It was a statement of what the EMail was intended to be. A feature
request. But, I found after asking it from the responses that some
parts of it were misunderstandings on my part and others were items that
would be extremely difficult to ever be able to put in.
Anything else that does not make
Hmm... Ok.
First -- thank you everyone who has replied. Isomer/stoney`/Richard/Kev
-- and whoever else replies after this of course.
Some response to Kev inline.
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 20:28, Kev wrote:
> X is able to see through this mask, always, because of the way it's
> connected to the net
eople abusing the cloaking feature? I have users who are
changing there nick!user@ portion of their hostmask in order to pretend
to be other users or defeat bans set on a cloaked hostmask.
That's all. Thank you very much for your time.
Jay Gairson
