On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:19:57PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:45:46PM +0530, prasanna wrote:
> > On 13 March 2013 12:56, Pradeep Soundararajan
> > wrote:
> > > David,
> > >
> > > I did not come across this issue "cp
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:44:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >
> > Could you check if jna.jar is in the classpath in the init script
> > and that it also exists?
> >
> > Could you also try adding platform.jar to the classpath if that
> > doesn't
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:30:32PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 03/19/2013 01:37 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:11:19PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >>On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:26:30PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
cloudstack-qa/job/test-smoke-matrix/
One can drill down to each suite of this matrix for more information
and track failures.
Thanks,
--
Prasanna.,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:48:34AM -0400, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> Update:
>
> The setup is now reliably functional with xen and
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:43:03PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> The new form of marvin test after marvin-refactor should be like this:
>
> class MyFeatureSuite(cloudstackTestCase):
>
> @attr('tags=simulator,xenserver..')
> def TestMyFeature
ttps://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/#comment38165>
The test runner code (__main__) can be gotten rid of. It's not required
when the test runs on test infra.
- Prasanna Santhanam
On March 19, 2013, 12:45 p.m., sanjeev n wrote:
>
>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:11:19PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:26:30PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 03/18/2013 07:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > >On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 05:25:21PM +0530, Wido
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:56:09AM +, Simon Waterhouse wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working on the standalone NIC feature described in
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/AWS+Style+NIC+support
>
> The work is staged in
> https://github.com/siwater/incubator-cloudstack (branch
> sta
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:26:30PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/18/2013 07:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 05:25:21PM +0530, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>In the last meeting my #action was to m
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 01:55:38PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks, Prasanna in particular:
>
> Prasanna - I have this patch [1] pending. I haven't committed it yet
> because I fear that it will break the RPM packaging job on Jenkins.
> Sadly, I don't seem to have access to the RPM builders
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 05:25:21PM +0530, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the last meeting my #action was to merge the Debian packaging commits
> from master into 4.1, but I didn't get around doing so.
>
> I found some more time to test it all and it seems the packages are
> working pret
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9871/
---
(Updated March 15, 2013, 6:51 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaer
Will be offline to take care of some personal stuff.
--
Prasanna.,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:45:46PM +0530, prasanna wrote:
> On 13 March 2013 12:56, Pradeep Soundararajan
> wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > I did not come across this issue "cpio: Bad magic" even before or after
> > your doc changes. I am doing the build and packaging daily on both 4.1 and
> > master.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:58:28AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> lol jenkins :)
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:47:05AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >> Cato_Fong reports the following commit breaks t
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:47:05AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> Cato_Fong reports the following commit breaks the build:
>
> Abhi/Deepthi - please take a look and/or revert as necessary.
>
> CLOUDSTACK-1575 Failed to transit volume with uploadVolume (de
Cato_Fong reports the following commit breaks the build:
Abhi/Deepthi - please take a look and/or revert as necessary.
CLOUDSTACK-1575 Failed to transit volume with uploadVolume (details)
Commit 27b753a434de087a9cd8ec50bfa1deb2de7a7925 by aprateek
CLOUDSTACK-1575 Failed to transit volume with upl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9879/
---
(Updated March 13, 2013, 6:11 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:12:21PM +0530, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether
> Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The
> result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to
> gove
you set up a fake cloudstack issue on
reviewboard please?
4:30:06 PM vogxn: coming right up
4:30:09 PM Humbedooh: there doesn't seem to be any test group I can play with
4:33:18 PM ASFBot: JIRA: Prasanna Santhanam [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1644)
INFRA-5977: Testing ASFBot updates to reviewboard [
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9876/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
DAO - Data Access Object
TO - Transfer Object
Do we have MOs?
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:40:18AM +0530, Kelven Yang wrote:
> Per my understanding, VO stands for Value Object, however, it is really
> used as Entity Object (CRM term) in CloudStack
>
> Kelven
>
> On 3/11/13 2:00 PM, "Mike Tutkows
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:09:20AM +0530, Edison Su wrote:
> Thanks!!! It's a big step forward to get CI work.
