Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-Common-trunk #784

See Changes: [sseth] YARN-719. Move RMIdentifier from Container to ContainerTokenIdentifier. Contributed by Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli. [vinodkv] HADOOP-9574. Fix for timing issues in the original patch's test-case. [vinodkv] YARN-63

Re: Error in protobuf definitions

It's up as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4866 On 29 May 2013 21:53, Arpit Agarwal wrote: > Ralph, could you please file a Jira? We'll fix it. > > -Arpit > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > > > Hi folks > > > > On line 228 of > > hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hd

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > All, > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.4.1-alpha that I would > like to release. > > This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues > discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 rel

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9607) Fixes in Javadoc build

Timothy St. Clair created HADOOP-9607: - Summary: Fixes in Javadoc build Key: HADOOP-9607 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9607 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

I see you just re-opened MAPREUDCE-4211. Why not include MAPREDUCE-4211 as well rather than create one release per patch? Also, this is the first time we are seeing a four-numbered scheme in Hadoop. Why not call this 2.0.5-alpha? Arun On May 24, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

Sorry, it should be MAPREDUCE-5211 (not MAPREDUCE-4211). thanks, Arun On May 30, 2013, at 10:57 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I see you just re-opened MAPREUDCE-4211. > > Why not include MAPREDUCE-4211 as well rather than create one release per > patch? > > Also, this is the first time we are se

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9608) ZKFC should abort if it sees an unrecognized NN become active

Todd Lipcon created HADOOP-9608: --- Summary: ZKFC should abort if it sees an unrecognized NN become active Key: HADOOP-9608 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9608 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9609) Remove sh dependency of bin-package target

Chuan Liu created HADOOP-9609: - Summary: Remove sh dependency of bin-package target Key: HADOOP-9609 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9609 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:57AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > I see you just re-opened MAPREUDCE-5211. > > Why not include MAPREDUCE-5211 as well rather than create one release per > patch? Arun, it is unclear if MAPREDUCE-5211 has implications in 2.0.4 as per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MA

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9610) Missing pom dependency in MR-client

Timothy St. Clair created HADOOP-9610: - Summary: Missing pom dependency in MR-client Key: HADOOP-9610 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9610 Project: Hadoop Common Issue T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

+1 I verified checksums, the signature, built sources on CentOS, ran tests and a few hadoop commands. Thanks, --Konst On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > All, > > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.4.1-alpha that I > would > like to release. > > Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.8

+1 Downloaded the release and ran a few basic tests. --Bobby On 5/28/13 11:00 AM, "Thomas Graves" wrote: > >I've created a release candidate (RC0) for hadoop-0.23.8 that I would like >to release. > >This release is a sustaining release with several important bug fixes in >it. The most critica

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

> Why not call this 2.0.5-alpha? Technically, current branch-2 uses 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT and produces maven artifacts with that version. So having another version with the same numbers will be confusing. Therefore 4-level numbers. I thought I mentioned it to you before. Thanks, --Konst On Thu, May 30

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9611) mvn-rpmbuild against google-guice > 3.0 yields missing cglib dependency

Timothy St. Clair created HADOOP-9611: - Summary: mvn-rpmbuild against google-guice > 3.0 yields missing cglib dependency Key: HADOOP-9611 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9611 Pro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Why not include MAPREDUCE-4211 as well rather than create one release per > patch? >From Cos's description, it sounded like these were backports of fixes to help Sqoop2 and fix some build issues. If it's not just to fixup leftover bugs in

Cannot update "PoweredBy" wiki page

Hi, When uploading new content (and information about my company), I got the exception "Sorry, can not save page because "rubbelloselotto.de" is not allowed in this wiki." How could I solve it? Kind regards, Adam

[RELEASE PLAN] Hadoop 1.2.1 stabilization RC on about 6/7

Colleagues, Next weekend, starting the evening of Friday 7 June, a week from tomorrow, I plan to cut a hadoop-1.2.1-rc0 from the branch-1.2 branch. This is intended to be a stabilization release of 1.2. I request that major new back-ports, or any change with significant risk, be put in branch-1 f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On the version number we use, if it is greater than 2.0.4, I really don't care. Though I think Konstantin argument that branch-2 is publishing as 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT has some ground (still, it could be argued that they are DEV JARs so they can be in flux). On the changes that went into this RC, they a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

