Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

+1 for including the YARN-7190 patch in 3.0.3 release. This is a fix that will enable HBase to use Hadoop 3.0.x in the production line. thanks Vrushali On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Yongjun Zhang wrote: > Thanks Wei-Chiu and Haibo for the feedback! > > Good thing is

Re: Hdfs build on branch-2 are failing.

Seeing the same for branch-2 yarn patches as well. On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Rushabh Shah wrote: > Hi All, > Recently couple of my hdfs builds failed on branch-2. > Slave id# H9 > Builds that failed: >

Re: Can't pull the trunk code in windows- >File name too long

Thanks for the update Brahma. > On Mar 14, 2018, at 7:12 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula > wrote: > > Hi, > > Able to clone/pull after setting the following. > > git config --system core.longpaths true > > > --Brahma Reddy Battula > > -Original Message- >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

Hi Vinod, bq. (b) We need to figure out if this V1 TimelineService should even be support given ATSv2. Yes, I am following this discussion. Let me chat with Rohith and Varun about this and we will respond on this thread. As such, my preliminary thoughts are that we should continue to support

Re: Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch2+JDK7 on Linux/x86

Hi Allen, I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7380 for the timeline service findbugs warnings. thanks Vrushali On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > I’m really confused why this causes the Yahoo! QA boxes to go

Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch YARN-5355 (Timeline Service v2) to trunk

Timeline Service v2 should be landing on branch2 shortly. thanks Vrushali On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Vrushali C <vrushalic2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone. > > It has been over a week (~9 days) since TSv2 has been merged to trunk with > no problems thus far. W

Re: Access to confluence wiki

I would like to get access to the Hadoop Wiki as well. My apache id is "vrushali". thanks Vrushali On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Subru Krishnan wrote: > Hi, > > Can I get access to the Hadoop wiki. My confluence is "subru". > > TIA. > > -Subru >

Re: [DISCUSS] Looking to a 2.9.0 release

As I mentioned in the [VOTE] thread at [1], for Timeline Service v2, we are thinking about merging to branch2 some time in the next couple of weeks. So far, we have been maintaining a branch2 based YARN-5355_branch2 along with our trunk based feature branch YARN-5355. Varun Saxena has been

Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch YARN-5355 (Timeline Service v2) to trunk

And can be an easy reference point to look at who had contributed what >> > without having to go back to the branch. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Varun Saxena. >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Vrushali C <vrushalic2...@gmail.com> >> &g

Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch YARN-5355 (Timeline Service v2) to trunk

trunk needs all the evolutionary history >> of a build. >> >> What should our policy/process be here? >> >> I do currently plan to merge the s3guard in as one single squashed patch; >> just getting HADOOP-14809 sorted first. >> >> >> > On 30

Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch YARN-5355 (Timeline Service v2) to trunk

I'm adding my +1 (binding) to conclude the vote. With 13 +1's (11 binding) and no -1's, the vote passes. We'll get on with the merge to trunk shortly. Thanks everyone! Regards Vrushali On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:54 AM, varunsax...@apache.org < varun.saxena.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1

Re: Branch merges and 3.0.0-beta1 scope

bq. I don't think it's a lot to ask that feature leads shoot an email to the release manager of their target version. DISCUSS emails right before a proposed merge VOTE are way too late, it ends up being a fire drill where we need to scramble on many fronts. Yes, I have been thinking about this

Re: [DISCUSS] Branches and versions for Hadoop 3

Hi Andrew, As Rohith mentioned, if you are good with it, from the TSv2 side, we are ready to go for merge tonight itself (Pacific time) right after the voting period ends. Varun Saxena has been diligently rebasing up until now so most likely our merge should be reasonably straightforward.

Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch YARN-5355 (Timeline Service v2) to trunk

Hi Subru, Thanks for your vote and your response! Regarding your question about merging to branch2, I think, after the merge to trunk is done, it will be good to merge to branch-2 as soon as we can. A lot of testing with trunk has been done presently and it will be good to repeat the same with

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-10550) HttpAuthentication.html is out of date

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vrushali C resolved HADOOP-10550. - Resolution: Not A Problem Closing as "Not a problem". > HttpAuthenticatio