Date: 2004-07-06T01:12:25
Editor: 212.234.211.26
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: LocalSpellingWords
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/LocalSpellingWords
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -96,3
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-modeler has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29932.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Then we should significantly change the content of the web site -- eliminating most of
the maven reports. We will also need a way to acknowledge contributors in a timely
way and to maintain an up-to-date task list. It is much simpler, IMHO, to use maven
to do all of this (actually a good bit
Unsubscribe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-commons/pool/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl
GenericObjectPool.java
dirkv 2004/07/04 10:28:19
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29932.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Unsubscribe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 8:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29294] - [lang][PATCH] lang.math.Fraction
class deficiencies
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 30 Jun 04, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project commons-resources *no longer* has an issue.
Not that I fixed it by adding a dependency on Hibernate (and
installing Hibernate on the Gump boxes).
Please note also that Hibernate's license is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
If no one else does, I'll commit to taking a look on Saturday.
Bugzilla is a nice way to send in attachments if you're having email
problems with them. Just create an issue for Commons Lang and attach your
code.
Hen
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'm currently working on a
Yet, consider the case; To make a modification to documentation for a
previous version that was taged in the CVS, you would need to branch and
commit you changes to the branch, this would mean that if you wanted to
publish these changes using maven, you would need it to checkout the
latest
On 5 Jul 2004, at 01:37, Niall Pemberton wrote:
snip
The Lazy bean patches are two new dyna bean classes and involve no
changes
to existing code - plus there are two new junit test cases to test
these
classes.
true
If I add these new classes in and someone comes back later and
objects, they
can
Hi there
If no one else does, I'll commit to taking a look
on Saturday.
Bugzilla is a nice way to send in attachments
if you're having email
problems with them. Just create an issue for Commons Lang and attach
your
code.
I appreciate your help, but my suggestion
was not a bug-fix-issue. I have
leosutic2004/07/06 13:43:42
Log:
Promotion to Commons proper.
Status:
Vendor Tag: commons_sandbox
Release Tags: commons_promotion
N jakarta-commons/attributes/.cvsignore
N jakarta-commons/attributes/build.xml
N jakarta-commons/attributes/LICENSE.txt
N
FYI, the best way to get something like this added to [lang] is to create a Bugzilla
issue and attach your pro/cons, attach your source code *including* unit tests.
Unit tests are probably the best way to insure that your code will get the attention
you seek.
Cheers,
Gary
leosutic2004/07/06 14:00:45
Removed: attributes .cvsignore LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt build.xml
maven.xml project.properties project.xml
attributes/api project.xml
attributes/api/src/java overview.html
leosutic2004/07/06 14:31:52
Modified:attributes project.xml
attributes/api/src/java overview.html
attributes/site project.properties
attributes/site/xdocs changelog.xml index.xml
Log:
Changes resulting from the move to commons proper.
Robert,
What do we need to do to push beanutils forward? Is it a case of reviewing
the open bugs which are not Serverity enhancement and deciding what to do
about them?
I'll review (at least some of) these tonight. Any I think I can help with,
I'll try to make some time this week to fix them,
olegk 2004/07/06 15:00:17
Modified:httpclient release_notes.txt
Log:
Changelog update: PR# 29549, 29383, 29883, 29874
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +13 -0 jakarta-commons/httpclient/release_notes.txt
Index: release_notes.txt
olegk 2004/07/06 15:01:05
Modified:httpclient Tag: HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH release_notes.txt
Log:
Changelog update: PR# 29549
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.9.2.11 +2 -0
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Henri Yandell wrote:
Options:
a) cvs remove everything and add a README.txt or STATUS.html to indicate
that it is dead.
b) kill it. I effectively did this with 'io' as I merely moved the old
sandbox repo bodily over into the main commons module.
c) cvs remove everything, then
Yeah, when you see 'Bugzilla' read it as 'Issuezilla'. The Bug word in the
title was a mistake I reckon :)
Hen
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there
If no one else does, I'll commit to taking a look on Saturday.
Bugzilla is a nice way to send in attachments if you're having
I agree the name is not great. I'm not sure the other suggestions convey the
method behavior either. I typically don't like adding a boolean to change
the behavior, but rather have a different method of similar name, but I
can't think of a great name either.
A few more suggestions:
-
Sounds like we should just rip the parseCVS code and send it to the bit
bucket. Anyone care if I just yank the currently commented out code?
