On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 01:08:03AM -0500, placket kidney wrote:
> I'm also wondering if I can find mention of just the prefix to the
> channel name in any RFCs out there (I sort of wonder how NOTICE ever
> got the ability to prefix a channel with a mode's symbolic character,
> since it seems like a
placket kidney writes:
> This puzzles me, and I suppose there is a good reason for it:
> Suppose I send "WALLVOICES #test :Hello voices!"
> Another client in the channel sees ": NOTICE @#test :+ Hello voices!"
> It seems that it should logically be "+#test", although the message
> portion is obvio
This puzzles me, and I suppose there is a good reason for it:
Suppose I send "WALLVOICES #test :Hello voices!"
Another client in the channel sees ": NOTICE @#test :+ Hello voices!"
It seems that it should logically be "+#test", although the message
portion is obviously formatted so humans can tell
