I'm pretty sure codemirror's addons (eg clojure mode) can just be included as
script tags; so therefore they could be packaged as cljsjs, with a dependency
on codemirror itself, no?
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received th
On Tuesday, January 6, 2015 1:20:04 PM UTC+2, Thomas Heller wrote:
> >
> > That's right but for some projects the assumption that .min.js means
> > "minified" is just not true. E.g. React ships with different logging levels
> > enabled based on wether you're including the development or producti
>
> That's right but for some projects the assumption that .min.js means
> "minified" is just not true. E.g. React ships with different logging levels
> enabled based on wether you're including the development or production build.
> I'm sure there are more projects that include extra debugging
> FWIW there is absolutely no need to ship a production/development version
of the code. The Closure Compiler is perfectly capable of minifying any JS
source (NOT advanced optimize, just minify).
That's right but for some projects the assumption that .min.js means
"minified" is just not true. E.g.
FWIW there is absolutely no need to ship a production/development version of
the code. The Closure Compiler is perfectly capable of minifying any JS source
(NOT advanced optimize, just minify).
Therefore the full JS + externs would be enough.
As a build tool author I don't quite agree with usin
On Monday, January 5, 2015 9:19:56 AM UTC-8, Martin Klepsch wrote:
> CLJSJS [1] is an effort to package Javascript libraries + their respective
> extern files and provide tooling to integrate them into your project.
>
> Traditionally interoperability features are a big deal for Clojure.
> In Cloju