Thanks! It is indeed. Hope we can keep it up and running without downtime.
> I have few questions regarding to marvin test though:
> Where do we put the marvin unit test cases? I can't f
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:58:55PM +0530, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 10:26 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk
> >
>
: create archive failed on file
> /home/jenkins/build/workspace/build-master-rhel63-rpms/dist/rpmbuild/SOURCES/cloudstack-4.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tgz:
> cpio: Bad magic
> Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
> Archiving artifacts
> Sending e-mails to: h...@apache.org
>
!
[1] https://github.com/vogxn/acs-infra-test/tree/4.1
[2] https://github.com/vogxn/cloud-autodeploy/tree/acs-infra-fmt
Thanks,
--
Prasanna.,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 08:17:49PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> The build pipeline for running marvin tests on physical hardware is
> now f
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:01:49AM -0500, prasanna wrote:
> On 8 March 2013 22:24, Alex Huang wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to start off a branch specifically to do BVT on
> > simulator and devCloud so that we can at least have system vms/vrs
> > and business logic tested.
>
> Hey Alex - will you be w
yup - thanks Kelven. Just saw it:
89f4ac0439852be13f2d78b57d8d1d3716d641df
I guess the if(true) block was adding transactioncontext to all our
classes?
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:49:18PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Thanks Kelven, the much awaited fix!
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Kelven Y
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:15:06AM +0530, Mathias Mullins wrote:
> All,
>
> Robert van der Meulen was kind enough to share this with us on the
> marketing mailing list, and personally I believe that it is
> important enough to see across the lists so that you can share with
> others across your or
Hi All,
Many might not be aware but there is a bot on the #cloudstack-dev IRC
channel that keeps an eye on our jenkins.cs.o builds. Cato_Fong will
alert the channel of any jobs that have recently broken.
I've connected the bot to our new master build (cloudstack-master).
This job is faster than t
Hey Hugo,
The RPM packaging job [1] has been failing on 4.1 and master. Can you take
a peek?
Thanks!
[1] http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-master-rhel63-rpms/
--
Prasanna.,
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 01:29:24AM -0500, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> devcloud-kvm has been upgraded to CentOS 6.4, has new master systemvm
> template preinstalled. Still getting intermittent default gateway
> rules with the new systemvm (there's a bug in for it, seems to be
> non-hypervisor specific)
: youribonnaffe
Date: Fri Mar 8 12:30:15 2013 +0100
- Prasanna Santhanam
On March 8, 2013, 11:45 a.m., Youri Bonnaffé wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9772/
---
(Updated March 8, 2013, 11:35 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sateesh Choda
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 06:20:44PM +0530, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > Hmm - I see client/WEB-INF has the web.xml which isn't generated. The
> > mvn rat check doesn't pass on the dev environment because of many of
t/81a42b95
> > Tree:
> > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/tree/81a42b95
> > Diff:
> > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/diff/81a42b95
> >
> > Branch: refs/heads/master
> > Commit: 81a42b95917f94a82bd0b45b
How about we break the cloudstack job on jenkins down to -server,
-core, -utils, -plugins etc?
Each of the projects takes less than a minute or two to execute. It's
the combined project that takes >20m to run on jenkins delaying broken
build emails.
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:13:41AM +0530, Alex
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 03:20:13PM +0530, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Is it possible to integrate with review board as well.
>
> When a patch is applied, comments gets in JIRA and review gets
> shipped and submitted ?
Yes - I'd like that too!
--
Prasanna.,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:00:08AM +0530, Ryan Dietrich wrote:
> A new column was added to storage_pool, called storage_provider_id.
> When trying to access a StoragePoolVO instance (when I go to attach
> a volume to a VM) I popped a null pointer. This may be related to
> CLOUDSTACK-1547, but I'm
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:19:19AM +0530, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > - improve simulator for runtime testability
> > - customize to model and inject failures
> > - make a habit of writing tests around bug reports (I started tagging tests
> > since api_refactoring on JIRA already.
