If only there were C/C-- port of clojure which will keep all of
clojure ideas and instead of java use '.' for easy access to C/C++
libraries/functions. And it should also be able to compile to native
code and create native executables.
Just dreaming...
On 18 феб, 04:54, dmiller
When the rough edges are filed off, it should distributable as a set
of DLLs (and a console EXE) like any other .NET application. It
should be able to follow the DLR to Mono.
On Feb 18, 3:23 am, Johan Berntsson johan.may...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 9:17 am, dmiller dmiller2...@gmail.com
On 18 феб, 15:13, dmiller dmiller2...@gmail.com wrote:
When the rough edges are filed off, it should distributable as a set
of DLLs (and a console EXE) like any other .NET application. It
should be able to follow the DLR to Mono.
You mean DLR can create executables that don't need .NET
like any other .NET application means needs the .NET runtime., but
does not need Visual Studio or inserting Tab A into Slot B to get it
all to work.
On Feb 18, 11:51 am, Marko Kocić marko.ko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 феб, 15:13, dmiller dmiller2...@gmail.com wrote:
When the rough edges are
I can see a minor problem with ClojureCLR, that is, j in clojure stands
for JVM, right? So it's a bit messy.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
Clonure (n for dot *n*et), as in : Clonure, a dot net clone of Clojure
(ok, sorry ;-)
2009/2/17 Lucio Fulci luciofulc...@gmail.com
I can see a minor problem with ClojureCLR, that is, j in clojure stands
for JVM, right? So it's a bit messy.
Haha. I just noticed my typo in the previous post. Disregard that. :|
On Feb 17, 3:22 am, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Clonure (n for dot *n*et), as in : Clonure, a dot net clone of Clojure
(ok, sorry ;-)
2009/2/17 Lucio Fulci luciofulc...@gmail.com
I can see a minor
Fantastic news, David. This should help the spread of Clojure.
Although I like Bonjure as a name, and even though two syllable
names are generally considered best by marketers, I think ClojureCLR
is best for branding purposes. It helps spread the Clojure meme and it
linguistically supports the
I've been working on Xronos which is also a c# version of clojure (I
need to be careful to not use the work port, since it doesn't share
any code with clojure). It compiles to the DLR as well. It is located
here:
http://www.bitbucket.org/stefanrusek/xronos/wiki/Home
One big difference is that
I'm up for suggestions on the name. The obvious ones:
- Clojure.net
- ClojureCLR
- IronClojure (paralleling IronPython/IronRuby, unless MS has Iron
trademarked.)
- CLjR (too cute)
Perhaps Rich will have a preference. He'll have to live with it
longer than anyone and has
On Feb 17, 9:03 am, Craig Andera craig.and...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm up for suggestions on the name. The obvious ones:
- Clojure.net
- ClojureCLR
- IronClojure (paralleling IronPython/IronRuby, unless MS has Iron
trademarked.)
- CLjR (too cute)
Perhaps Rich will have a
So, as a long-time .NET guy, IronClojure seems like the best name, in
terms of making it obvious what it does: it's like IronRuby/Python,
but it's Clojure. Failing that, it seems like NClojure fits the
pattern of other JVM-ported efforts. I realize that there's already an
Enclojure.
As far as I understood, the rules are that it should be derived from Clojure
and sports either an N or a CLR. So I suggest Conjure
It looks like clojure, sounds pleasing, and sounds lispish (conj). And Lisp
to me sounds like magic (in the Arthur C. Clarke meaning that it is a
technology
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Craig Andera craig.and...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm up for suggestions on the name. The obvious ones:
- Clojure.net
- ClojureCLR
- IronClojure (paralleling IronPython/IronRuby, unless MS has Iron
trademarked.)
- CLjR (too cute)
Perhaps Rich will have a
My thanks to Rich for the suggestion to go public and for agreeing to
include this as part of the Clojure community.
Thanks to all for the encouragement.
-- David
On Feb 17, 2:55 pm, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
The whole point of including David's work in contrib is to give
[I thought I'd slip this in while Rich has everyone distracted lazy
sequences.]
What do you do when you love Lisp, are intrigued by Clojure, but have
absolutely no projects at hand to test it out? Oh, and you have an
interest in how dynamic languages are being implemented in modern
virtual
Awesome!
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:43 PM, dmiller dmiller2...@gmail.com wrote:
[I thought I'd slip this in while Rich has everyone distracted lazy
sequences.]
What do you do when you love Lisp, are intrigued by Clojure, but have
absolutely no projects at hand to test it out? Oh, and you
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:43 PM, dmiller dmiller2...@gmail.com wrote:
The code will go up on clojure-contrib ASAP. I need input from the
clojure-contrib project members on how they operate, where they want
to put it, etc.
I don't know if you've looked at ClojureScript at all, but it's a
On Feb 16, 5:33 pm, Chouser chou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:43 PM, dmiller dmiller2...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if you've looked at ClojureScript at all, but it's a
similar if noticeably less ambitious project to compile Clojure code to
JavaScript. It's in
On Feb 16, 2009, at 7:17 PM, dmiller wrote:
On Feb 16, 5:33 pm, Chouser chou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:43 PM, dmiller dmiller2...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't know if you've looked at ClojureScript at all, but it's a
similar if noticeably less ambitious project to
Anything buy IronClojure.
On Feb 16, 7:30 pm, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2009, at 7:17 PM, dmiller wrote:
On Feb 16, 5:33 pm, Chouser chou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:43 PM, dmiller dmiller2...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't know if you've
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Rayne disciplera...@gmail.com wrote:
Anything buy IronClojure.
There's already an IronLisp anyway:
http://www.codeplex.com/IronLisp
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
David,
You have a great idea here with porting clojure to the CLR. The .NET
shops are just a popular as Java shops, and something like this could
go a long way to improving software written by a lot of people. Your
initiative and hard work are to be commended.
How do you plan on solving the
ClojureCLR it shall be.
--dm
On Feb 16, 7:30 pm, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer ClojureCLR.
Rich
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send
24 matches
Mail list logo
