> My opposition to sessions was at the xmlrpc layer. I'm fine with
> sessions on the web side, and I believe we already do that to track
> searches and do paging.
>
> What I did not want to do is to keep track of sessions at the xmlrpc
> layer. We have the xedit api that allows a user of the xmlrpc
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:12:09 -0500, James Cammarata wrote:
> >
> > A possible solution is to use jQuery to save the original data of the input
> > elements. And during a submitting only include the input elements that are
> > changed. If detecting changes is implemented with a class then pending
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Vreman, Peter wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:20:15 -0400, Stephen Potter
>> wrote:
>> > On 3/24/2011 9:52 AM, Scott Henson wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:52:14 +, Jonathan
>> Underwood wrote:
>> > >> Is this different behaviour expected/by design, or
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:20:15 -0400, Stephen Potter
> wrote:
> > On 3/24/2011 9:52 AM, Scott Henson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:52:14 +, Jonathan
> Underwood wrote:
> > >> Is this different behaviour expected/by design, or have the cli
> and
> > >> web interfaces diverged somewhat?
>