> > look for the integ
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9727/#review17535
---
Ship it!
d51e964 on master
- Prasanna Santhanam
On March 7, 2013
l
> > receive the keys and set /root/.ssh/id_rsa.pub.cloud and
> > /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud again, to the same values. Again, I guess this is
> > fine, but wanted to point out the filename clash.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>
end in
.cloud. Can you fix this?
- Prasanna Santhanam
On March 4, 2013, 7:22 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
l
> > receive the keys and set /root/.ssh/id_rsa.pub.cloud and
> > /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud again, to the same values. Again, I guess this is
> > fine, but wanted to point out the filename clash.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>
There's a patch on review board lying about. Anyone want to apply it? I think
it work well.
--
Prasanna.,
On 07-Mar-2013, at 6:02, "Sheng Yang (JIRA)" wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:12:55AM +0530, Alex Huang wrote:
> With the discussion in the BVT thread and other evidence from the
> check-ins, I think there are some confusion on when to and what to
> write in a unit test.
>
Not just unit-tests alone, most testing in general. There was an
insightfu
?
- Prasanna Santhanam
On March 6, 2013, 11:58 a.m., Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
Great to see you kick this off Alex! I have a few ideas for this and
had been looking for help as well ..
I had a draft lying around of an email you sent me long ago about
tiered testing and I think your proposal fits very well on this:
The tl;dr of that conversation was as below
- improve simul
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9696/
---
(Updated March 6, 2013, 10:06 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta a
> On March 4, 2013, 7:38 a.m., Dave Cahill wrote:
> > This looks good to me - and great to see someone is fixing it!
> >
> > One slightly strange edge case springs to mind - I think the behavior in
> > this edge case is fine, but wanted to bring it up explicitly just in case:
> >
> > In KVM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9769/#review17466
---
Ship it!
9342f56 (master)
Thanks
- Prasanna Santhanam
On March
the vmware
and docs stuff. Can you clean that up and upload a fresh patch?
Thanks
- Prasanna Santhanam
On March 6, 2013, 6:42 a.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep
So this is broken off from the thread on Support Timelines for the
4.0.x group of releases:
The issue is regarding upgrades. With the introduction of the
DatabaseCreator I notice that we don't have to do any sort of changes
to the baseline schema of 4.0. This is a great improvement but it only
is
; > refs/heads/master 88355b945 -> b683c34d3
> >
> >
> > Fix the typo in componentContext.xml.in
> >
> > HypervisorTemplateAdapter was mispelt causing server to not startup.
> >
> > Reported-by: Dave Cahill
> > Signed-off-by: Prasanna Santh
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:15:18AM -0500, Min Chen wrote:
> Thanks Prasanna. I did mvn build before merging to master locally,
> not sure what happened here. Will check my local files again when I
> am back to my computer.
Let's not just do a build. Let's also try to deploy the server. In this
cas
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:20:55PM +0530, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted a git tutorial intended for beginners who would like to contribute
> to CloudStack.
> Check it out:
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/sebastiengoasguen/git-101-for-cloudstack
>
> -sebastien
Saw this as it was de
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:53:36AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:34:41AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 28, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 03:00 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > >> I stated my opinion on this pre
ing error on starting the
> management server. Note the spelling of "Hypervisor":
>
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> com.cloud.template.HyervisorTemplateAdapter
>
> The issue is the misspelling in client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in.
>
> thanks,
>
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:37:04AM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
> It is broken. We are getting this error only in master branch.
>
> Failed to execute goal on project cloud-vmware-base: Could not
> resolve dependencies for project
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-vmware-base:jar:4.2.0-SNAPSHOT
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9651/#review17377
---
Looks good as a covering index. Kishan?
- Prasanna Santhanam
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13591293#comment-13591293
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1436:
I just checked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13591212#comment-13591212
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1436:
Didn't see
suppose this goes for any of these package fixes.
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Prasanna Santhanam (JIRA)
>
>
>> 4.1 management server fails to start from RPM build artifacts
>> -
>>
>>
Congratulations Marcus!
