Yes he did. In 2016. 29.6.2016 to be precise :)
Ciao.Mike
Am 22.12.2022 um 20:44 schrieb Dave Jones:
Hello, all.
Didn't John at one time publish, or at least reference, a paper on how
to set up the GCC compiler to product S390x code while running on Intel
Linux?
Happy Holidays, too.
DJ
Am 17.08.2020 um 22:46 schrieb David Boyes:
> There has to be a better way; alternative ideas or suggestions welcomed
Sure: CSV. For the "quick no-frills datastores for small numbers
of entries" you mention, simple is better. It is only worth to
care for NAMES files if it is to maintain the
Am 09.06.2020 um 21:03 schrieb Rob van der Heij:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 18:37, wrote:
>
>> The CRC stage could use "canned" CRC algorithms or some custom
>> defined ones. Is there a trick or any chance at all to define an
>> algorithm for 10-bit words instead of 16- or 32-bit?
>>
>>
The CRC stage could use "canned" CRC algorithms or some custom
defined ones. Is there a trick or any chance at all to define an
algorithm for 10-bit words instead of 16- or 32-bit?
Ciao.Mike
--
www.Ok.de - die kostenlose E-Mail Adresse
Am 15.05.2020 um 18:59 schrieb Glenn Knickerbocker:
> On 5/9/2020 5:48 PM, amphitr...@ok.de wrote:
>> If the easily filtered headers are as good as section delimiters,
>> you have won.
>
> That's where I lose in this case. Even the actual section headers
> identifying the different source files
Am 10.05.2020 um 00:17 schrieb Paul Gilmartin:
> Ouch! Is there any way you can use a smarter comparator such as
> SUPERC or diff (should be in OpenExtensions)?
LOL! No, SUPERC is super, no doubt. But why not reinvent the wheel
once more? SUPERC it is not a pipe stage (AFAIK) and the task was
Hello!
Am 08.05.2020 um 20:46 schrieb Glenn Knickerbocker:
> (I don't control
> the process of building the big file, so I can't just add section
> delimiters, but I can easily filter out commonly occurring lines like
> blanks and headers.)
If the easily filtered headers are as good as section
Am 18.08.2019 um 21:44 schrieb Rob van der Heij:
> Did I compete with the join | split approach? Can I also participate with
> this?
You cap yourself: now 60 ms only.
To avoid the Not I bracketed Deal:
... literal | d: deal | drop ...
alas there is no further gain by that.
Ciao.Mike
RITA showed, Glenn's solution is honourable second, while Rob's
suggestion only penultimate far behind ;)
The details: I tested only with one log file of 161'000 lines.
RITA revealed that most of the time is lost (or spent ?) in
rearranging the records for later advantageous use. Instead of
Am 17.08.2019 um 02:23 schrieb Glenn Knickerbocker:
> [...]
> A way that's a little tricky but avoids messing with combining records
> is to use DROP LAST to delay a copy of the file by one record, [...]
>
> (end /) ...
> | dup: fanout
> | strfind '_'
> | all: faninany
> | ...
>
Thank you both for all suggestions.
I now use Rob's first one, just to keep it as a reminder that
Between's "target" argument may also be a number of records.
Am 14.08.2019 um 18:49 schrieb Rob van der Heij:
> | x: if between /tag/ 2
> | spec 1-* c2x
> | join / /
> | spec w2 1 w1 nw
> |
In a file I have every now and then a record tagged at the
beginning, all other lines begin with blanks. I'd like to change
the sequence of tagged records with the one directly following it
(which is for sure not tagged).
I tried with Fanintwo, but failed. I considered a mod of Throttle
REXX
Am 22.03.2019 um 21:45 schrieb René Jansen:
> I do think that we strayed too far off-topic on a list that is called
> CMS-PIPELINES.
Sorry for asking on this list about PC-Pipes, but I looked for
several days elsewhere, alas luckless. Frustrated by the result of
those "I-know-all" searching
Dear Sir,
quick, short and sufficiently precise as always.
i) how could I ask,
ii) drowned/perished? What The Machine(s) don't fish out does
virtually not exist any more.
Best Regards,
...
Am 22.03.2019 um 11:59 schrieb John P. Hartmann:
> i) No.
