t; wrote:
>>
>>> Sebstien, Kelcey thanks for bringing this to closure
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> Sebastien Goasguen
>>>> Sent: Tue
apache.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Sebastien Goasguen
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:58 AM
>>> To: Kelcey Jamison-Damage; Sebastien Goasguen; cloudstack
>>> Subject: Re: Review Request: Utility for generating the .tx/config file
>>>
>>>
closure
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
>> Sebastien Goasguen
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:58 AM
>> To: Kelcey Jamison-Damage; Sebastien Goasguen; cloudstack
>> Subject: Re: Review
k
> Subject: Re: Review Request: Utility for generating the .tx/config file
>
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://revie
;> -Original Message-
>> From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca]
>> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 12:48 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Review Request: Utility for generating the .tx/config file
>>
>> I was unawar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8307/#review16463
---
This is not needed anymore since we agreed to a maximum of 50 char fo
r.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Review Request: Utility for generating the .tx/config file
>
> I was unaware of the transifex tool.
>
> I can switch to .slice, can you provide me an example .ent file?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:29 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
st: Utility for generating the .tx/config file
On Dec 3, 2012, at 10:02 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
>> The 500 files is not really an issue, I think.but the file length might
be.
>
>
> Agreed - we could just iterate 500x
On Dec 3, 2012, at 10:02 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> The 500 files is not really an issue, I think…but the file length might be.
>
>
> Agreed - we could just iterate 500x - the file length is a different story.
>
> --David
I found 5
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> The 500 files is not really an issue, I think…but the file length might be.
Agreed - we could just iterate 500x - the file length is a different story.
--David
The 500 files is not really an issue, I think…but the file length might be.
On Dec 3, 2012, at 9:53 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> docs/en-US/cloudstack.ent
>
> Sebastien - I think that 'works' - but you'd need to iterate for every
> resource (500+ of those), and it doesn't deal with filename length
docs/en-US/cloudstack.ent
Sebastien - I think that 'works' - but you'd need to iterate for every
resource (500+ of those), and it doesn't deal with filename length
problem (or didn't last time I tried it)
I was unaware of the transifex tool.
I can switch to .slice, can you provide me an example .ent file?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 3, 2012, at 12:29 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Doesn't transifex client create the tx config file automatically based on the
> op/pot files created by publican ?
Doesn't transifex client create the tx config file automatically based on the
op/pot files created by publican ?
something like this:
tx set --auto-local -r project.$resource "/$resource.po"
--source-language=en --source-file "pot/$resource.pot" --execute
http://help.transifex.com/features/clie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8307/#review13963
---
I tested this and see at least one problem.
It's looking for a '.' a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8307/
---
(Updated Dec. 2, 2012, 1:29 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8307/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Utility for generating the .
17 matches
Mail list logo
