> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be migrated
> before the end of summer…
On Monday Wayne Graham (CLIR/DLF) and I are hoping to migrate the Code4Lib
mailing list to a different domain. We don’t think any archives, subscriptions,
nor preferences will ge
On Jun 7, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>>> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be
>>> migrated before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible
>>> options for the lists continued existence...
>>
On May 12, 2016, at 8:30 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be
>> migrated before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible
>> options for the lists continued existence...
>
> Our list — Code
On Mar 24, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be migrated
> before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible options for the
> lists continued existence...
Our list — Code4Lib — will be migrati
I, too, have no preference in branding. Regarding DLF's offer to host the
list, I think that's a good idea too (thank you, Bethany!)
thanks,
ranti.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:02 PM, William Denton wrote:
> On 27 March 2016, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>
> Everybody, please share with the rest of
On 27 March 2016, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
Everybody, please share with the rest of us your opinion about our mailing
list’s domain. This need to move from the University of Notre Dame is a
possible opportunity to have our list come from the cod4lib.org domain. For
example, the address of the
+1
On Mar 27, 2016 23:51, "Stuart A. Yeates" wrote:
> On Monday, 28 March 2016, Mark Sandford wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Everybody, please share with the rest of us your opinion about our
> > mailing
> > > list’s domain. This need to move from the University of Notre Dame is a
> > > possib
On Monday, 28 March 2016, Mark Sandford wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Everybody, please share with the rest of us your opinion about our
> mailing
> > list’s domain. This need to move from the University of Notre Dame is a
> > possible opportunity to have our list come from the cod4lib.org domain.
> > F
>
>
>
> Everybody, please share with the rest of us your opinion about our mailing
> list’s domain. This need to move from the University of Notre Dame is a
> possible opportunity to have our list come from the cod4lib.org domain.
> For example, the address of the list might become
> code4...@lists
On Mar 25, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Bethany Nowviskie wrote:
> Dear all — I’ve been getting this as a digest, so apologies that I’m only
> seeing the thread on the future of the mailing list now!
>
> CLIR/DLF is running the same version of ye olde LISTSERV as Notre Dame, to
> support DLF-ANNOUNCE, so
First off, thank you Eric for all of the work over the years supporting
this listserv.
I really like Bethany's proposal for CLIR/DLF to host and migrate. Support
from the highest level of DLF combined with organization experience running
the software sounds like the most sustainable plan I have he
Thank you, Bethany! I am in full support of this. DLF++
-Shaun
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Bethany Nowviskie wrote:
>
> Dear all — I’ve been getting this as a digest, so apologies that I’m only
> seeing the thread on the future of the mailing list now!
>
> CLIR/DLF is running the same vers
Dear all — I’ve been getting this as a digest, so apologies that I’m only
seeing the thread on the future of the mailing list now!
CLIR/DLF is running the same version of ye olde LISTSERV as Notre Dame, to
support DLF-ANNOUNCE, some of our working group lists, and (now) all of the
discussion li
our long term efforts and work on starting and
>continuing the mailing list.
>
>On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>
>> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be
>> migrated before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a numbe
Cary Gordon writes
> You can get enough server for this from AWS for $5-10/mo.
The problem is not the ram or the disk space. It's in the policy
issues around email. Many organizations have outsourced their
email to gmail these days. I doubt "enough server" was the deciding
factor.
--
Sounds like a reasonable plan, so we might as well give it a shot. Thanks
for all your hard work on this.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Cary Gordon wrote:
> You can get enough server for this from AWS for $5-10/mo.
>
> Cary
>
> > On Mar 24, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Thomas Krichel wrote:
> >
> > P
Regarding the mailing list, here is what I propose to do:
1. Upgrade my virtual server to include more RAM and disk space.
2. Install and configure Mailman.
3. Ask people to subscribe to a bogus list so I/we can practice.
4. Evaluate.
5. If evaluation is successful, then migrate subscrib
You can get enough server for this from AWS for $5-10/mo.
Cary
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Thomas Krichel wrote:
>
> Paul Hoffman writes
>
>> If you're interested, Eric, I have some experience with Mailman (though
>> not with Listserv) and would be happy if I can -- I have some scripts to
Paul Hoffman writes
> If you're interested, Eric, I have some experience with Mailman (though
> not with Listserv) and would be happy if I can -- I have some scripts to
> do bulk operations (add or remove subscribers, etc.) and could also help
> to migrate the list archive.
