Adding a flag to the ban command "/msg X ban [-w] <#chan> " and a new column in the ban table would make it possible
the use of regular expressions without restrictions, still.. wouldn't
solve the cpu time problem.
On 7/6/07, Perry Lorier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brad Campbell wrote:
> Fahim
Brad Campbell wrote:
Fahim Chachar wrote:
Dear coders,
I'd like to suggest an idea to improve X that is there has to be some
enhacements in BANS of X. Such as:
If there is a person who contains 2 numbers in his ident, I'd make X
to ban his nickname. That could be 2 3 4 etc numbers, in his i
Fahim Chachar wrote:
Dear coders,
I'd like to suggest an idea to improve X that is there has to be some
enhacements in BANS of X. Such as:
If there is a person who contains 2 numbers in his ident, I'd make X to
ban his nickname. That could be 2 3 4 etc numbers, in his ident or his
nickname
Dear coders,I'd like to suggest an idea to improve X that is there has to be
some enhacements in BANS of X. Such as:If there is a person who contains 2
numbers in his ident, I'd make X to ban his nickname. That could be 2 3 4 etc
numbers, in his ident or his nickname or his host and X would ban
