Hi!
I’m currently struggling with trying to build GNOME projects using meson, but
depending on CMake-built libraries, either in the wild or inside a package
manager. I have managed to uncover that the way Meson is trying to invoke CMake
https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg/issues/6683#issuecommen
summer project, but it
seems that’s the first step.
Cheers,
Máté
Feladó: Kyle Edwards
Elküldve: 2019. július 8., hétfő 15:56
Címzett: Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc; CMake fejlesztők
Tárgy: Re: [cmake-developers] cmake-file-api and CTest
On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 09:04 +, Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc via cmake
Tárgy: Re: [cmake-developers] cmake-file-api and CTest
On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 09:04 +, Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc via cmake-
developers wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am trying to cook a CTest back-end to the Test Explorer UI
> extension for VS Code as a summer project and I thought of using the
Hi!
I am trying to cook a CTest back-end to the Test Explorer UI extension for VS
Code as a summer project and I thought of using the new cmake-file-api for it.
The docs however are understandably scarce and I could not muster how to obtain
tests and not targets. Is it possible with this ini
Hi!
I am trying to improve the developer experience of SYCL users for both those
using triSYCL and ComputeCpp alike. (TL;DR: SYCL is CUDA of OpenCL, triSYCL
being a non-conforming playground implementation built atop OpenMP, while
ComputeCpp is the first (and only) conforming GPU-accelerated im
ier
http://www.jcelerier.name
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc via cmake-developers
wrote:
Impressed with VSCode?? If I saw this post anywhere else than the CMake mailing
list, I’d understand, but VSCode with CMake is horrible. The fact that in 2017
I have to set include dir
Impressed with VSCode?? If I saw this post anywhere else than the CMake mailing
list, I’d understand, but VSCode with CMake is horrible. The fact that in 2017
I have to set include directories, compiler definitions and target paths
manually to have proper IntelliSense (Code navigation and syntax
I just wanted to note that big thumbs up for both the effort and the design.
Eagerly awaiting the time I can use it in my projects. As soon as it lands,
I’ll imbue the triSYCL CMake scripts to make use of it.
Sidenote/question: Is it possible for multiple targets to share the same PCH?
This usa
I think it’s a good idea.
Having PackageConfig.cmake files for all projects would be better, but
unfortunately, many projects don’t support CMake to that extent (or to any
extent to be precise). I still consume SFML like this, even though the project
itself builds with CMake, so they could’ve r
Hi Egor!
This thread very much resembles my suggestion from two years ago, when I
proposed there should be an intermediate representation of the CMake scripts so
generators can be implemented against a stable IR as opposed to bare C++
constructs. (Google „CMake IR”)
My main motive too was to g
Dear CMake devs/users,
I wanted to ask your opinion on something that has been troubling me since…
well, ever since I started using CMake. I have not found a single person alive
who would have said:
“The script language of CMake is nice, intuitive and productive. Authoring
scripts is easy, a
11 matches
Mail list logo