Re: [Coder-Com] bug with notice ?

2002-04-24 Thread Lee H
ays seen to be replying lest they end up in a loop with another automaton. It dictates you may never send an error message back to a NOTICE, hence, you dont see one. :) -- - Lee H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // fl_ @ ircnet - - Any fool can criticize,

Re: [Coder-Com] /whois nick nick issue?

2002-04-16 Thread Lee H
ust me again? This is part of the CFV-165 code (HEAD_IN_SAND), admins can optionally remove idletimes on a global whois, as will be the case here. -- - Lee H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // fl_ @ ircnet - - Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain, and most fools do. -

Re: [Coder-Com] new /whois line backwards?

2002-04-12 Thread Lee H
source target (idletime) (signontime) :seconds idle, signon time -- - Lee H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // fl_ @ ircnet - - Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain, and most fools do. -- Benjamin Franklin

Re: [Coder-Com] isupport tags

2002-02-22 Thread Lee H
ts worth it.. -- - Lee H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // fl_ @ ircnet - - Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain, and most fools do. -- Benjamin Franklin

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Lee H
or the server should just reply with: :nick!user@host MODE #channel +b *!~*@* and ignore the other three completely.. -- - Lee H // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // fl_ @ ircnet - - WARNING: Due to a technical fault this email is not compatible - with americans. Viewer discretion is advised.

Re: [Coder-Com] .11 feature/bug ?

2001-12-04 Thread Lee H
es the whole point.. Most (including ircu?) ircds will either not allow topics from non-members, or not allow topics from non-members on +s channels, so some protection already exists. -- - Lee H // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // fl_ @ ircnet - - WARNING: Due to a technical fault th