I find that thi
While I have little to add to what others have already said, I do want to
add my thanks for your long term efforts and work on starting and
continuing the mailing list.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need
gan wrote:
>
> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be migrated
> before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible options for the
> lists continued existence.
>
> I have been managing the Code4Lib mailing list since its inception abou
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:39:03AM -0400, Ranti Junus wrote:
> Mailman is easy to administer, but it has a huge caveat: when a user
> request a password (reminder, etc.), it sends it as an email in plain text.
Fortunately, list administrators can disable the monthly password
reminder. Site adminin
I have been on mailman lists, like Fedora Linux, for ages and any
command that a user or other can do with the "password" that is sent
through mail is also verified by an email. So, someone could try to make
your list user recieve a digest or quit the list, etc. but it wouldn't
happen if you d
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Ranti Junus wrote:
> Thank you, Eric, for the heads up and your guardianships...
>
> Mailman is easy to administer, but it has a huge caveat: when a user
> request a password (reminder, etc.), it sends it as an email in plain text.
Yikes!
However, this is no l
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> No mention of e-mail at all. If I were an Innovative user I would say
> "No thanks!".
The Demo shows that it's possible to subscribe to instantaneous email
messages for new posts:
http://easydiscuss.stackideas.com/
HTH,
David
--
David J
those roles. Thank you for
your service :cD
If folks can guarantee long term stable hosting and support for Mailman, I
would be more than happy to vote for that choice.
Cheers,
Becky
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will m
Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul
Hoffman
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:37 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib mailing list
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:17:52PM +, Harper, Cynthia wrote:
> It was just announced at the Innovative Users
Kayiwa wrote:
> On 3/24/16 5:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>
>> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be
>> migrated before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible
>> options for the lists continued existence.
>>
>> I hav
On 3/24/16 5:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be migrated
before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible options for the
lists continued existence.
I have been managing the Code4Lib mailing list since its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Likewise, I can recommend Mailman. I was the admin of a Mailman server
supporting a few dozen lists while at Minitex and found it to be really
robust. It has somewhat fewer subscriber options than Listserv if I recall,
but the web UI is orders
Thank you for the heads-up, the previous work, and the offer of future work.
I second mailman - it seems to have a good community and continues active
development.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to
;
> -Shaun
>
> > On Mar 24, 2016, at 5:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> >
> > Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be
> migrated before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible
> options for the lists continued existence.
: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:06 AM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib mailing list
>
> Yeah, I like option two as well. I could live with option one if need be, but
> like Matt and Eric I'm not that keen on Google data mining the list.
>
&g
Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be migrated
> before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible options for the
> lists continued existence.
>
> I have been managing the Code4Lib mailing list since its inception about
> twelve years ago. T
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:29:20AM +0100, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be
> migrated before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible
> options for the lists continued existence.
>
> I have been managi
: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:06 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] code4lib mailing list
Yeah, I like option two as well. I could live with option one if need be, but
like Matt and Eric I'm not that keen on Google data mining the list.
Best regards,
*Jason Bengtson, MLI
bengt...@ksu.edu
www.jasonbengtson.com
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Matt Sherman
wrote:
> I have no technical answers to the questions you pose, but I second Option
> #2.
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>
> > Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list
I would suggest Mailman: https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/
./r
On Mar 24, 2016 05:29, "Eric Lease Morgan" wrote:
> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be
> migrated before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible
> options for
I have no technical answers to the questions you pose, but I second Option
#2.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be
> migrated before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible
> op
Alas, the Code4Lib mailing list software will most likely need to be migrated
before the end of summer, and I’m proposing a number possible options for the
lists continued existence.
I have been managing the Code4Lib mailing list since its inception about twelve
years ago. This work has been
This is mailing list administratativia. I don’t know why, but the subscription
base seem to now increase by two or three a day. I guess this is a good day.
Maybe I ought to visualize this. Hmmm... —ELM
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Eric Hellman wrote:
> I assume you've discovered the word is usually spelled "administrivia".
>
> It's fun making up words. My latest is "bibliopotheosis"
>
It's also handy when the OED adds them too - less need to update local
spell check files on new machines.
