Dear All,
is there a way to specify the link command in CMake? If I specify
export LD=/usr/bin/ld ; cmake $MY_SOURCE_DIRECTORY
it is not taken and if I set
cmake $MY_SOURCE_DIRECTORY \
-DCMAKE_C_LINK_EXECUTABLE=ld \
-DCMAKE_CXX_LINK_EXECUTABLE=ld
what I observe is that the entire link
Hi all,
I would like to build a Fortran90 project using Fortran intel compiler.
I would like to increase the stack by adding the /stack
flag to the linker.
Looking on the documentation, I think that set(CMAKE_EXE_LINKERS_FLAG
/stack:6400) will do the job but I was wondering if using this
Hello Johny,
I am afraid not… here is what I get if I specify the full path
/usr/bin/ld
this is *all* the command, which of course fails. best,
Federico Carminati
CERN-PH
1211 Geneva 23
Switzerland
Tel: +41 22 76 74959
Fax: +41 22 76 68505
Mobile: +41 76 487 4843
On 13 Sep 2011, at 09:57,
2011/9/13 Federico Carminati federico.carmin...@cern.ch:
Dear All,
is there a way to specify the link command in CMake? If I specify
export LD=/usr/bin/ld ; cmake $MY_SOURCE_DIRECTORY
it is not taken and if I set
I dont' know if LD env var is supposed to be used at all.
cmake
Hello Eric,
sorry for not having changed the subject, I realize it only now. Thanks for
your answer. I am trying to use clang / clang++. This works if I do
cmake $MY_SOURCE_DIRECTORY -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++
however CMake decides to use clang / clang++ as
On 09/12/2011 09:06 PM, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 20:30, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
How about using a custom command that runs the unit test using a
wrapper script that upon successful completion creates a stamp-file and
depends upon the unit-test executable
2011/9/13 pellegrini pellegr...@ill.fr:
Hi all,
I would like to build a Fortran90 project using Fortran intel compiler. I
would like to increase the stack by adding the /stack
flag to the linker.
Looking on the documentation, I think that set(CMAKE_EXE_LINKERS_FLAG
/stack:6400) will do
On 09/13/2011 10:35 AM, pellegrini wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to build a Fortran90 project using Fortran intel compiler.
I would like to increase the stack by adding the /stack
flag to the linker.
Looking on the documentation, I think that set(CMAKE_EXE_LINKERS_FLAG
/stack:6400)
thanks for the hint Eric Michael
Eric
Michael Wild a écrit :
On 09/13/2011 10:35 AM, pellegrini wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to build a Fortran90 project using Fortran intel compiler.
I would like to increase the stack by adding the /stack
flag to the linker.
Looking on the
Hello,
I usually develop with Visual STudio, but I have to code now on Eclipse so that
my software is runnable on Linux.
I so installed the last release of Eclipse, and want to run CMake 2.8.5 to
export an Eclipse project.
The solutions/projects that CMake generated for Visual are OK.
When I
2011/9/13 sv...@free.fr:
Hello,
I usually develop with Visual STudio, but I have to code now on Eclipse so
that my software is runnable on Linux.
I so installed the last release of Eclipse, and want to run CMake 2.8.5 to
export an Eclipse project.
The solutions/projects that CMake
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Peter Collingbourne pe...@pcc.me.ukwrote:
It looks like various custom commands aren't running (some tcl related
stuff, docbook documentation generation) - are custom commands currently
supported?
Yes, custom commands and targets are supported. There
Which menu are you using to try the import?
Here was the error : I was trying to import a C++ project.
I do not observe the same behavior (no xml file required)
.cproject and .project are xml files.
Yes, but without the XML extension. :-)
Did you try what's described here:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 08:40:32AM -0400, Clifford Yapp wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Peter Collingbourne pe...@pcc.me.ukwrote:
It looks like various custom commands aren't running (some tcl related
stuff, docbook documentation generation) - are custom commands currently
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
On 8/30/2011 4:11 AM, Andrea Galeazzi wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if the bug 0011258
http://public.kitware.com/**Bug/view.php?id=11258http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11258
will be fixed or the
community
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:12:55 AM Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi,
just saw that the main cmake_install.cmake contains (at the end):
FILE(WRITE
[${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}]/${CMAKE_INSTALL_MANIFEST}
)
FOREACH(file ${CMAKE_INSTALL_MANIFEST_FILES})
FILE(APPEND
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 06:53:23 PM cheshirekow wrote:
Hi cmake list,
I'm using cmake to manage a CUDA project, and I'm generating an eclipse
project for development.
Since CDT doesn't natively understand the output from the nvidia
compiler, I've created a new regex error parser
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 05:07:00 AM Clifford Yapp wrote:
I am trying to compare two large lists of file paths (about 14,000 lines
each) to identify which entries in each list are missing from the other,
and while I can get CMake to do it I must be doing it the wrong way
because the
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 05:07:00 AM Clifford Yapp wrote:
I am trying to compare two large lists of file paths (about 14,000 lines
each) to identify which entries in each list are missing from the other,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 05:07:00 AM Clifford Yapp wrote:
I am trying to compare two large lists of file paths (about 14,000
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:33:01PM +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:12:55 AM Andreas Mohr wrote:
Depending on actual implementation of CMake (whether it has some caching
logic or not), this might be woefully inefficient,
causing a possibly
2011/9/13 Clifford Yapp cliffy...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 05:07:00 AM Clifford Yapp wrote:
I am trying to compare
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Clifford Yapp cliffy...@gmail.com wrote:
(if CMake had sucked in openbsd's diff to implement its diff abilities, for
example)
Ah, nevermind - I see the key file still has the advertising clause BSD.
Scratch that.
___
Eric -
Excellent! That looks like it will do the trick.
Thank you!
CY
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.comwrote:
If I understand it well you want to compute symmetric difference.
Assuming BUILD_FILES and SVN_FILES initially contains the whole list of
hello everyone!
this is my first post on the mailing list
i am making a shared library
i have everything configured properly so that cmake creates de makefile
scripts as espected
at the moment cmake is installing my library by default into:
/usr/local/lib/mylib.so.0.1 (and the symlink mylib.so)
2011/9/13 Cristobal Navarro axisch...@gmail.com:
hello everyone!
this is my first post on the mailing list
i am making a shared library
i have everything configured properly so that cmake creates de makefile
scripts as espected
at the moment cmake is installing my library by default into:
2011/9/13 Clifford Yapp cliffy...@gmail.com:
Eric -
Excellent! That looks like it will do the trick.
Thank you!
Please tell us about the performance but from the implementation of REMOVE_ITEM
I bet the performance shouldn't be that good:
inside cmListCommand.cxx:
bool cmListCommand
On 09/13/2011 11:05 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 09/12/2011 09:06 PM, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 20:30, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
How about using a custom command that runs the unit test using a
wrapper script that upon successful completion creates a stamp-file
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via a0ec7a00d5fe1a8b65329545f24080af581705be (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via 0b29621e6c15ea04b67ea541fb02403b315a770a (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via 98d5623a7b809a8d730fd197412935b52f234e7d (commit)
via
31 matches
Mail list logo