There's no misunderstanding Chris - this release is to unblock downstream. As for your question: I don't have a crystal ball; I wish though. I think the answer depends on will be there more blocking bugs found in the later releases of Bigtop or other downstream components. This is bugfix release a

Re: Cannot update "PoweredBy" wiki page

Someone with proper karma needs to add you into ACL for this page. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:14PM, Adam Kawa wrote: > Hi, > > When uploading new content (and information about my company), I got the > exception > "Sorry, can not save page because "rubbelloselotto.de" is not allowed in > this wik

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

Hi Cos, I would also request that you renumber the release candidate to just three-numbers, hence "2.0.5-alpha". Arun, are you willing to start the 2.1.x name-space for your next release, so that 2.0.x-alpha can become an intermediate stabilization branch as Cos and Konst want? I just think that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > There's no misunderstanding Chris - this release is to unblock downstream. > > As for your question: I don't have a crystal ball; I wish though. I think the > answer depends on will be there more blocking bugs found in the later releases

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:18PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > There's no misunderstanding Chris - this release is to unblock downstream. > > > > As for your question: I don't have a crystal ball; I wish though. I think > > the > > answer de

Re: Cannot update "PoweredBy" wiki page

Could someone please add me? I promise not to break anything ;) 2013/5/31 Konstantin Boudnik > Someone with proper karma needs to add you into ACL for this page. > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:14PM, Adam Kawa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When uploading new content (and information about my company),

Re: Cannot update "PoweredBy" wiki page

Hey Adam, If you create a user ID for the Hadoop wiki and send it to me I'll update this page which will give you perms. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ContributorsGroup On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Adam Kawa wrote: > Could someone please add me? I promise not to break anything ;) > > > 2013

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:11PM, Matt Foley wrote: > Hi Cos, > I would also request that you renumber the release candidate to just > three-numbers, hence "2.0.5-alpha". > > Arun, are you willing to start the 2.1.x name-space for your next release, > so that 2.0.x-alpha can become an intermediate

Re: Cannot update "PoweredBy" wiki page

Hi Eli, My user ID is: AdamKawa Thanks a lot! Adam 2013/5/31 Eli Collins > Hey Adam, > > If you create a user ID for the Hadoop wiki and send it to me I'll > update this page which will give you perms. > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ContributorsGroup > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Ad

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

FWIW, not that I have a dog in this fight, but the only release with a 4th number (not including .0 like the 0.20.20x releases did) we had was: http://hadoop.6.n7.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-0-17-2-1-rc-0-td13398.html 0.17.2 was missing some native libs so 0.17.2.1 was released to fix that critical i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:08PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > FWIW, not that I have a dog in this fight, but the only release with a > 4th number (not including .0 like the 0.20.20x releases did) we had > was: > > http://hadoop.6.n7.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-0-17-2-1-rc-0-td13398.html > > 0.17.2 was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > There's no plans to release anything else at this point - this is a bug-fix > release, as I pointed out on a numerous occasions. There's no new features - > just 2 fixes. If you're worried about extending the voting by a week, I don't t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:30PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > There's no plans to release anything else at this point - this is a bug-fix > > release, as I pointed out on a numerous occasions. There's no new features - > > just 2 fixes. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I have no issues of changing the version to 2.0.5-alpha and restarting to vote > for the release content, e.g. 2 bug fixes. Shall I call 3 days re-vote because > of the number change? +1 Sounds great. > Does the result of bylaw vote nu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

Konstantin, Cos, As we change from 2.0.4.1 to 2.0.5 you'll need to do the following housekeeping as you work the new RC. * rename the svn branch * update the versions in the POMs * update the CHANGES.txt in trunk, branch-2 and the release branch * change the current 2.0.5 version in JIRA to 2.1.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

Sounds like a plan. Thanks, --Konst On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > Konstantin, Cos, > > As we change from 2.0.4.1 to 2.0.5 you'll need to do the following > housekeeping as you work the new RC. > > * rename the svn branch > * update the versions in the POMs > * upd

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

Thanks Alejandro, that's what my plan for the morning. Thanks for putting together the check-list - would be easier for me not to miss anything. I am aiming to have the bits out by noon or so. Appreciate the help! Cos On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:41PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > Konstantin, Cos,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.4.1-alpha

This started out as something and ended up as something else altogether. In any case, I think you should give a fresh heads up outside this thread. There are a bunch of commits and merges happening into branch-2 and thus 2.0.5, so it'll be safe to have an explicit hold-off/all-clear signaling.