Yes, the patch is fine. Unfortunately I cannot apply it because I have
no commit rights, so we will have to wait until a commiter has some time.
But I think it should be applied as soon as possible to avoid new users
being confused.
Oli
Tim Reilly schrieb:
RE:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25583.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25583.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25112.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Configuration exhibits all of the qualities of a component that should be in
Commons proper:
- It's small and focused.
- It's API is well defined
- It has a group of existing Jakarta committers providing code, ideas, and
support.
- It has good unit test coverage. It has also been tested in real
geirm 2003/12/17 04:49:35
Modified:jexl/src/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/parser ASTAddNode.java
Log:
Patch from Robert McIntosh to add string contat via +. Not totally sure if
we want it this way... but lets see what people thingk.
Also fixed problem that should have been
Intresting. This is not what the JSP EL does. Not that we really
care, but it's an interesting extension. It follows Java, I suppose :)
Patch in - lets see what people think.
geir
On Dec 15, 2003, at 8:55 PM, Robert wrote:
Attached is a patch for the ASTAddNode class that will do a string
+1
Configuration adheres to the Commons charter, and that it has a community.
Tim
Eric Pugh wrote:
Configuration exhibits all of the qualities of a component that should be in
Commons proper:
- It's small and focused.
- It's API is well defined
- It has a group of existing Jakarta committers
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=JELLY-100
Here is an overview of the issue:
epugh 2003/12/17 08:56:30
Modified:configuration/xdocs examples.xml
Log:
Fix up example. Thanks Tim Reilly!
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/configuration/xdocs/examples.xml
Index: examples.xml
I have implemented the reloading strategy suggested by Oliver. I
introduced a PersistentConfiguration interface defining the load() and
save() methods, the ReloadableConfiguration decorator only accepts
instances of PersistenConfiguration. Also I fixed the missing clear()
method in the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25459.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Scott Howlett
Created: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:43 AM
Body:
Please see also this issue and patch that I submitted a while ago:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=JELLY-85
I have a simple validation mechanism that I often use for unit testing,
and I'm curious to see if it can be fit into [validator] somehow.
I defined a Validator interface, which contains methods which can return
a boolean or throw an exception. Usually in my tests I prefer fail-fast
behavior, so I
--- __matthewHawthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a simple validation mechanism that I often use for unit testing,
and I'm curious to see if it can be fit into [validator] somehow.
I defined a Validator interface, which contains methods which can return
a boolean or throw an exception.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25598.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25598.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
ggregory2003/12/17 12:31:31
Modified:vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider
DelegateFileObject.java AbstractFileObject.java
vfs/src/test/org/apache/commons/vfs/test
ProviderWriteTests.java
rwaldhoff2003/12/17 12:52:30
Modified:functor build.xml
Log:
add test.home to test.classpath, so that the resource files can be found
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +2 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/functor/build.xml
Index: build.xml
The (manually created) build.xml file in the commons-functor CVS tree now
includes ${test.home} within ${test.classpath}, which fixes this problem.
I'd recommend that gump use that, rather than a maven-generated build.xml.
Thanks for pointing this out Stefan.
- Rod
rwaldhoff2003/12/17 13:02:49
Modified:functor/src/test/org/apache/commons/functor/core
TestAll.java
Removed: functor/src/test/org/apache/commons/functor/core
TestConstantFunction.java
rwaldhoff2003/12/17 13:03:17
Modified:functor/src/java/org/apache/commons/functor Algorithms.java
Log:
fix javadoc warning
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +3 -5
jakarta-commons-sandbox/functor/src/java/org/apache/commons/functor/Algorithms.java
Index:
It says 'DBUtils' at the bottom of the proposal :)
That said, I'm in favour of promotion. +1
Hen
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I wouldn't call it mature yet, but it meets the criteria for promotion
IMHO. BTW, sorry for not contributing more, but I do plan to use it at
rwaldhoff2003/12/17 14:05:26
Modified:functor/src/test/org/apache/commons/functor/example/kata/four
DataMunger.java
Log:
add a bit of whitespace
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +7 -7
rwaldhoff2003/12/17 14:13:52
Modified:functor/src/test/org/apache/commons/functor/example/kata/four
ToInteger.java TestSoccer.java IsInteger.java
Abs.java TestWeather.java NthColumn.java
DataMunger.java
Log:
add
rwaldhoff2003/12/17 14:15:11
Modified:functor/src/test/org/apache/commons/functor/example/kata/four
DataMunger.java
Log:
add comments
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +3 -3
+1
i did find i have a few observations after taking a quick look (but i
don't think that there's anything here to stop promotion)...
i did happen to notice that some of the licenses have copyright ending
in 2002.
i couldn't get the maven documentation build to run. it's probably just
a
[partially fantasy land/future ideas]
The Jakarta Commons charter basically views Commons as a supplier of
Jakarta projects, and not Apache projects in general.
With many of the Jakarta sub-projects moving to TLP status [ie)
ant.apache.org etc], this is increasingly untrue. Jelly's main
Eric Pugh wrote:
[... a good list of reasons to move Configuration to Commons ...]
+1
The initial committers on the DBUtils component shall be:
^
|
???
--- Noel
I'm fairly new to the Apache scene, but I think I like the idea. I
think that Jakarta Commons is buried down deeper than it should be.
Some of the projects such as [digester] and [jxpath] are so gosh darn
useful that they deserve to be in a more visible space.
However, I'm not sure that I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25609.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, __matthewHawthorne wrote:
However, I'm not sure that I understand your suggestion about Jakarta
Commons becoming top level, and then being joined by Apache Commons. I
think it should be the other way around -- Jakarta Commons projects
should become Apache Commons
If that's the case, why not try to promote them to Jakarta proper? I
know little of jxpath, but Digester seems like it would fit under
Libraries, Tools, and APIs.
--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net
__matthewHawthorne wrote:
I think that Jakarta Commons is buried down
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16881.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Oleg, I do agree that the bug as described in bugzilla is not serious for
the reasons you mention below. However, if you recall our discussion
(http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=commons-httpclient-dev@
jakarta.apache.orgmsgNo=5279 ) the serious issue is caused by the
underlying
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25529.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25592.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25370.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
43 matches
Mail list logo