> ii) Waters: The Machine.
>
> On 3/22/19
The only hint I found about PC-Pipe's existence is a 10 years old
append announcing an update of PC-Pipes, alas today the link is dead.
Questions:
i) is there a result from the efforts to migrate Pipelines to the
PC world, comparable to the original?
ii) where may I find it?
Ciao.Mike
--
Am 09.11.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Rob van der Heij:
> If you were to write your application with your bare hands, the FULLSCR
> stage does nicely terminate when the output stream is severed. Just saying.
>
> Sir Rob the Plumber
Dear Sir,
if you are 'just saying' you could just have a look here in
Am 09.11.2018 um 15:45 schrieb Alan Altmark:
> When you say "trigger VSCREEN WAITREAD", do you mean that you would like a
> VSCREEN WAITREAD command to end because of an external event? If so, the
> answer is "No".
Too bad. Help about VSCREEN WAITREAD mentions about the possible
content of
For an application using Fullscreen CMS I'd like to have a
timeout. Fortunately there is a BEAT stage, so I tried
"PIPE (end ? sep !) nuwfk ! a:beat 5 ?a:'
with NUWFK REXX containing mainly
address '' "VSC WAITREAD NUT"
"CALLPIPE stem waitread. ! stem waitread. MAIN"
When it
Is there somewhere a REXX that does the complete reversal of the
POLISH stage?
For what purpose? Well, once upon a time there was an HP-71B doing
BASIC and I'd like to decompile the files I found on an old disk.
(Its about hobby and as such of minor importance.)
I am already there to put
In Pipe Ahelp Snake I find:
> Premature Termination: "snake" terminates when it discovers
> that its output stream is not connected.
I found this statement _after_ a little test directly from the
XEDIT command line
> pipe(sep !)literal + - :!dup *!split!snake 7 2!take 5!term
what made me
Am 31.10.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Hobart Spitz:
> [...]
> (Why use CC on a non-printer? To get underscores and some color. Try it.)
For two days I thought the attributes '(* * * * * * 0' would
do the trick and make 'browse' use the same codepage as term/cons
or xedit. Now with option CC -
Problem solved, by reading documentation and little testing.
But first I took the far distance deviation over extracting
FPLRICBW REXX (15 Dec 2007 12:36:31) from PIPELINE MODULE. So I
found BROWSE/BRW does not mind what is set as NONDISP character
(00-3f and ff are set to blank), and only 8 of 9
To the Senior Managing 3270 Codepage Dark Arts Instructor
Dear Sir,
most respected Esquire,
thank you to shed some light on this darkest site of my knowledge,
I will do bestir myself and bring Browse to work flawlessly also
on PersComm as it did so far on Mochasoft's tn3270.
Best,
Mike
Thank you for your prompt reply.
> Your application can parse the output of DIAGNOSE 0x8C (REXX diag('8C')
> BIF) to discover the code page of the terminal and use that value on
> TERMCODEPAGE.
I will dig a bit deeper in this direction. Gets thrilling. :)
>> ... And if I set CMS fullscreen on,
Hello Hobart!
> I use BROWSE often. At the risk of throwing a monkey wrench into the
> works, I'll add a few comments.
Thank you for writing down what I thought.
Well, your first point may be a bit special, I regard browse first
as data-presenter for interactive applications. But if it helps
Hello Alan
> The cons/term stage is 3215 line mode. [...]
> CP does not assume a particular code page.
As such I regard this as accurate, if the 3270 emulation on my PC
is set up correctly.
> Browse, on the other hand, is full screen. Be careful what kind of data <
> 0x40 you send to
As Pipelines touches almost everything VM/CMS I assume following
question is appropriate within this list, albeit it is somewhat
related to 3270 emulations too.
Until this weekend I assumed the display from
> pipe(sep !)xrange 40-ff!fblock 16!term
and
> pipe(sep !)xrange 40-ff!fblock 16!brw
Am 18.08.2016 um 19:38 schrieb Rob Van der Heij:
> Mike, did you consider to use lookup to replace the cascade? That should make
> it easy to terminate. Doesn't pipedemo change propagation of eof? I'd use
> listrc to check.
