On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Jon C. Munson II wrote:
> If I have two entities, A and B, where A <-->>B, and the delete rule in
> entity A's relationship to B is cascade, and B's delete rule for the
> relationship to A is nullify, what happens to the actual "row" that holds
> the relationship d
If I have two entities, A and B, where A <-->>B, and the delete rule
in
entity A's relationship to B is cascade, and B's delete rule for the
relationship to A is nullify, what happens to the actual "row" that
holds
the relationship data in A that was once B after B is deleted? Does
it get
c
> Cc: Cocoa Developers
> Subject: re: Question regarding nullified relationship objects
>
> > If I have two entities, A and B, where A <-->>B, and the delete rule
> > in
> > entity A's relationship to B is cascade, and B's delete rule for the
> &
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jon C. Munson II wrote:
> To I.Savant: Actually, I am curious to know from the perspective of either
> the XML type or SQLite type. However, Ben's response provided the needed
> answer, which is that there isn't anything left hanging around with which to
> bother
> -Original Message-
> From: I. Savant [mailto:idiotsavant2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:58 PM
> To: jmun...@his.com
> Cc: Ben Trumbull; Cocoa Developers
> Subject: Re: Question regarding nullified relationship objects
>
> On Mon, Feb 9
On 09 Feb 09, at 13:06, Jon C. Munson II wrote:
[Jon C. Munson II] My intent with the question was to seek clarity
rather
than make an assumption. The dox don't say what happens, so one is
left to
make assumptions. Given that making assumptions about whether
maintenance
is needed or not is
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Jon C. Munson II wrote:
> Additionally, because Core Data works in a way that I'm not quite used to,
> clarification of the process was/is a good thing.
Absolutely. :-)
--
I.S.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@l
