I’m guessing most of the reviews are for boats with big changes in performance.
PHRF Chesapeake has done some, but not often. Looking around the country, the
30-1, from hull number 1 (on the Chesapeake) to hull numbers over 600 seem to
have the same 174 handicap (mine is number 593 and is 174 al
I, like many of us, am sometimes off the boat for days/weeks. I'd like to
track the bilge cycles to indicate a problem.
There are several options.
1. Buy a nice purpose built bilge cycle counter like the one from Water
Witch for $80 or so
2. Replace my existing bilge switch with the Wat
I have these
Omron H7EC-N Total Counter
Got one on flea bay for 5 bucks as a replacement, so they are not all that
pricy. They have a tiny battery in them that seems to last years, and I find it
very helpful, as I would never have know that I had 18 cycles on one trip
(Motoring) across th
Installed a counter, liked its security, but then bought a new water sensing
bilge pump…Doh!
Counting the water sensing cycles now and is essentially useless.
Rule tells me there is no way to wire the counter to this technology.
New bilge pump I guess.
David F. Risch
(401) 419-4650
From: Cn
You know man. Tell us all please And does it matter: wet or dry on these
older sailboats. A wet bilge is a wet bilge. Hard to avoid on most 1970’s
designs so probably possible on most older C&C designs. Actually a wet
bilge is not that hard to live with on my boat the way i enjoy sailing.
On Fri,
I am surprised that all the 30’s are rated the same given the dramatic
differences in conditions they race in. San Francisco verses San Diego for
example.
Fred Hazzard
S/V Fury
C&C 44
Portland Or
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 7:08 AM Gary Nylander via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
> I’m gue
A friend of mine was chairman of the Western Long Island Sound PHRF
committee, and he told me that across the country the PHRF committees
give certain boats the same base rating, kind of yardstick boats, so to
speak, so all the committees will be working to the same reference. The
C&C 35 Mk 1
Interesting discussion as I just decided to join the cruising class at our
local club, which is for boats without an official PHRF rating; the club
handicapper provides a rating for instead, and it is reviewed after each
series of races based on results. Our 35-2 was given a rating of 175 based
on
Actually, I would like to know as well, and would install a cheap version, but
I've not found on, but have not looked very hard. Why? Because I want to know
how much my boat leaks and if a trend is happening I don't know about. Am I
getting a lot of water in the bilge when it rains? When the
Good boats sailed well do good simple right
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 8:34 PM Fred Hazzard via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
> I am surprised that all the 30’s are rated the same given the dramatic
> differences in conditions they race in. San Francisco verses San Diego for
> example.
>
Have to agree with Dwightgotta PHRF the boat.how in the world
could you rate the 'dramatic differences in conditions'.much, if not
most of the racing I have done has been in dramatic differences of
conditions.
Rob Abbott
AZURA
C&C 32 - #277
Halifax, N.S.
On 12/13/2019 10:19 PM, d
11 matches
Mail list logo