> Rob
Thank you and all who replied. I will give LOOKUP a try, even
> A dirtier trick that comes to mind
I am glad I dared to ask. Compared to my original idea I now have
i) a much simpler way to achieve almost the same, and
ii) a surprisingly tricky solution, at least for me.
Both are really sophisticated in their way. Well, the 'prefix
recno' could even be more
OK, I will do as you adviced. Drawback: such a REXX fails when
called from CMS command line.
(The free WiFi Cafe is closing at 1800, so TNX and nice WE!)
Ciao.Mike
Am 14.05.2016 um 17:47 schrieb Kris Buelens:
> The problem is that the added PIPE runs independently of the REXX stage
> that
Really?? The number indicates how many caller environments to go
*back*. I'd like to set the var in the REXX that issues the ADDPIPE.
Am 14.05.2016 um 17:32 schrieb Jack Woehr:
> amphitr...@ok.de wrote:
>> var where tracking'
> var 1 where tracking
--
www.Ok.de - die kostenlose E-Mail Adresse
Building a parser for nibble-oriented files I tried to get an
indicator 'where I am'. So I coded in my REXX
> "ADDPIPE (sep ! end ?) *.input:",
> '! spec *-* c2x 1',
> '! fblock 2',
> '! reverse',
> '! fblock 1',
> '!a:sync',
> '!*.input:',
> '? literal',
> '! dup *',
> '!a:',
> '! spec
To de-block text files from HP LIF disks none of the many options
of DEBLOCK was suitable. Structured fields is quite close, but the
length of the length field is not included in the length. In
addition records of odd length are padded with one byte so next
length field starts on an even byte.
Dear Sir,
most respected Esquire,
> In short, you can do whatever you like.
I do my very best and get hit by error messages.
> [...] but if you refer to a stream that isn't there, retribution
> will be swift.
You state it so crystal clear I fear there is no mercy and my
petition for indulgence
In my opinion there is no need neither for an option nor a
configuration variable. Who has the hours to fine-adjust
processing with options may use a STRLIT IFEMPTY to achieve the
same. Fiddling with my OCT2>HEX rexx I found VERIFY does pass null
records too. So I use LOCATE to filter them out.
I flipped through The Book but did not find an example. When I
want an optional secondary stream in a REXX, do I have to query
for it and optional use '*..1:' or 'take 0' in my callpipe? Or is
there a canonical way to make the secondary connector act smart?
And, what do I have to do that
What do you expect as result from following pipelines?
> pipe(sep !)literal! split!count lines!term
> pipe(sep !)literal ! split!count lines!term
> pipe(sep !)literal !split!count lines!term
I was quite surprised at the difference so I have to tell about
here. Found it while "wildly" testing a
To put some colour to a 3270 I use Fullscreen CMS. In a Pipe I
assemble the CMS commands to colourize what the same Pipe just
displayed on the terminal. Following is a snippet which 'overlays'
the highlighting for changes in a side-by-side listing. (The
second column starts at position 24.)
>
Am 22.08.2015 um 12:19 schrieb Melinda Varian:
The end of that discussion in July of 1999 was this REXX stage by Michael
Faulhaber:
[...]
Two remarks: i - it was not my intention to end that discussion in
1999, and ii - even the CSVCLN REXX shows '.Mike' as author it
is not at all my
Am 01.01.2015 um 19:53 schrieb John P. Hartmann:
[..] I cannot check that all is as it should be.
Holler
if no and I shall fix it.
It seems to me there is an interference with Fullscreen CMS.
With Fullscreen ON following line in a exec drops variable t and
displays the answer from the CMS
Hello all.
Question: REVERSE has no arguments?
Recently I had to reverse a record 2-byte-wise and helped me with
SPECS:
fblock 5
reverse
vchar 10 16
spec 7.2 1 5.2 3 3.2 5 1.2 7
fblock 2
With the necessary FBLOCK 2 in the end I now coded:
'! fblock 2560! reverse! vchar 10 16', /* get
Hello all!
How may I stop an record-doubling branch when I got enough records
from it? With GATE of cause, alas... let me explain.
There exists a protocol for sending data via TCPIP from one device
to the next and back to the sender which compares it with the sent
data to see if the loop is
42 matches
Mail list logo
