Hi All,
I have succesfully converted my source to use the latest find script.
I have to say, GOD JOB! I wasn't expecting this level of flexibilityof
the script. I didn't have to add anything whiel configuring. Simply
configure and go!
Thanks again for this effort. I will still keep thinking
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Jorgen Bodde wrote:
I have succesfully converted my source to use the latest find script.
I have to say, GOD JOB! I wasn't expecting this level of flexibilityof
the script. I didn't have to add anything whiel configuring. Simply
configure and go!
I'm glad
Hi All,
After a (long) while I wanted to attend to my wxWidgets projects again
which I generate from a CMake project. I generated, and found out the
libs that were expected were still of the 2.6 version of wxWidgets,
while they are at 2.8 already (soon 2.9 even).
When it comes to using wxWidgets
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Jorgen Bodde wrote:
After a (long) while I wanted to attend to my wxWidgets projects again
which I generate from a CMake project. I generated, and found out the
libs that were expected were still of the 2.6 version of wxWidgets,
while they are at 2.8
Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
I believe that the best approach is something that we can convince the
wxWidgets developers to integrate with there distribution. In the line
of wx-config. Better yet would be to create a set of CMakeLists.txt
files for the wxWidgets system. If you build
Hi Miquel,
I am not here to critisize your work, on the contrary, your work is
probably based on Jerry fath's work, which is based upon my work ;-) I
did contribute to CMake too once a long while ago ;-)
Current CVS/HEAD FindwxWidgets and I think the last release CMake
2.4.8 supports upto
Jorgen Bodde wrote:
Who knows the wx guys will evantually switch to Cmake after all. They
arlready made a huge switch to Doxygen after sticking to LaTEX
documentation for ages. If you look at an example bakefile for any
potential project here:
http://www.wxwidgets.org/wiki/index.php/Bakefile
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Jorgen Bodde wrote:
Hi Miquel,
I am not here to critisize your work, on the contrary, your work is
probably based on Jerry fath's work, which is based upon my work ;-) I
did contribute to CMake too once a long while ago ;-)
Don't worry, no offense taken. I
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
Jorgen Bodde wrote:
Who knows the wx guys will evantually switch to Cmake after all. They
arlready made a huge switch to Doxygen after sticking to LaTEX
documentation for ages. If you look at an example bakefile for any
potential
Hi Miquel / Bill / et al
You mean generated at configuration/build time from the bakefile
system? That seems like a good idea. They would have to generate
different files probably, since different configurations co-exist.
wxWidgets-unicode-release.cmake
wxWidgets-unicode-static.cmake
Hi Jorgen,
I wanted to do exactly that. Create a small executable that could
function as a wx-config.exe for wxWidgets on Windows where CMAKE could
benefit from the variables being set, and then kind of making the find
process more integrated with the wxWidgets distribution. I would
create it
Hi Werner,
sorry I missed your original post. It is worth looking at to see if we
can produce some kind of CMake friendly script. I'm however not sure
what the best way is to solve this the most user friendly way to only
let the user determine which config he would like for his generated
project.
12 matches
Mail list logo
