On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 22:22 -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> Just so people are not left wondering, I have better ways to spend my
> time than to debunk emails that are driven by emotion and ignorance of
> the subject matter(s) at hand.
> ___
> Coder-com ma
Just so people are not left wondering, I have better ways to spend my
time than to debunk emails that are driven by emotion and ignorance of
the subject matter(s) at hand.
___
Coder-com mailing list
Coder-com@undernet.org
http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/l
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Michael Poole wrote:
> Unless someone presents more compelling arguments in favor of the
> idea, I do not expect to add SSL support to ircu.
>
>
I would have thought privacy would be compelling enough?
What about those other servers out there that are standalon
Unless someone presents more compelling arguments in favor of the
idea, I do not expect to add SSL support to ircu.
On the networking side of things, it does little to protect users from
the kind of surveillance you describe: If an adversary is recording
metadata, they will get substantively the s
