Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:26:50AM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote: >> Hi Chip, Prasanna, >> >> Yes, the change is pretty straightforward, the reasoning is to make default >> password encoding more secure because the SHA256salted authent

Re: [PROPOSAL] EIP across zones

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > I would like to propose enhancing current EIP functionality (currently > available in basic zone). I have made a case for this feature earlier [2] and > captured requirements in the feature bug [2]. This proposal would like to > introduce f

Re: CLOUDSTACK-1747: fresh deploydb bug in 4.1 requires cherry-pick commits from master

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We had a discussion on irc. > > To implement something intermediary will be around the same effort as > finishing the job and there are various reasons why just running the > create-schema.sql and update*.sql is not enough. S

Re: [DISCUSS] Translation authorship

Might be nice to get a list of them and put it in the commit message. (e.g. if you commit the pt_BR translation, list all of the contributors in the commit message, that should be automatable. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:57:58AM -0400, Sebas

Re: [DOC] Help with updating Install Guide sections needed

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Scratch that - Sorry Jessica / Radhika. > > David's looking for technical reviewers. > > David -- I think that the challenge here is that the actual material > for each of those docs is very broad. Perhaps the right way to > approach this i

Re: [ACS41][QA] Please update status on blockers and critical bugs for 4.1.0!

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:51 A

Re: [ACS41][QA] Please update status on blockers and critical bugs for 4.1.0!

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Chip I think your query for defects is looking at "Affected Version" as 4.1 > rather than "Fix Version" as 4.1 > > I had moved out some of the defects assigned to frank out to 4.2 since he is > on vacation and won't return in time for

Re: Git checkout of version 3.6

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, did not we promote 3.6 to 4.0 as a version? > No.

Re: Git checkout of version 3.6

ch to the 3.0.x version...that seems to be the > closest. > > Thanks, David! > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:47 PM, David Nalley wrote: > >> There is no such version of CloudStack. >> >> --David >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mike Tutkows

Re: Git checkout of version 3.6

There is no such version of CloudStack. --David On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > A customer is using version 3.6 and I'd like to take a look at that version > of CS. > > I don't actually see such a version in the repo, however. > > Can someone tell me what branch

Re: KVM Question

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > This will probably be an easy question for someone "out there." :) > > I'm trying to install cloud-agent on Ubuntu 12.04.1, which is running KVM. > > I get the following error message. > > Any thoughts on this? > > Thanks! > > mtutko

EL6 RPM BuildRequire changes for agent SELinux policy creation

Hi folks, Prasanna in particular: Prasanna - I have this patch [1] pending. I haven't committed it yet because I fear that it will break the RPM packaging job on Jenkins. Sadly, I don't seem to have access to the RPM builders that jenkins uses. Specifically I've added the following build requirem

Re: Wiki Content Licensing

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Mark Hinkle wrote: > On 3/14/13 1:27 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > > >>On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Mark Hinkle >>wrote: >>> I bring this up because as I look at the wiki there is no copyright >>>notice nor do

Re: Wiki Content Licensing

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Mark Hinkle wrote: > I bring this up because as I look at the wiki there is no copyright notice > nor does a search bring up a link to a copyright notice on the wiki. Is the > wiki content licensed under the Apache License 2.0 like the manuals or does > it fall

Re: [DISCUSS] Establish the cloudstack-announce mailing list

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:44 AM, David Nalley wrote: > That really depends on whether our resolution gets in front of the board > this month or next. 4.0.2 is pretty close, and 4.1.0 would probably ship > before the April board meeting. Following up on the conversation in IRC. Perhap

Re: [DISCUSS] Establish the cloudstack-announce mailing list

re graduation. If > yes, I suspect we ought to create this now. If not, let's wait. > > > On 14 March 2013 14:34, David Nalley wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Chip Childers > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:27:11PM +, Noah Slater

Re: [DISCUSS] Establish the cloudstack-announce mailing list

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:27:11PM +, Noah Slater wrote: >> We're gonna have to do that anyway, and I believe the process is automated. >> So why wait? > > I wasn't aware that it was automated, so I guess we don't have a reason > to wait

