Le 23/05/08 à 15:26, "Ilan Volow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>IMHO Objective-C 2.0 looks like Apple's attempt to make Objective-C
>competitive with existing scripting languages, given the addition of
>the dot syntax for accessors and garbage collection changes.
No scripting languages, maybe
Le 21/05/08 à 19:03, "Clark Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Gérard Iglesias
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>with an empty NSArray (not very useful, since you can't add items to
>>>an NSArray). Then, you leak
>with an empty NSArray (not very useful, since you can't add items to
>an NSArray). Then, you leak that allocated memory by setting cityArray
>to an autoreleased NSArray
In fact it is not leaking, it is just creating an object for nothing, it will
be released by the autorelease pool, than no
Well
Something like this is standard :
- (id)init
{
if (!(self = [super init]))
return nil;
cityArray = [[NSArray alloc] initWithObjects:
@"New York"
...,
nil];
return self;
}
would wor
>denial of anything. Lowering the barriers to entry doesn't necessarily
>serve them or their consumers better, it serves new developers who see
>the iPhone as an opportunity but, obviously, there is no shortage of
>people wanting to take advantage of that opportunity, so I'm not sure
Good
>I admit, there are lots of people who don't mind dangerous
>programming environments. Some people even thrive on them. But me?
>I've had enough of the danger. I've lived my life on the edge long
>enough, and I'm ready for a nice, quiet language when it's available.
Stay with the M$ way
Hi,
Sincerely, I am coding under windows with Win32/Qt/Corba/Lua and others for a
living, I use MSDN every day, I read their example very often.
Well Qt has a very usable API and a good documentation and good examples and we
have access to the sources...
But on the Win32/Microsoft front, I don
