On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 22:22 -0400, Michael Poole wrote: > Just so people are not left wondering, I have better ways to spend my > time than to debunk emails that are driven by emotion and ignorance of > the subject matter(s) at hand. > _______________________________________________ > Coder-com mailing list > Coder-com@undernet.org > http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
What subject matters Michael? If you're referring to Laura's statement about legal matters, I have to agree with her, the world is not bound, or driven, by U.S. law. If you're a U.S. citizen then you might be, but I'm an aussie, and like majority on the people of this planet, sure as hell are not, that's not being spiteful, it's about being factual. Emotion is what drives a lot of people about privacy, and some are more passionate about it than others, doesn't mean it is wrong. You might not like it, but the world _is_ outraged at how the U.S. Govt is acting, christ, even the U.S. people are outraged by their own govt's actions, albeit for slightly different reasons, but all still under the same program. To shut down an idea based on one countries laws, you may not have intended it to come across as such, but it certainly does sound like it, does truly set off alarm bells about the project, although I suspect there is far more to that, given many other popular software based in the U.S., like sendmail, postifx, apache - and the list goes on, can do it within law, no reason why ircu can not. In an age where most security experts are encouraging the use of SSL for everything, I too think it makes sense to move forward in that direction by incorporating SSL into ircu.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