Re: [DISCUSS] Establish the cloudstack-announce mailing list

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Dear community, > > I would like to establish the cloudstack-announce mailing list. > > The primary purpose of this mailing list will be to post release > announcements to. > > It is important that we provide high signal channels through which

Re: Local versus Shared Storage Type for Compute Offering

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:20 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Koushik Das wrote: >> See inline >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, Marc

Re: Local versus Shared Storage Type for Compute Offering

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Koushik Das wrote: > See inline > >> -Original Message- >> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] >> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:30 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Local versus Shared Storage Type for Comp

Re: Local versus Shared Storage Type for Compute Offering

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I was a little surprised to see the Storage Type field when creating a > Compute Offering recently. > > The options are Local or Shared. > > I guess I was thinking that if you had a preference for a VM running on > local storage of t

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1604: deploy VM failed when global setting "vm.allocation.algorithm" is set to "userdispersing"

not apply Patch failed at 0001 CLOUDSTACK-1604: deploy VM failed when global setting "vm.allocation.algorithm" is set to "userdispersing" The copy of the patch that failed is found in: - David Nalley On March 14, 2013, 1:17 a.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > ---

Re: [OFFLINE] Thursday, Friday, Monday

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > So I'm going to continue to have sporadic (even less than today) > connectivity over the next three work days... that means *some* > emailing is possible, but it also means that I can't work on things > like commiting patches or reviewing bu

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request] CLOUDSTACK-1557

ACK Applies and builds cleanly Committed in 4.1 Thanks, --David On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9823/ > > > Reviewed and checked in master. > > Commit hash:7bb8ed4d05ac9ea1242201e0e4fafc36916d5c51 > > > > ---

Re: git commit: refs/heads/master - CLOUDSTACK-1653: Redundant router: Fix check_heartbeat.sh malfunctional due to delayed cron job

Does this need to come in to 4.1? --David On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:31 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master bf15eb0c7 -> 630e75596 > > > CLOUDSTACK-1653: Redundant router: Fix check_heartbeat.sh malfunctional due > to delayed cron job > > The interval between keepalived.ts and

Re: git commit: refs/heads/master - CLOUDSTACK-1551: Failed to list clusters due to NPE at createClusterResponse(ApiResponseHelper.java:837) when cluster is added automatically as a part of addHostCom

Abhi: Bharat: Does this need to come into 4.1 as well? --David On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:40 AM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 27b753a43 -> 6715f9808 > > > CLOUDSTACK-1551: Failed to list clusters due to NPE at > createClusterResponse(ApiResponseHelper.java:837) when cluster

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request] CLOUDSTACK-1427: Failed to delete Guestnetwork which has LB with Netscaler

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > CLOUDSTACK-1427: Failed to delete Guestnetwork which has LB with > Netscaler > > There is no need for getIpDeployer to depend on the fact a NetScaler > device is allocated (network is implemented state) or not-allocated > (network is in shutdo

Re: [OFFLINE] Sporadically online / offline tomorrow (March 13)

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:51 AM, David Nalley wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >>> No volunteers to do commits for 4.2 today? >> >> I'll take it >> >&g

Re: [OFFLINE] Sporadically online / offline tomorrow (March 13)

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > No volunteers to do commits for 4.2 today? > I'll take it --David

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:11:22PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> Chip, et al: >> >> RPM Packaging is currently broken in 4.1 - this fixes CLOUDSTACK-1630 >> - which doesn't solve the breakage. But once packagi

Re: rpm packaging job failing?

Prasanna - there appears to be nothing wrong with the RPM building when I do it on a freshly setup machine. No idea what's going on with jenkins, but there's nothing inherently wrong with RPM builds. --David On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Thanks Marcus, the jenkin

[ACS41][Patch Request] CLOUDSTACK-1631 - fix RPM packaging

Chip, et al: CLOUDSTACK-1631 is for the RPM build failures (that have been occurring for some days now.) The error is: error: create archive failed on file /home/jenkins/build/workspace/package-rhel63-4.1/dist/rpmbuild/SOURCES/cloudstack-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT.tgz: cpio: Bad magic Bad Magic is _generall

[ACS41][Patch Request]

