cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/email maven.xml

2004-11-11 Thread epugh
epugh 2004/11/11 01:08:46 Modified:emailmaven.xml Log: Update default goal to jar:jar from deprecated java:jar Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/maven.xml Index: maven.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/lib - New directory

2004-11-11 Thread epugh
epugh 2004/11/11 01:21:05 jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/lib - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/xdocs changes.xml

2004-11-11 Thread epugh
epugh 2004/11/11 01:22:02 Modified:emailproject.properties build.xml email/xdocs changes.xml Added: email/lib activation-1.0.2.jar javamail-1.3.2.jar Log: Use included /lib directory for Sun jars. Now maven and Ant build out of box! Revision

Re: [convert] Type Conversion Library

2004-11-11 Thread Ron Blaschke
Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 11:56:04 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 10 Nov 2004, at 22:46, Stephen Colebourne wrote: This is a legal question, and most of us aren't very good at those ;-( I believe that if your new work is derived directly from the original source you gave to the ASF,

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/email .cvsignore

2004-11-11 Thread epugh
epugh 2004/11/11 01:55:55 Modified:email.cvsignore Log: ignore junit property files Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +1 -0 jakarta-commons-sandbox/email/.cvsignore Index: .cvsignore === RCS

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30973] - [email] [patch] HTML email with plain text alternative and attachments

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30973. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30973] - [email] [patch] HTML email with plain text alternative and attachments

2004-11-11 Thread Corey Scott
Yes, this includes/superceeds all previous related changes. -Corey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java

2004-11-11 Thread niallp
niallp 2004/11/11 04:17:32 Modified:validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Tag: VALIDATOR_1_1_2_BRANCH Field.java Msg.java Log: Bug 29452 Enable Field/Msg to support all DTD attributes, based on patch submitted by Rich Wertz Changed Field to

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java

2004-11-11 Thread niallp
niallp 2004/11/11 04:18:25 Modified:validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java Log: Bug 29452 Enable Field/Msg to support all DTD attributes, based on patch submitted by Rich Wertz Changed Field to add getMsgObject(key) and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29452] - Field class Msg access mod

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29452. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[jelly] Caught exception evaluating:

2004-11-11 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Hi, One of the most frustrating place in jelly, to my taste, is when a jexl exception occurs... Jelly complains (at least with good logging settings) but does not throw. Moreover, this complaint doesn't have a jelly line-number which makes it somewhat hard. Is there really any wish that such

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java

2004-11-11 Thread David Graham
Can we change getMessageObject() to getMessage() ? Most everything in Java is an object so it's redundant. Also, getMsgs() doesn't read very well; what about getMessages() ? It would be good to add @since javadoc tags so people don't assume this functionality was there from the beginning.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29684] - [beanutils] BeanUtils copyProperties does not copy if theres a digit in property name

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29684. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java

2004-11-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
OK I'll do that. Niall - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 2:37 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java Can we

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31194] - [validator] Investigate removing arg position= attribute

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31194. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31194] - [validator] Investigate removing arg position= attribute

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31194. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java

2004-11-11 Thread niallp
niallp 2004/11/11 07:32:03 Modified:validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Tag: VALIDATOR_1_1_2_BRANCH Field.java Msg.java Log: Re-name getMsgObject() and getMsgs() methods Revision ChangesPath No revision No

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java

2004-11-11 Thread niallp
niallp 2004/11/11 07:32:49 Modified:validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java Log: Re-name getMsgObject() and getMsgs() methods Revision ChangesPath 1.35 +8 -6

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31017] - jsvc-src AUToCONF Bug

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31017. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/validator/src/share/org/apache/commons/validator Field.java Msg.java

2004-11-11 Thread David Graham
Thanks Niall! David --- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK I'll do that. Niall - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 2:37 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit:

[Validator] Next Release

2004-11-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
I decided to have a go a resolving a couple of Struts bugs to do with bundles/resources and validator: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18169 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21760 Currently theres an inconsitency in how Struts handles bundles since although the

Re: [all] (reprise) links to books (and similar resources)

2004-11-11 Thread Henri Yandell
I'm +1 to the Wiki. I didn't do an SF project for it; I just put more time into my www.pergamum.org open-source java book site. There are 4 books on Commons that I know of that should be added. 2 are close to publication. Then there are all the articles on particular components. Hen

Re: [convert] Type Conversion Library

2004-11-11 Thread Henri Yandell
It breaks down like this: You can do what you want with your own copy of any code you send in to Apache; it's only when you start doing things with code that has been modified, through Apache, by another contributor/committer that you have to start worrying a lot. So +1 to releasing your library,

Robots.txt parser

2004-11-11 Thread Henri Yandell
Following on from a mail on the httpclient-dev list; I'm interested in submitting a codebase of mine into Commons that parses robots.txt files. It would definitely be of use with HttpClient's future plans but I'd like to keep it stand-alone and not hidden away inside HttpClient. Is there any

Re: [Validator] Next Release

2004-11-11 Thread David Graham
--- Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I decided to have a go a resolving a couple of Struts bugs to do with bundles/resources and validator: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18169 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21760 Currently theres an

Re: Robots.txt parser

2004-11-11 Thread Craig McClanahan
As to interest, you might consider incorporating this in the httpclient project but packaging it as a separate JAR for people who want to use some other HTTP client implementation. That way the HttpClient developers could ensure that it meets your needs, without forcing users of this parser to

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/logging/optional/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging/impl WeakHashtableTest.java

2004-11-11 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2004/11/11 13:43:43 Modified:logging/optional/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl WeakHashtable.java logging/optional/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging/impl WeakHashtableTest.java Log: Updated

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32122] - Is there any way in Betwixt to validate the timestamp?

