RE: [DISCUSS] Persistent Networks without a running VM

2013-02-03 Thread Likitha Shetty
Hi Sailaja, Please find my answers inline Thank you, Likitha >-Original Message- >From: Sailaja Mada >Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 4:54 PM >To: Likitha Shetty; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Persistent Networks without a running VM > >Hi Likitha, > >Few mo

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1142) Testing LDAP Auth Failed - due to "%" being illegal character in queryfilter

2013-02-03 Thread Mice Xia (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13570029#comment-13570029 ] Mice Xia commented on CLOUDSTACK-1142: -- Here is how i configured LDAP in CS 3.0.

RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread Sudha Ponnaganti
Wanted to check when would this be implemented?? Several QA folks depend on the packages and need this working. We have been still building using waf but today that is also not working as some references are removed. Is it possible to accelerate this process or leave old way of packaging in p

RE: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Sateesh Chodapuneedi
+1 for review process through Gerrit > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: 04 February 2013 00:20 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus Sorensen > wro

Re: CloudStack on Ubuntu - adding host fails

2013-02-03 Thread Shanker Balan
Hi Paul, Looking at the below exception, I am reminded of an open bug where /root/.ssh needs to be created before adding a host to the cluster. "/usr/lib/cloud/common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/xcposs/../../../systemvm/id_rsa.cloud to /root/.ssh on 10.0.2.99 with permission 0600" https://

RE: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Devdeep Singh
+1 for gerrit. Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 12:20 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus Sorensen

[OFFLINE] February 7th and 8th

2013-02-03 Thread Joe Brockmeier
Flying back from Australia on Thursday and recovering from jet lag on Friday. May be checking mail Thursday in the air once I'm back in the U.S. (apparently they haven't solved the problem of Wi-Fi on International flights yet...) but make no promises. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.ne

[REMINDER] Weekly IRC meeting

2013-02-03 Thread Joe Brockmeier
Hey all, Just a quick reminder - weekly IRC meeting is Wednesday at 17:00 UTC. Still in Australia until Thursday morning, so I won't be joining again this week. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Re: VPC Functionality Not Pluggable

2013-02-03 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Looks like a shortcut. Definitely needs fixing On 1/31/13 6:34 PM, "Mills, Joseph" wrote: >I was looking through the code that handles creating VPCs and noticed that >it did not seem pluggable at the moment. For example, there are a few >places where the assumption is made that the only possible

[REMINDER] Weekly News

2013-02-03 Thread Joe Brockmeier
Hey all, Just a friendly reminder: CloudStack Weekly News deadline is wrapping up. Current draft is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Apache+CloudStack+Weekly+News+-+4+February+2013 I'm going to close the issue + post on the Apache CloudStack blog at (about) 3 p.m. Ea

Re: [MERGE] Regions branch to master

2013-02-03 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
+1 On 1/31/13 8:07 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: > >Kishan, > >Lets work on leveraging events-framwork for account-sync post merge of >both features. For now go ahead with the merge if there are no concerns >other than using events-framework. > >Thanks, >Murali > >On 01/02/13 8:12 AM, "Kishan Kavala

Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Alex Huang
+1 on gerrit. For example very grateful that mice put his changes on vm snapshots on reviewboard. I really disagree with code commit bring a privilege of committers. --Alex David Nalley wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus So

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> ... >>> >>> So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require 1.5, so in some ways it's >>> worth than clint (clint is in EPEL, but no new vers

Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:29 AM, David Nalley wrote: ... > > > I've had some folks express interesting in setting up Gerrit for code reviews. > That said - it's not like we can't review code that is already > committed - we get commit mails after all. Gerrit just helps automate > some of that. Dav

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1096) guest traffic types on multiple networks don't work,this bug is not fixed in 4.0.1

2013-02-03 Thread terryye (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13569941#comment-13569941 ] terryye commented on CLOUDSTACK-1096: - yes ,i am sure. I am build 4.0.1 and inst

Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread David Nalley
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> Are you thinking there should be a regular moratorium or something similar >> just before the cut, so that the quality of the features as a whole can be >> evaluated, or are you just c

Re: Password has been reset to undefined

2013-02-03 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I can't comment on the 'undefined' part, but the idea is that cloud-set-guest-password runs when the VM starts. Therefore, you stop the instance, run the password reset, that pushes the new password to the virtual router on that network, then when the VM comes up, cloud-set-guest-password checks wi

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread David Nalley
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley wrote: > ... >> >> So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require 1.5, so in some ways it's >> worth than clint (clint is in EPEL, but no new version of pygments in >> EPEL/CentOS-Extras/CentOS-Plus) > > I

Password has been reset to undefined

2013-02-03 Thread Sinisa Denic
Please, I prepared centos6.3 template as password enabled. When create instance and try to Reset password, it says that machine must be stopped. Now I wander, how it is possible to CS to run cloud-set-guest-password on stopped instace? If I stop VM and repeat Reset password I get "Password h

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1146) auto update of KVM agent

2013-02-03 Thread Kevin Kluge (JIRA)
Kevin Kluge created CLOUDSTACK-1146: --- Summary: auto update of KVM agent Key: CLOUDSTACK-1146 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1146 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New F

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley wrote: ... > > So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require 1.5, so in some ways it's > worth than clint (clint is in EPEL, but no new version of pygments in > EPEL/CentOS-Extras/CentOS-Plus) I want people to use pip to install the cli because it's the easi

RE: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Sudha Ponnaganti
+1 for 4.1 branching. Master would not be stable and closing 4.1 would be very difficult if the branch is cut much later as teams would be checking in new features in to master. There is of course possibility to hold these features by other means like holding merge and holding review branches.

Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Sheng Yang
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Hugo Trippaers > wrote: >> Heya all, >> >> I find it way too early to cut a 4.1 release branch. I now that this is what >> we agreed to do, but the way we are going at it doesn't sit right with me. >> The si

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread Chip Childers
Thanks for bringing this back to the list Hugo! Hope you guys had a good time at FOSDEM. On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Heya all, > > As Devid already mentioned we met up at Build-A-Cloud-Day in Ghent with Wido, > Noa and a few other folks. During this day (with lots of

Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Chip Childers
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey Marcus, > > We do have another month or soto fix things. My main worry is the amount of > things that we still have to fix. The current consensus is that we have a > release manager who does the cherry picking of fixes from master to t

Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Chip Childers
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Are you thinking there should be a regular moratorium or something similar > just before the cut, so that the quality of the features as a whole can be > evaluated, or are you just concerned that the last minute features didn't > get proper

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1145) It would be great if the Computing power Allocation Algorithm used in version 4.0 of CloudStack is explained in a document.

2013-02-03 Thread Kausal Malladi (JIRA)
Kausal Malladi created CLOUDSTACK-1145: -- Summary: It would be great if the Computing power Allocation Algorithm used in version 4.0 of CloudStack is explained in a document. Key: CLOUDSTACK-1145 URL: https://

Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Chip Childers
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Heya all, > > I find it way too early to cut a 4.1 release branch. I now that this is what > we agreed to do, but the way we are going at it doesn't sit right with me. > The simple fact that we have some mayor code changes forced into maste

CloudStack on Ubuntu - adding host fails

2013-02-03 Thread Paul Angus
Hi, I'm doing some work on using Ubuntu with CloudStack as a management host, XCP host and KVM host. Adding a Ubuntu host to a Ubuntu CloudStack management server environment fails, apparently due to a load of missing scripts... Any Ideas?? http://pastebin.com/gE3nnPGK 2013-02-03 15:27:53,69

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1096) guest traffic types on multiple networks don't work,this bug is not fixed in 4.0.1

2013-02-03 Thread Marcus Sorensen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13569792#comment-13569792 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-1096: - Can you confirm that you a

[DISCUSS] Packaging password/ssh reset scripts

2013-02-03 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks: One of the discussions that came up while we were in Ghent was whether or not to package the SSH key reset and password reset utilities, or whether we should focus our PW/SSH efforts on cloud-init. The points for consideration are essentially: * If we begin packaging them, they will be

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-1021) the vlan is not creat to right nic. when i creat multi guest network.

2013-02-03 Thread terryye (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] terryye closed CLOUDSTACK-1021. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.1.0 > the vlan is not creat to right nic. when i c

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1096) guest traffic types on multiple networks don't work,this bug is not fixed in 4.0.1

2013-02-03 Thread terryye (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13569753#comment-13569753 ] terryye commented on CLOUDSTACK-1096: - I am a host using to agent. It had two nic

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread David Nalley
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>> Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and >>> s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts. >>> I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a length

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 02/03/2013 08:34 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: Heya all, As Devid already mentioned we met up at Build-A-Cloud-Day in Ghent with Wido, Noa and a few other folks. During this day (with lots of nice talks) we had a chance to sit down and dis

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread David Nalley
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>> Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and >>> s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts. >>> I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a length

RE: [VOTE][ACS401] Apache CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating release (Second Round)

2013-02-03 Thread Hugo Trippaers
+1 (binding) Tested advanced zone deployment with XenServers including Nicira integration. Creating, starting, stopping virtual machines using API and UI. Cheers, Hugo From: Joe Brockmeier [j...@zonker.net] Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 9:42 AM To: cl

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and >> s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts. >> >>> I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a lengthy >>> email ;-) All packages will have a directory in >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

2013-02-03 Thread David Nalley
> Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and > s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts. > >> I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a lengthy >> email ;-) All packages will have a directory in /usr/share/cloudstack-%{name} > > Why not /usr/share/cloudsta

Re: [VOTE][ACS401] Apache CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating release (Second Round)

2013-02-03 Thread Joe Brockmeier
Hi all - thanks for the additional votes. I'm going to shut the vote down tomorrow morning (my time) and start the IPMC vote barring any show-stoppers before then. Thanks, Joe On Sat, Feb 2, 2013, at 02:52 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > >

Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created

2013-02-03 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Oh yes, of course. What these people would be looking for are bug fix releases. They want to wait for 4.0.1, not 4.1.0. On Feb 3, 2013 12:54 AM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: > One more thing, I think people waiting for non .0 releases probably > will be disappointed. My impression was that our versio