Chip, et al: RPM Packaging is currently broken in 4.1 - this fixes CLOUDSTACK-1630 - which doesn't solve the breakage. But once packaging works again, this needs to be applied to fix upgrades. 797eb009e239d904c52de8c5be4cb0c82a63fea4 <-- applied on master

Re: How do we handle updates to API documentation for existing

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:13 PM, David Grizzanti wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering how we handled updating existing API documentation for > CloudStack versions that are already out in the wild (i.e. 4.0.0)? > > There is an open bug for the createStoragePool API command documentation, > howeve

Re: Security Group Support

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:52 PM, George Reese wrote: > From listZones -> > > cloud-stack-version="3.0.5.20120904142539">1f9a1d2eb-c49e-4b87-ac9b-9c47e2d912a3australia-canberra-2AdvancedfalseEnabled257b387d-3d9d-3585-8c65-cc26d38a3a97VirtualRouterfalse > > And then I create a Security Group -> >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether > Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The > result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to > govern itself (

Re: Security Group Support

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, George Reese wrote: > I see environments with securitygroupsenabled = false but security groups > work. There must be more to it than that flag. > > -George > You see that using securitygroupsenabled = false with listZones and SG work? Alena: Thoughts? --David

PPMC Consensus for proposed PMC Chair

Hi folks In our graduation tasks, the PPMC has discussed candidates for recommending in our resolution as the chair for Apache CloudStack and has come to consensus around recommending Chip Childers as the chair. The board actually appoints the chair, and we are merely making a recommendation, and

Re: Security Group Support

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:52 AM, George Reese wrote: > Is there a reliable way to determine across versions of CloudStack whether or > not a specific implementation supports the provisioning of security groups? > > Thanks, > -George > listZones should tell you (listCapabilities as well) See

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1623 MySQL Database connection can fail to "localhost" on a V6 enabled host

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9852/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- MySQL Database connection ca

Re: git commit: refs/heads/master - Disable acceptence of old-fashion URL form for console access

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: > This is to disable no-longer supported URL form and only take information > from the sole "token" parameter inside the URL > > Kelven > I now understand what you did. Why did you do it? Is there an underlying security issue here? (presumably th

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:51 PM, David Nalley wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:30:27PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote: >>>> Well, if we want

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:30:27PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote: >> Well, if we want it someone needs to do it. I'm looking at hadoop (as >> David suggested) [snip...] > > Take a look at Hadoop's contributor guide [1], specifically the > "Contr

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:18:46PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:54:05AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote: >> >> > >

Re: Contributing/Generating API Documenation

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:00 PM, David Grizzanti wrote: > Hey All, > > I'm still a bit new to the project but wanted to help out by trying to > resolve of the API docs bugs that are outstanding. I was taking a look at > the documentation on the Wiki for contributing to documentation and it seems

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:54:05AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote: >> > >> > I'd add: >> > Large scale of our code base >> > Difficulty of testing at scale without plenty of hardware (which was a >> > problem >> > stated during incubation proposal)

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:42:11AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote: >> - I again push that we must use Gerrit to test the code before it >> gets merge into the branch but I'll leave that for someone else to do that. > > So the first step to

Re: git commit: refs/heads/master - rat check: exclude the WEB-INF directories in check

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Hmm - I see client/WEB-INF has the web.xml which isn't generated. The > mvn rat check doesn't pass on the dev environment because of many of > the .txt files within awsapi/. These aren't part of the repo but are > generated during the bui

Re: git commit: refs/heads/master - rat check: exclude the WEB-INF directories in check

There is also a number of non-generated files in WEB-INF directories... can you explain this a bit more? --David On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:06 AM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 7fde29888 -> 81a42b959 > > > rat check: exclude the WEB-INF directories in check > > WEB-INF director

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > On 06/03/13 11:52 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: > >>First +1 on BVT. >> >>Second, should we consider the idea of having a staging area for people to >>check-in? Which is that making master always the stable(reasonable) branch >>for main developmen

Re: [DISCUSS]Incremental build

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > How about we break the cloudstack job on jenkins down to -server, > -core, -utils, -plugins etc? > > Each of the projects takes less than a minute or two to execute. It's > the combined project that takes >20m to run on jenkins delaying b