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32122] - Is there any way in Betwixt to validate the timestamp?

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32122] - Is there any way in Betwixt to validate the timestamp?

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32122] - Is there any way in Betwixt to validate the timestamp?

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32122] - Is there any way in Betwixt to validate the timestamp?

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32122] - Is there any way in Betwixt to validate the timestamp?

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/logging/optional/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging/impl WeakHashtableTest.java

2004-11-11 Thread rdonkin
rdonkin 2004/11/11 14:31:05 Modified:logging/optional/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl WeakHashtable.java logging/optional/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging/impl WeakHashtableTest.java Log: Added code to purge

Re: logging: WeakHashtable

2004-11-11 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 11 Nov 2004, at 07:40, Brian Stansberry wrote: Hi Robert, hi brian  Had a little time to look at the WeakHashtable.  Much cleaner w/o reflection! yep :)  A couple things occurred to me as I looked.   1)  The instances of Referenced are not cleared from the underlying table if their underlying

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31286] - Memory leaks in JBoss due to LogFactory cache

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31286. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31286] - Memory leaks in JBoss due to LogFactory cache

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31286. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/collections project.xml

2004-11-11 Thread scolebourne
scolebourne2004/11/11 16:02:59 Modified:collections/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/bidimap TreeBidiMap.java collections project.xml Log: Don't access static methods via instance variable from Chris Tilden Revision Changes

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/collections/src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/buffer TestBlockingBuffer.java

2004-11-11 Thread scolebourne
scolebourne2004/11/11 16:03:43 Modified:collections/src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/buffer TestBlockingBuffer.java Log: Don't access static methods via instance variable from Chris Tilden Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +4 -4

Re: [PATCH] collections: Fix static access warning in TreeBidiMap

2004-11-11 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Changes made. For future reference, it is better to attach patches to a Bugzilla call, as email messes up the patch format Thanks Stephen - Original Message - From: Chris Tilden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:43 AM Subject: [PATCH]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32133] - [lang] SystemUtils fails init on HP-UX

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32133. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/lang project.xml

2004-11-11 Thread scolebourne
scolebourne2004/11/11 16:48:41 Modified:lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang SystemUtils.java lang/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang SystemUtilsTest.java lang project.xml Log: Handle Java version with text prefix, as found on HP-UX bug 32123,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32133] - [lang] SystemUtils fails init on HP-UX

2004-11-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32133. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [jelly] Caught exception evaluating:

2004-11-11 Thread Dion Gillard
Paul, I think this would be great as a way of making Jelly 'safer'. Got a patch? On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:22:25 +0100, Paul Libbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, One of the most frustrating place in jelly, to my taste, is when a jexl exception occurs... Jelly complains (at least with good

[result][math][vote] Release 1.0-RC2

2004-11-11 Thread Phil Steitz
This vote has passed: 5 binding +1's (psteitz, brentworden, achou, yoavs, mdiggory), 1 non-binding +1 (Kim van der Linde), no +-0 or -1 votes. I will update the web site, send the RC [Announce] and prepare for 1.0 Final in two weeks. -Phil

[Announcement] Commons Math 1.0-RC2 Released

2004-11-11 Thread Phil Steitz
The Commons Math team is pleased to announce the release of Commons Math 1.0-RC2. Commons Math is a library of lightweight, self-contained mathematics and statistics components. This release candidate incorporates community feedback from 1.0-RC1. Assuming there are no problems reported with

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: FrontPage

2004-11-11 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2004-11-11T22:27:40 Editor: HenriYandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: FrontPage URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/FrontPage Proposed multidoc solution Change Log:

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: FrontPage

2004-11-11 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2004-11-11T22:28:41 Editor: HenriYandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: FrontPage URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/FrontPage no comment Change Log: -- @@ -43,7

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: FrontPage

2004-11-11 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2004-11-11T22:29:01 Editor: HenriYandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: FrontPage URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/FrontPage no comment Change Log: -- @@ -43,7

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] New: JakartaCommonsResources

2004-11-11 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2004-11-11T22:39:11 Editor: HenriYandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: JakartaCommonsResources URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsResources Books on Commons New Page: A very useful summary of articles and resources available

Re: logging: WeakHashtable

2004-11-11 Thread Brian Stansberry
--- robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11 Nov 2004, at 07:40, Brian Stansberry wrote:  A couple things occurred to me as I looked.   1)  The instances of Referenced are not cleared from the underlying table if their underlying references are cleared. 2)  Passing null keys/values to

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: JakartaCommonsResources

2004-11-11 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2004-11-11T23:06:38 Editor: HenriYandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: JakartaCommonsResources URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsResources Updated, also with my personal opinions; clearly separated. Change Log:

Re: [all] (reprise) links to books (and similar resources)

2004-11-11 Thread Henri Yandell
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsResources added. I'd like to get a breakdown of components and versions that each book cover, but it'll involve a bit of research. Alternatively, I may just define a format and then invite the authors to specify the versions etc themselves :)