Hello all, this is my first post, so forgive me if i get it wrong... ;/
Nuno, you wrote :
Or if you are (as you intend to pass that idea) you
are just pitching a Nirvana that in the end your followers (customers)
will pay for it in ways they are not expecting (lots of )(Give me
the money
You don't publish data the same way on a telephone, web site, intranet,
paper etc. So that means you need to structure your data (at the source)
for
all possible existing and future publishing supports - and that is where
things get complicated...
So highly structuring your data 'at the source'
Hi Guys
Having separate site structures in different languages can turn into a
consistency nightmare, and after having done a few multi-lingual custom
projects with our software, I agree that forcing the site structure on
each language helps maintain consistency or structure, and also helps
Hi all,
I took the liberty of changing the title because we are not only talking
about writers anymore. We are talking about automating a process of
publishing the same content in any device the publisher (owner of the
content) he wants.
Some people in this round table believe that by
Hi,
I'm new to this list and hoping someone with more experience than I can
answer this (I've tried the MS newsgroups but can't get a straight answer).
I have Content Management Server 2002 installed on a remote server and am
trying to develop from my PC. It seems that to be able to develop a
Alex,
I'm not sure if it is possible to not install them,
but the setup we've found works best in terms of
developer isolation, common codebase is to have
everything installed locally for each developer except
for the database which we share.
We then store all code in sourcesafe and use a naming
I think Michael Kimsal has some good questions and points that he brought
up. I'd like to see them addressed too.
Also, Michael, I went to your website today. I'm creating a product similar
to yours (in ASP) and was wondering if you might share any opinions you may
have on:
--your pricing? how
The most common term I have seen is Developer Source. This indicates
that you are provided a copy of the source code upon purchase of the
product but you are not allowed to redistribute it with or without
modifications.
Sincerely,
Anthony Eden
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi,
In light of the recent, frequently heated recent discussions I've seen on
the list, I wanted to at least present another side of the open source vs.
commercial debate. Much of this may not be applicable to your own
situations, but it may be of interest nonetheless.
I work for a nonprofit
