I am not sure pulling out whole of clojure is a good idea. Just
pulling out trunk should suffice. If and when the tags and branches
gets populated, this svn checkout will pull all of them.
-- KD
Dakshinamurthy Karra
(blog: http://blog.marathontesting.com)
(daily dose: http://twitter.com/marathon
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Mark Volkmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you're going to frequently get the latest from SVN, I suggest using
> a script like the following. It assumes you are in a directory that
> contains the subdirectories "clojure" and "clojure-contrib" that were
> initi
If you're going to frequently get the latest from SVN, I suggest using
a script like the following. It assumes you are in a directory that
contains the subdirectories "clojure" and "clojure-contrib" that were
initially created by doing svn checkouts. This is for UNIX, Linux or
Mac. You should be a
One thing I'll mention is that most of the libraries and user code is
going to be written with post-AOT changes in mind. Contrib is
currently maintaining copies of the files in the old locations, but I
doubt support for pre-AOT will continue much past the next release
once everyone has switched.
Hi,
Am 30.11.2008 um 04:47 schrieb Kyle Schaffrick:
Regarding Chimp, maybe you can try Gorilla:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/c8b7bc3106c39791
I haven't used it personally yet.
My mistake, I actually did mean Gorilla and not Chimp.
Please note, that Gorilla is
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:05:23 -0800 (PST)
Parth Malwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Regarding Chimp, maybe you can try Gorilla:
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/c8b7bc3106c39791
> I haven't used it personally yet.
>
My mistake, I actually did mean Gorilla and no
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Kyle Schaffrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm running the latest packaged release, and I'd like to start writing
> some more serious "spikes" in Clojure, but I'm starting to get the
> impression that I should be using the SVN version instead to get the
> lates
Kyle Schaffrick wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been playing with Clojure for a few days now, following the mailing
> list, searching and tinkering, etc. I'm really excited about this
> language!
>
> I'm running the latest packaged release, and I'd like to start writing
> some more serious "spikes" in
Hi all,
I've been playing with Clojure for a few days now, following the mailing
list, searching and tinkering, etc. I'm really excited about this
language!
I'm running the latest packaged release, and I'd like to start writing
some more serious "spikes" in Clojure, but I'm starting to get the
i