Re: [DISCUSS]Incremental build

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Maven 3 doesn't support incremental > build(https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/incremental-builds.html), so it takes a > long time(4-7mins) to make a build, even I just make a small changes in the > source code. I know, you can specify which projec

[4.0.x] waf doesn't seem to be honoring --build-number=$BUILD_NUMBER

I am running ./waf rpm --package-version=4.0.1 --build-number=2 from within the 4.0.1 release tarball and --build-number doesn't seem to be honored. I have a workaround, but anyone have insight into why waf isn't passing this to %{_rel}?? --David

Re: Building on Cloudstack

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Serge A. Salamanka [mailto:salsa-...@tut.by] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 2:16 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Building on Cloudstack >> >> On 06.03.2013 08:50, Seif Eddi

Re: Document for deleteUser command

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Isaac Chiang wrote: > Hi all: > When I looked up for deleteUser command on the website, I found > that both description > and response format are wrong. > > http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/docs/api/apidocs-4.0.0/root_admin/deleteUser.html > > The de

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloudstack agent - standardized directory for plugin jars

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > On Mar 6, 2013 8:04 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: >> >> On 03/06/2013 09:03 AM, Dave Cahill wrote: >>> >>> Moving discussion from Jira ticket to dev list as suggested by Hugo. >>> >>> Request from Kawai-san: There is no place t

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Hi All, > > As most of you are aware, the master branch keeps getting broken by checkins > for various reasons. Committers need to be more responsible about their > checkins but I don't think we can depend on that happening. There are > vari

Re: app license issue

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Yichi Lu wrote: > Does anyone know that whether it is OK, from licensing point of view, to > add a GPLv2 package into CloudStack? > My understanding is that Apache/CloudStack is under Apache v2 licensing, > which is incompatible to GPLv2. > The particular package (o

Re: [QA][DISCUSS] Should we document formal release criteria?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Some IRC discussion triggered this thought: > > Should we document our formal release criteria? By that, I mean - > should we document the criteria that we use to claim that we are in a > position to cut an actual Release Candidat

Re: [DISCUSS} API Throttling minimum number of calls per unit of time

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Min Chen wrote: > This issue has been fixed in both 4.1 and master. A new global setting > "api.throttling.enabled" is introduced. > By default, it is set to false, so no API throttling is enabled. To enable > it, just change the setting to true, and restart MS. FS

Re: Review Request: Two test cases from snapshots imporevement feature

ts of. Both of these files are missing the ASF license header, please add that in. test/integration/component/test_concurrent_snapshot.py <https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/#comment36930> This doesn't look like valid python to me. Are you sure this is the intended content?

Re: [DISCUSS] db changes on the 4.0.x release line

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > So this is broken off from the thread on Support Timelines for the > 4.0.x group of releases: > > The issue is regarding upgrades. With the introduction of the > DatabaseCreator I notice that we don't have to do any sort of changes > to

Re: [ACS41][QA] Test plan for List API Performance Optimization

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Sowmya Krishnan wrote: > >> Great - perhaps we can talk with Prasanna about getting those completely >> automated with jenkins. > Sure. I'll get the scripts to some shape and will get in touch with Prasanna > to automate with jenkins > >> Can we get the baseline nu

Re: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > Thanks for the tip David on the signatures upload! > > I was a able to successfully release the NetScaler's Nitro jar file. > > Once I complete the release of NetScaler SDX's jar file as well, the stage > will be set to make the NetScal

Re: NetScaler lib/sdk jars are apache licensed

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > There are two jars to be uploaded nitro.jar and sdx_nitro.jar. > I started with uploading nitro.jar to sonatype and ultimately to MavenCentral, > it is 90% done as of last week and I am stuck at the step Release it (8) > > https://docs.