Mine is "bibliounitarian" -- for those who believe in a single record
model for bibliographic data, as opposed to biblioquatritarians
(FRBR-ites) or biblioduotarians (Bibframers).
kc
On 6/9/14, 3:30 PM, Eric Hellman wrote:
I assume you've discovered the word is usually spelled "administrivia"
I assume you've discovered the word is usually spelled "administrivia".
It's fun making up words. My latest is "bibliopotheosis"
On May 29, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> * Apparently “administratativia” is a word of my own design because a search
> of it in Google returns only
A reminder.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Eric Lease Morgan
> Date: May 29, 2014 at 9:23:31 AM CDT
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: [CODE4LIB] mailing list administratativia
> Reply-To: Code for Libraries
>
> This is some mailing list administratativia.*
&g
This is some mailing list administratativia.*
Buried deep in the dark (unindexed by Google) Web is a paragraph describing the
purpose of the Code4Lib mailing list:
The purpose of the Code4Lib mailing is to provide a forum for
discussing the use of computers in libraries, usually in the form
Here is the tiniest bit of mailing list administratativa: the list now contains
close two 2,800 subscribers, and based on my antidotal observations, it
subscription size increase by approximately five new subscriptions per week. I
think we have a strong, vibrant, and growing community. —ELM
alright. but only because an absurdly large part of me is annoyed that we
only got 299 responses, I kept hoping for one more person to make it to 300.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Rosalyn Metz wrote:
>
> > Yay! We had a 13.2% response
On Dec 3, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Rosalyn Metz wrote:
> Yay! We had a 13.2% response rate.
Please send the URL of the survey out to the mailing list at least one more
time. I'm sure you will get at least one more resonant, me. --Earache
m hoping that we got a decent sample
> size.
>
> There are 2,250 subscribers to the Code4Lib mailing list. "Long live
> Code4Lib" (That sort of rhymes.) --ELM
>
> Can you tell me how many people are on the list? I'm curious for the
> results of the gender survey. I'm hoping that we got a decent sample size.
There are 2,250 subscribers to the Code4Lib mailing list. "Long live Code4Lib"
(That sort of rhymes.) --ELM
Hey Eric,
Can you tell me how many people are on the list? I'm curious for the
results of the gender survey. I'm hoping that we got a decent sample size.
Rosalyn
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> As the Code4Lib LISTSERV manager, I am able to make a number of antido
As the Code4Lib LISTSERV manager, I am able to make a number of antidotal
mailing list observations from the past few weeks:
* The volume of mailing list traffic always surges just before the annual
meeting, but the conversation this time around was much broader than in
previous years. This t
For better or for worse, one the many Code4Lib Mailing List Home Pages, has
been moved to the following address because the host where it resided is all
but defunct - http://dh.crc.nd.edu/sandbox/mailing-lists/code4lib/ FYI
--
Eric Lease Morgan
Hesburgh Libraries
University of Notre Dame
574
If I may be so bold, if users would start the subject with a period and main
topic, ie: .CONTENTdm Then in the case started here it would be
[CODE4LIB].CONTENTdm Is there a (current) CONTENTdm support group?
could easily be filtered on [CODE4LIB].CONTENTdm or just .CONTENTdm
or .xforms, .solr
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Ethan Gruber wrote:
> True, but I'm hesitant to post mundane bits of code that are irrelevant to
> most of the user base here. It may be worth discussing XForms in more
> detail on code4lib, though, since the xforms4lib list never quite took off
> with only a han
you post this as I'm right at the beginning of looking at Omeka
> > and was thinking of posting a query somewhere [?] to see if anyone has
> > done a recent product comparison.
>
>
> Just a couple of things regarding the Code4Lib mailing list. First, the
> list membership c
; and was thinking of posting a query somewhere [?] to see if anyone has
> done a recent product comparison.
Just a couple of things regarding the Code4Lib mailing list. First, the list
membership continues to grow at a constant rate, about one or two people every
two or three days. The m
ies [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Eric
> Hellman
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] mailing list administratativia
>
> I vote for changing the limit threshold to
>
> PI * (eventual le
hat it has to be a rational number.
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf
> Of
> >>> Eric
> >>> Hellman
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM
> >
hink the constraint is that it has to be a rational number.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
>>> Eric
>>> Hellman
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM
>>>
>> I think the constraint is that it has to be a rational number.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
>> Eric
>> Hellman
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM
>> To: CODE4
riginal Message-
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
> Eric
> Hellman
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] mailing list administratativia
>
> I vote for changing the lim
tional number.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
>Eric
>Hellman
>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM
>To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
>Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] mailing list administratativia
>
>I vote for cha
I think the constraint is that it has to be a rational number.
