Alan,
The macro is great (output could use a bit of formatting for readability,
but, hey, I'm not complaining). Thank you very much.
Tuba
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
On Jul 28, 8:11 pm, Resty Cena restyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Masanori,
Yes, I
Hello,
I'm trying to pass a variable through a series of functions, which may
change the value of the variable. However, the next function in line
uses the original value, rather than the changed value. Here's a
pseudo-code of what I'm doing.
(defn process-1 [s]
; change value of s then return
I'm trying to pass a variable through a series of functions, which may
change the value of the variable. However, the next function in line
uses the original value, rather than the changed value. Here's a
pseudo-code of what I'm doing.
(defn process-1 [s]
; change value of s then return it
http://clojure.org/state may help you to know Clojure's value.
; AFAIK Java's string is also immutable...isn't it?
--
Name: OGINO Masanori (荻野 雅紀)
E-mail: masanori.og...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
Hi,
2011/7/28 Tuba Lambanog tuba.lamba...@gmail.com
Hello,
I'm trying to pass a variable through a series of functions, which may
change the value of the variable. However, the next function in line
uses the original value, rather than the changed value. Here's a
pseudo-code of what I'm
On 07/28/2011 11:29 AM, Tuba Lambanog wrote:
I'm trying to pass a variable through a series of functions, which may
change the value of the variable. However, the next function in line
uses the original value, rather than the changed value. Here's a
pseudo-code of what I'm doing.
I think you
I'm trying to write a spelling 'standardizer' for a language that has
no standardized spelling. There are about 25 spelling rules, and a few
more may be added. . The input words, streamed one at a time from a
text file, go through these rules, and may change if conditions are
met. To take English
Hi, Thorsten,
Why, if that is the case at
all, do you want to pass an argument through functions that do not work
with it?
The determination of whether a called function will apply is left as a
responsibility of the function itself, rather than the calling
function. The motivation is that a
On Jul 28, 12:22 pm, Thorsten Wilms t...@freenet.de wrote:
On 07/28/2011 06:34 PM, Tuba Lambanog wrote:
The determination of whether a called function will apply is left as a
responsibility of the function itself, rather than the calling
function. The motivation is that a function may be
Hi, Thorsten,
Yes, you're right, once inside a function, the function is already being
applied. I mean that within the function, there's a test for whether the
input variable needs to be changed or not. Sort of vacuous application if
conditions are not met.
Yes, an enriched facility for pattern
Hi, Alan,
I can see that your suggestion will work. The key, as I understand it, is
the embedding of functions, thus:
(fix-ize (fix-ou word)))
which is indeed a Lisp-y way of doing things. It seems imperatively I miss
elegant one-liners such as this.
I'm right now close to getting Laurent's
Hi, Laurent,
Your suggestion of manually piping intermediate results works. Thank you
very much!
Tuba
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Laurent PETIT laurent.pe...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
2011/7/28 Tuba Lambanog tuba.lamba...@gmail.com
Hello,
I'm trying to pass a variable through a series of
Laurent's way and Alan's way have different surfaces, but same mean.
(- word fix-ou fix-ize)
(fix-ize (fix-ou word))
You can check it using clojure.walk/macroexpand-all.
user= (macroexpand-all '(- labour fix-ou fix-ize))
(fix-ize (fix-ou labour))
Indeed you can choose only one way, I suggest
Hi, Masanori,
Yes, I noticed the similarity. I'm using Laurent's 'manual way' for now.
I'll look at Alan's and Laurent's more concise solution in a few days. The
manual way is easy to debug as all I have to do is println the
intermediate results.
Thanks.
Tuba
2011/7/28 OGINO Masanori
On Jul 28, 8:11 pm, Resty Cena restyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Masanori,
Yes, I noticed the similarity. I'm using Laurent's 'manual way' for now.
I'll look at Alan's and Laurent's more concise solution in a few days. The
manual way is easy to debug as all I have to do is println the
15 matches
Mail list logo