Steven Caswell
Sun Certified Java Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and
degraded state of moral
StringUtils currently has no boolean flags in method args, and I want to
keep it that way.
splitAll?
'Split the string keeping All the tokens'
splitPreserve?
'Split the string Preserving all the tokens'
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Gary didn't like splitPreserve. I originally suggested splitPreserve so
that's fine by me. I could also go with splitAll.
And I agree, I don't like the boolean flags either.
Steven Caswell
Sun Certified Java Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The
edI am not making a big stink about this. My belief is that names are
important, especially in a library. I like to discuss such things./ed
Just to be more precise, what I am not fond of in splitVerb, as in
splitPreserve, is that *what* is to be preserved is not specified and
in my IMO not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:21 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
This vote is to approve the public release of commons codec 1.3-RC1.
[X] +1 Go ahead and release 1.3-RC1
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Don't release 1.3-RC1, because...
-
[X] +1 Go ahead and release 1.3-RC1
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:45:44 -0700, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:21 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
This vote is to approve the public release of commons codec 1.3-RC1.
[X] +1 Go ahead and release 1.3-RC1
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
How about 'splitPreserveTokens' ?
michael
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Gary Gregory wrote:
edI am not making a big stink about this. My belief is that names are
important, especially in a library. I like to discuss such things./ed
Just to be more precise, what I am not fond of in splitVerb, as
Gary Gregory wrote:
I am not that crazy with anything of the form parseProduct. What if
there was, or surely going to be 2, then 10 such methods for CVS. Then a
CvsUtils or some such class would be better. Does this belongs in a
separate class if not in the sandbox?
Sorry for not jumping into this
: 'Failed', Reason 'Build Failed'
Full details are available at:
http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-resources/index.html
That said, some snippets follow:
The following annotations were provided:
-DEBUG- Sole jar [commons-resources-20040706.jar] identifier set
Ahh.
I like the yesterday etc part, but name definitely needs to change. Also I
would want a formatter for it (somehow) so we can turn a Date into
'yesterday', '9 days ago' etc.
Hen
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Serge Knystautas wrote:
Gary Gregory wrote:
I am not that crazy with anything of the
+1
David
--- Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:21 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
This vote is to approve the public release of commons codec 1.3-RC1.
[X] +1 Go ahead and release 1.3-RC1
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Don't release 1.3-RC1, because...
niallp 2004/07/06 19:21:14
Modified:beanutils build.xml
Log:
Add the Test Cases for LazyDynaClass and LazyDynaBean to the ant build file
Revision ChangesPath
1.60 +34 -2 jakarta-commons/beanutils/build.xml
Index: build.xml
+1.
However:
No Javadoc link on the left. Becoming quite common to break that out of
the Project Reports section (especially as we in no way show that Project
Reports contains multiple entries).
Unsure if we've standardised on the Maven Feather logo or not.
Changes.xml says June 2004.
bayard 2004/07/06 22:08:06
Modified:lang DEVELOPERS-GUIDE.html
Log:
added the view that we should not use boolean arguments to overload methods of
similar signature
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +2 -1 jakarta-commons/lang/DEVELOPERS-GUIDE.html
Index:
+1.
Tokens is definitely the noun to use (took a while for me to get that a
String to be split is made up of separators and tokens). While we could
have splitPreservingEmptyTokens or something, splitPreservingTokens or
splitPreserveTokens seem fine.
Unsure if the verb should be current or past.
Changes seem fine to me. As MutableNumber extends Number, but is not in
itself Mutable, and yet implements Mutable, I don't think there's a need
for it. Just there for symmetry I presume.
It's handling only a couple of lines of shared code, so not a huge deal
there either.
Hen
On Mon, 5 Jul
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29636.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Have searched the archives, but cannot find an answer on how to submit a POST that has
form parameters that need to be encoded in UTF-8. I am setting the Content-Type
request header, but am unsure as how to set the request body. Do I use a
ByteArrayInputStream? Does anyone have an
Hi Grant,
The PostMethod contains support for setting form parameters. Please
take a look at PostMethod.addParameter(), PostMethod.setParameter() and
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/methods/post.html. When
using these parameters you will want to set the content type to
Hi,
I have a question concerning setting non HTTP headers for the GetMethod
request -
My servlet communicates with a (third-party) server (on IIS5.0) with
NTLM authentication and synchronization enabled. I tried setting the
headers using GetMethod class's setRequestHeader method.
49 matches
Mail list logo