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Eric
Hellman
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:58 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] mailing list
I vote for changing the limit threshold to
PI * (eventual length of this meta-thread).
On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Alexander Johannesen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Doran, Michael D wrote:
>> Can that limit threshold be raised? If so, are there reasons why it should
>>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Chris Fitzpatrick wrote:
> +1 to the "this discussion is really depressing me" camp.
Ok, ok, I get the message. This is no place to voice strong opinions
about bad library tech, and my (different, but not bad) language nor
stance (contrarian, but not accusatory
FWIW, the "daily-threshold" limit on a LISTSERV(tm) list can easily be
set to any value by the listowner; it can also be manually overridden by
the owner in specific cases with a "release" command (which retains the
limit but allows continued distribution on the day the limit is reached).
Using th
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> Pretty sure it wasn't depressing to the vast majority of the listserv
> audience. That was/is a discussion that benefited from a "timeout period",
> like you give the pre-schoolers.
Given we're adults, and not in pre-school, I disagree.
I'd like to once again point out the 50-message limit, and the fact
that this thread is rapidly chewing through that 50.
Surely there are some "code" or "lib" topics folks want to discuss.
-Mike
+1 to the "this discussion is really depressing me" camp.
On Oct 27, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
Is it to throttle spam or something? 50 seems rather low, and it's
rather depressing to have a lively discussion throttled like that.
Not
Pre
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
Is it to throttle spam or something? 50 seems rather low, and it's
rather depressing to have a lively discussion throttled like that. Not
Pretty sure it wasn't depressing to the vast majority of the listserv
audience. That was/is a discussion that benefited f
I believe the software documentation suggests a limit to put a stop to mail
loops.
Peter
On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Alexander Johannesen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Doran, Michael D wrote:
>> Can that limit threshold be raised? If so, are there reasons why it should
>> not
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Doran, Michael D wrote:
> Can that limit threshold be raised? If so, are there reasons why it should
> not be raised?
Is it to throttle spam or something? 50 seems rather low, and it's
rather depressing to have a lively discussion throttled like that. Not
to men
This is a tiny bit of mailing list administratativia:
1) there are about 1,500 hundred of us
2) we are from all over the world
3) the largest group is from gmail.com
4) the mailing list is configured to stop
processing after 50 message are sent in one day
5) 50 messages were sent on
I have resurrected a home page for our mailing list. See:
http://dewey.library.nd.edu/mailing-lists/code4lib/
No great shakes. Just providing some simple instructions. FYI.
BTW, there are about 1,300 of us.
--
Eric Morgan
University of Notre Dame
This is a bit of mailing list administratativa.
First, the list turned itself off yesterday because we exceeded the 50
messages/day limit. Hmmm... I have turned the list back on.
Second, you can manage your subscription at the following URL. You
might want to turn on digest mode:
http:/
Here is a bit of Code4Lib mailing list administratativia.
First of all, our membership is now over a thousand people. While the
NGC4Lib mailing list has more subscribers, the Code4Lib mailing lists
grows at a steady and constant rate. The growth of the NGC4Lib list
has s l o o o w e d
This is a bit of mailing list administratativia.
Specifically, there was a rogue mail server in France that seems to
have been redirecting mail back to our list. This was causing many
duplicate postings. Weird. The address our postings were being sent to
has been removed from the subscription lis
On Apr 2, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
http://listserv.nd.edu/archives/code4lib.html
I have restored the Code4Lib Mailing List home page, see:
http://dewey.library.nd.edu/mailing-lists/code4lib/
Thank you for bringing its disappearance to my attention. Archives of
the list
I am not ignoring y'all, really, and here is some mailing list
administratativia.
There are many versions of the archives. Think, "Lot's of copies keep
stuff safe". The one-stop-shop interface to just about everything
where you can change your subscription options, even though it is
painfully s
For a good time, I have been playing with a new version of the
code4lib mailing list archives:
http://dewey.library.nd.edu/mailing-lists/code4lib/mail/
There you will find the (re-)beginnings of a browsable and searchable
collection of our postings along with all of the guts that make it
82 matches
Mail list logo