Re: [ACS41][QA] Test plan for List API Performance Optimization

Inline reply. On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Sowmya Krishnan wrote: > Thanks for taking time to review the plan David. Answers inline. > >> -Original Message----- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:26

Re: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:34:41AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Feb 28, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 03:00 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> >> I stated my opinion on this previously [1], but

Re: [Discuss] CloudStack Spins Project

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Writing this email to get a feel of what community thinks of creating > CloudStack spins. Basically, in my case I have a need for some features that > are in 4.2 master branch but are not available in 4.1 code base. > > > While I wholehearte

Re: [1/2] CLOUDSTACK-24: mipn feature for isolated and vpc networks

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi David, > > The test cases for this feature are added in the AddIpToVmNicTest.java file. > In review board after your comments uploaded a new patch (r2) with the test > cases added. > Please let me know If I miss any thing. > Jayapa

Re: [1/2] CLOUDSTACK-24: mipn feature for isolated and vpc networks

Abhi, Jayapal: Where are tests for this feature? I asked about the tests on February 10 on the review itself, Chip asked about tests on Feb 11th on the review as well. The patch has subsequently had three revisions, yet nary a response to either my Chip's questions or adding tests to the patch its

Re: [DISCUSS] fixing the tomcat situation, post 4.1?

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Noa Resare wrote: > So, when working with the 4.1 packaging issues I have more than once been > intensely frustrated with the current tomcat situation. > > To recap: Some cloustack components are set up as web applications and > requires a servlet container as their

Re: Jenkins builds

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > Hi, could someone check on your Jenkins builds? A couple of them look like > they could be stuck (run time >> any previous successful run). > > Thanks! > Billie Thanks for the heads up - I killed the two long running jobs. I thought we ha

Re: [DISCUSS} API Throttling minimum number of calls per unit of time

what it does. >> If you enable throttling then .. you should decide values based on your >> environment. >> >> Thanks, >> .. Parth >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Friday, March 01, 201

Re: [DISCUSS][Action Required] Timeline for moving jira messages to a the issues@ list.

Folks yet another reminder - it's REALLY time to subscribe to cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org Please take 30 seconds of your time to do it now. --David On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks, > > We agreed during the 4.0 development cycle to shi

Re: git commit: refs/heads/4.1 - CloudStack CLOUDSTACK-774 Supporting kickstart in CloudStack baremetal

Why did this hit 4.1? On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:04 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/4.1 a47f32343 -> 75aad6763 > > > CloudStack CLOUDSTACK-774 > Supporting kickstart in CloudStack baremetal > > make kikcstart working with ubuntu > > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-401) Storage options missing from table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13591053#comment-13591053 ] David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-401: - What version are you using? A

Re: [DISCUSS} API Throttling minimum number of calls per unit of time

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Parth Jagirdar wrote: > All, > > API throttling number can be set to anything at this point. > > Suggestions here is to have this number set to a value that is "greater than" > number of API that can be fired by any potential action on UI. > > Minimum API for throt

Re: Help tooltip for form fields

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Brian Federle wrote: > Hi All, > > I have completed the tooltip feature, which appears for most form fields in > the UI. > > Note that right now we had to embed the documentation strings into the source > due to technical limitations. In the future we'll work to

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1420) Ensure trademarks are properly attributed in publican brand.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Nalley resolved CLOUDSTACK-1420. -- Resolution: Fixed fixed - updated svg and trademark text in 4.0, 4.1, and master

New PPMC member: Marcus Sorenson

Hi folks The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Marcus to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Please join me in congratulating Marcus! (and apologies on the delay in getting this out in a timely manner) Regards

Re: [VOTE] Change the project bylaws to modify the PMC Chair voting process and add a term length

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > As previously discussed [1], we'd like to make a change to our bylaws > [2] to modify the method of selecting a PMC chair. We also want to add > a term for the chair. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/ifwwce657u36yuwz > [2] >

Re: 4.1 build broken?

