Emacs package, but I've forked it into its own
file and a few improvements have been made to it.
Here:
http://furius.ca/pubcode/pub/conf/common/elisp/blais/close-matching.el
( It is linked from this page: http://furius.ca/pubcode/ )
On Sep 28, 6:03 pm, .Bill Smith
Hi,
blais is not talking 'bout openings, but closings.
When you have this (the pipe symbol for the cursor position) :
(def | foo [bar baz] (hello ) )
If you type
)
You will have with paredit the cursor which jumps after the last closing
paren, instead of just inserting this damn closing
2010/9/27 Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org
Hi,
did you already try out paredit [1]? That mode is absolutely fabulous
for programming any lisp and provides much more than just closing
parens.
My bet is that it's exactly paredit's behavior the OP is complaining about.
We had the same
The message below pretty much sums it up.
My original problem with paredit and such is that it creates
modality,
that is, the behaviour of insertion depends on the context.
This variable behaviour, this modality problem is what Jef Raskin
talks about in
The Humane Interface (a truly enlightening
On Sep 26, 2010, at 6:51 PM, blais wrote:
Writing Clojure code tends to require a larger mix of (),
[] and {} characters than other LISPs I use. This
sometimes makes it a bit tiring to write those balanced
expressions.
For outer expressions I tend to use the verbose forms (hash-map ...) and
Hi,
Am 28.09.2010 um 19:07 schrieb Michael Gardner:
Does anybody know of an equivalent for Vim?
Not yet, but it is on the radar for VC now. :)
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Blais,
Thank you for contributing the emacs code. I have been looking for
the same thing, for the reasons you and Laurent PETIT described.
Bill Smith
Austin, Texas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi,
Writing Clojure code tends to require a larger mix of (),
[] and {} characters than other LISPs I use. This
sometimes makes it a bit tiring to write those balanced
expressions.
Writing balanced expressions has been addressed in editors
mainly by providing the automated insertion of matching
I'm curious what you don't like about the automatic insertion scheme
that you talked about. I'm using Parenedit with emacs and I'm quite
happy with it. I think the scheme is quite simple... whenever you type
'(', it inserts ')'. Similarly with '[' and '{'.
-Patrick
On Sep 26, 7:51 pm, blais
Hi,
did you already try out paredit [1]? That mode is absolutely fabulous
for programming any lisp and provides much more than just closing
parens.
Give it a shot!
Bye,
Tassilo
Footnotes:
[1] http://mumble.net/~campbell/emacs/paredit.el
--
You received this message because you are
Thank you blais --- I also have troubles with paredit and this
function will really help me out.
keep up the good work,
--Robert McIntyre
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi,
did you already try out paredit [1]? That mode is absolutely fabulous
12 matches
Mail list logo