--
Prasanna.,
On 01-Mar-2013, at 22:57, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Marcus to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to announce
> that he has accepted.
>
> Please join me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590692#comment-13590692
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1469:
You're ri
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1469
>>Project: CloudStack
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
>> default.)
>> Components: KVM
>> Affects Ver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590651#comment-13590651
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1469:
Agree. Cent
>>Project: CloudStack
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
>> default.)
>> Components: KVM
>> Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>> Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam
>>
--
Prasanna.,
On 01-Mar-2013, at 17:33, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just want to share that the do-it-yourself systemvm appliance feature
> works for me, for Xen. There is one catch though, VirtualBox exports
> VHD appliance which is said to be compliant with HyperV. I thought we
> may n
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 02:34:08AM +0530, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:19:00PM -0800, Min Chen wrote:
> > Honestly speaking, the reason that I didn't run existing marvin test suite
> > against my local setup is that I myself is not familiar with Marvin test
> > framework and do
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:16:17PM +0530, Min Chen wrote:
> Prasanna, do you have a sample cfg file you can share to run marvin test
> against vmware environment?
>
Min, you don't need a separate config file per hypervisor. once you've
added the vsphere managed cluster to your CS running from you
This is a request to create a JIRA component for tracking packaging
related bugs. 'packaging'?
--
Prasanna.,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1469:
--
Assignee: Hugo Trippaers (was: Prasanna Santhanam)
hugo looking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1469:
--
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam (was: Rajesh Battala)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590381#comment-13590381
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1430:
Still blocke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1466:
--
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam
TODO: Review the test plan for
Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-1469:
--
Summary: kvm agent: agent service fails to start up
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1469
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1469
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam closed CLOUDSTACK-1436.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Management server starts fine but the agent is having
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam resolved CLOUDSTACK-1468.
Resolution: Duplicate
This case is covered in CLOUDSTACK-1436. See my
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:56:05PM +0530, Chip Childers wrote:
> Everyone should know this by now, but our schedule has us shifting to a
> model where we limit the commits going into the 4.1 branch to a very
> few.
>
> Now we have some serious bugs still outstanding, which is challenging to
> say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1436:
--
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam (was: Noa Resare)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590338#comment-13590338
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1436:
I fixed the b
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:38:47PM +0530, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> QA is blocked with basic compilation and build failures on both 4.1 and 4.2.
>
> CLOUDSTACK-14364.1 management server fails to start from RPM
> build artifacts (Prasanna seem to have been working on it)
> Seeing compilation e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1465:
--
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam
> List Zones returns null un
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589483#comment-13589483
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1436:
Noa,
I reve
> On Feb. 28, 2013, 12:10 p.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> > Ship It!
Wait - doesn't this break the developer environment? It will fix the binary
however.
- Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589471#comment-13589471
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1430:
Currently blo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589385#comment-13589385
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1436:
Noa, yes the se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam updated CLOUDSTACK-1436:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.2.0
> 4.1 management server fails to start f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam updated CLOUDSTACK-1436:
---
Affects Version/s: 4.2.0
> 4.1 management server fails to st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam resolved CLOUDSTACK-1423.
Resolution: Duplicate
Yes - so this is duplicated by CLOUDSTACK-1436
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1423:
--
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam (was: Pradeep Soundararajan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1423:
--
Assignee: Pradeep Soundararajan (was: Prasanna Santhanam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589320#comment-13589320
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1423:
So there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reopened CLOUDSTACK-1423:
To get more info it's best to assign the bug to the person providing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1423:
--
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam (was: Pradeep Soundararajan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1430:
--
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam
> KVM: systemVMs failed to c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam resolved CLOUDSTACK-1423.
Resolution: Incomplete
> Unable to launch UI [HTTP Status
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589265#comment-13589265
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1423:
What's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam updated CLOUDSTACK-1423:
---
Assignee: Pradeep Soundararajan (was: Prasanna Santhanam)
> Una
1 - 100 of 608 matches
Mail list logo