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Looks like it's this one: 13ec069129bf46ffd327d52cf26f5fc363a13284, if > I go back to the commit prior to that it builds. I reverted that on my > local git and it built fine. > > Come on guys, this is happening entirely too often. I can und

Re: Review Request: Revert classpath.conf.in to before .deb packaing merge

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9678/#review17200 --- Ship it! Looks sane to me. - David Nalley On Feb. 28, 2013, 3

Re: Review Request: rpm packaging fix: Add symlink for log4j-cloud.xml in client webapp

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9677/#review17199 --- Ship it! Looks sane to me. - David Nalley On Feb. 28, 2013, 7

Re: [ACS41][QA]Limit Resources per domain/accounts TestPlan Review request

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Sanjay Tripathi wrote: > David, > >> -Original Message----- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:31 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA

Re: Summary of why where and how development happens matters

On Feb 27, 2013 10:16 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:21:28AM +0530, Chip Childers wrote: > > The TL;DR version: > > > > The issue that we ran into with several features being developed > > "outside the community" for 4.1 was a major deal, and it had several > > impl

Re: [ACS41][QA]Limit Resources per domain/accounts TestPlan Review request

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Sailaja Mada wrote: > Hi, > > Limit Resources per domain/accounts TestPlan is posted for review @ > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Limit+Resources+to+domain+or+accounts > > Please review and provide inputs . > > Thanks and Regards, > Saila

Re: Discuss changing the project bylaws for the PMC Chair voting process

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:36:36PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Chip Childers >> > I'd also point out, as one of our mentors did in the private list >> > discussion, t

Re: Windows 8-2012 Support Test plan

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Kiran Koneti wrote: > Hi Min, > > The test plan for the Windows 8-2012 Support Test > plan > is located at the below mentioned location. Please review the same and also > le

Re: [ACS41][QA] Test plan for List API Performance Optimization

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sowmya Krishnan wrote: > Hi, > > I've posted a test plan for tracking the performance numbers for the set of > List APIs which were optimized as mentioned in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-527 > Test plan is here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/c

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft trademark guidelines

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013, at 02:34 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Sorry for spamming two lists. >> >> We've been drafting some guidelines and had them reviewed by >> trademarks@ - and want

[DISCUSS] Support lifetime

Hi folks, With 4.0.2 being actively worked on in parallel with 4.1 - we need to have some discussions around setting expectations for support lifecycle of a given release. Our feature releases are relatively rapid (~every 4 months). At the same time, people deploying CloudStack like stability. Our

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1420) Ensure trademarks are properly attributed in publican brand.

David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-1420: Summary: Ensure trademarks are properly attributed in publican brand. Key: CLOUDSTACK-1420 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1420

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1419) Apache-ify and apply trademark logos in the UI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Nalley updated CLOUDSTACK-1419: - Component/s: UI > Apache-ify and apply trademark logos in the

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1419) Apache-ify and apply trademark logos in the UI

David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-1419: Summary: Apache-ify and apply trademark logos in the UI Key: CLOUDSTACK-1419 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1419 Project: CloudStack

Re: [DISCUSS] Draft trademark guidelines

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 04:55:37PM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Feb 26, 2013, at 3:34 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > Sorry for spamming two lists. >> &

[DISCUSS] Draft trademark guidelines

Hi folks, Sorry for spamming two lists. We've been drafting some guidelines and had them reviewed by trademarks@ - and wanted to get them out in public for comment and discussion. Draft is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Trademark+Guidelines+(DRAFT) So - Discuss...

Re: Ohloh

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Will Chan wrote: > Wow...it also looks like we have the most # of contributors as well. Then > again, I didn't click past page 3. > You can sort - and it reports that we have the most # of contributors as well, but it's really a false stat SVN has committer

Re: Cloudstack meetup / BOF at ApacheCon NA?

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Sean C. Sullivan wrote: > Any Cloudstack devs at Apachecon this week? Is there going to be a > Cloudstack meetup or BOF? > A few of us are about. Perhaps we can do a CloudStack lunch in one corner of the room where we have lunch today or tomorrw. Doesn't seem t

Re: git commit: refs/heads/4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-962:setAggBytesSent/setAggBytesReceived in NetworkUsageTask when not in case of dailyor hourly Removed duplicate userstatsdao injection

Kishan: Is there a reason this wasn't also added to 4.0 branch (it was filed against 4.0.0, but only applied to 4.1 and master) --David On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:57 AM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/4.1 c7935a9ab -> 03fdbfb29 > > > CLOUDSTACK-962:setAggBytesSent/setAggBytesReceived

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >