You can even add the term Collaborative Source (cf. from our License FAQ:
http://www.jahia.org/jahia/Jahia/pid/336 )
What are the differences between the terms open source, collaborative
source and developer source?
All these categories of licenses allow any authorized end-users to access
to
"Developer Source" I like that.
Lux
On Thursday, November 7, 2002, at 02:27 PM, Anthony Eden wrote:
The most common term I have seen is "Developer Source". This indicates
that you are provided a copy of the source code upon purchase of the
product but you are not allowed to redistribute it w
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:cms-list-admin@;cms-list.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kimsal
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Open Source vs. FREE - WAS RE: [cms-list] Are
> there any .Asp or C# Open Source Content Mangement System
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 08:18 AM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
You show Pillar Software how to make money by giving away BBuilder and
we will consider it.
[/snip]
Tony,
I never said anything concerning Pillar, nor would I suggest that you
give
it away. What I was saying is that FRE
I know I cc'ed you incorrectly opps! Sorry!
But I really do believe in Open Source...but I just can't figure out how
to make it work.
--
http://cms-list.org/
trim your replies for good karma.
FREE - WAS RE: [cms-list] Are there any
.Asp or C# Open Source Content Mangement Systems out there?..
I know I cc'ed you incorrectly opps! Sorry!
But I really do believe in Open Source...but I just can't figure out how
to make it work.
--
http://cms-list.org/
trim your replies for good karma.
Hi Tony,
> "Tony" == Tony Leotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> Pillar Software has to pay Microsoft tens of thousands of
Tony> dollars in the form of software licenses. Because we
Tony> actually pay Microsoft to use their software...rather than
Tony> steal it, which is im
[snip]
You show Pillar Software how to make money by giving away BBuilder and
we will consider it.
[/snip]
Tony,
I never said anything concerning Pillar, nor would I suggest that you give
it away. What I was saying is that FREE is different than OPEN SOURCE. You
can still 'sell' (license) your so
Pillar Software has to pay Microsoft tens of thousands of dollars in the
form of software licenses. Because we actually pay Microsoft to use
their software...rather than steal it, which is immoral, illegal and
just plain wrong.
We have to pay our programmers much much more.
I have asked my progr
[snip]
http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php
The people behind the term 'open source' would disagree. Whether or not you
consider it 'official' the thrust of 'open source' as a descriptive term is
firmly behind things being 'free' as well as allowing 'access to source
code'.
[/snip]
And I, f
10 matches
Mail list logo
