RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Corey, yes you are right, main motivation is getting [email] out of sandbox :-) your #1 should be the easiest way. Btw. do you know if the JAMES-folks have a facility like dumbster? Regards, Matthias -Original Message- From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32260] - [email] byte array attachments

2004-11-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32260. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
ah, now I read the rest, well doing such a component is a nice thing. since unit-tests for [email] are a plus. well I don't know how to promote such a component to sandbox, perhaps eric knows more? I guess must post some code, that you will push to Jakarta Commons Sandbox. After that, there

Re: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Corey Scott
I have taken a quick look at Jame, maybe someone might correct me, but I cant see anything similar to this. I will be the first to admit that I am not a domain expert in this particular area, but I am definately interested and can see the use for a compact 'fake' mail server, with decent error

Re: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Serge Knystautas
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: your #1 should be the easiest way. Btw. do you know if the JAMES-folks have a facility like dumbster? Sorry, what is dumbster? -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech software . strategy . design http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Corey Scott
Serge, [Extract from the website http://quintanasoft.com/dumbster/] The Dumbster is a very simple fake SMTP server designed for unit and system testing applications that send email messages. It responds to all standard SMTP commands but does not deliver messages to the user. The messages are

Re: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Mark Lowe
Sounds like he's gonna change it anyway.. I mailed him the thread with henri's explaination and they've had a dialogue sicnce then. He said I don't have a problem changing the license. I will take a closer look at the text tomorrow and drop in the appropriate license from the choice you gave me

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Serge, http://quintanasoft.com/dumbster/ faking SMTP ;-) Regards, Matthias -Original Message- From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:54 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
yeah Mark, nice deal! I also just surfed to sf.net and figured out email-address of jasionkitchen ;-) so back to vote! ;-) -Matthias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Rory Winston
I had a peek on SF, and it looks like the developer has changed the license now: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/dumbster/dumbster/license.txt?rev=1.2view=auto Cheers, Rory Matthias Wessendorf wrote: yeah Mark, nice deal! I also just surfed to sf.net and figured out email-address of

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Rory, well the project pages tell you GPL... http://sourceforge.net/projects/dumbster/ cheers! -Original Message- From: Rory Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 2:02 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons

FW: Bugzilla buggy?

2004-11-16 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, I get the same thing, forwarding to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as instructed in the error report. Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com -Original Message- From: Shinobu Kawai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 6:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bugzilla buggy?

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Give him a couple of days to update his license and web page before we start the vote again ;) But it's sure nice to have clout when you ask people to change their license ;) Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com -Original Message- From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Promote Transaction to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Stefan Lützkendorf
+1 Stefan Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Folks, as described in previous posts and inspired by the fine proposal for email promotion I would like to see the transaction component http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/transaction/ promoted to commons proper. The initial committers would be Stefan

Re: FW: Bugzilla buggy?

2004-11-16 Thread Rory Winston
Yikes. A quick Google says that this error is: No space left on device Who's the relevant admin? Rory Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, I get the same thing, forwarding to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as instructed in the error report. Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com -Original Message- From:

RE: FW: Bugzilla buggy?

2004-11-16 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, It's [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com -Original Message- From: Rory Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:05 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: FW: Bugzilla buggy? Yikes. A quick Google

Re: [VOTE] Promote Transaction to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
also non-binding, right? On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:49:10 +0100, Stefan Lützkendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Stefan Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Folks, as described in previous posts and inspired by the fine proposal for email promotion I would like to see the transaction component

Re: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Serge Knystautas
It'd be pretty easy to have James use the Null mailet as the first (and only step) in its processing logic. This would cause James to spool the incoming messages to disk, and then always discard them. That would be a much heavier weight solution though. We use something slightly like this,

Re: logging: WeakHashtable

2004-11-16 Thread Brian Stansberry
Attached is a patch to LogFactory that attempts to play classloader tricks to prevent the hard reference problem. This is not meant to be applied; the patch is just a shorthand way to communicate ideas I'm playing with. This seemed to work in the sense that the tests I added to LogFactoryTest

Re: [VOTE] Promote Transaction to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:49:10 +0100, Stefan Lützkendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Stefan Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Folks, as described in previous posts and inspired by the fine proposal for email promotion I would like to see the transaction component

[Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: Jelly

2004-11-16 Thread commons-dev
Date: 2004-11-16T13:00:02 Editor: TorstenCurdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki Page: Jelly URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Jelly no comment Change Log: -- @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@

Re: [VOTE] Promote Transaction to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread robert burrell donkin
i like what i see but at the moment i'm +0... i'm a little uncertain whether the scope of the component has been given the thought it deserves. the description describes what's in transaction rather than the proposed scope for the component. in some ways, at the moment transaction feels like

Re: [VOTE] Promote Transaction to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
I think your request is very reasonable. However, this really is an integrated component. Both the file system and the maps rely on the locks. Compare this to e.g. http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/oswego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/intro.html where you have a similar structure for more general

Re: logging: WeakHashtable

2004-11-16 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 16 Nov 2004, at 06:12, Brian Stansberry wrote: (in general agreement) snip So, it seems like a hard reference in the map to a LogFactory is mostly a problem for webapps that include commons-logging in WEB-INF when it is already available on the server classpath. Bad practice in general to do

Re: [VOTE] Promote Transaction to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 16 Nov 2004, at 22:03, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: I think your request is very reasonable. However, this really is an integrated component. Both the file system and the maps rely on the locks. Compare this to e.g. http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/oswego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/ intro.html

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/transaction/xdocs index.xml

2004-11-16 Thread ozeigermann
ozeigermann2004/11/16 14:44:44 Modified:transaction/xdocs index.xml Log: Added scope proposal Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +28 -17jakarta-commons-sandbox/transaction/xdocs/index.xml Index: index.xml

Re: [VOTE] Promote Transaction to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
OK, I added the scope proposal to http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/transaction/ I have to admit it is somehow inspired by the scope of the concurrent package and also by Roberts sketch ;) Any objections from the other transaction guys? Thanks for pointing in that direction Robert, I

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestBaseConfigurationXMLReader.java

2004-11-16 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/11/16 16:12:05 Modified:configuration/src/test/org/apache/commons/configuration TestBaseConfigurationXMLReader.java Log: minor style fix Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +3 -3

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration ConfigurationUtils.java

2004-11-16 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/11/16 16:14:03 Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration ConfigurationUtils.java Log: getBasePath now returns null if the specified URL is null Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +6 -1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration AbstractFileConfiguration.java

2004-11-16 Thread ebourg
ebourg 2004/11/16 16:18:00 Modified:configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration AbstractFileConfiguration.java Log: The constructor AbstractFileConfiguration(String) now relies on setFileName() instead of duplicating the logic. This provides

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31797] - [configuration] Optional configurations

2004-11-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31797. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/xdocs news.xml

2004-11-16 Thread mbecke
mbecke 2004/11/16 17:43:20 Modified:httpclient/xdocs news.xml Log: added mailing list news Revision ChangesPath 1.32 +19 -4 jakarta-commons/httpclient/xdocs/news.xml Index: news.xml ===

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient release_notes.txt

2004-11-16 Thread mbecke
mbecke 2004/11/16 18:19:14 Modified:httpclient release_notes.txt Log: added the latest changes Revision ChangesPath 1.41 +11 -2 jakarta-commons/httpclient/release_notes.txt Index: release_notes.txt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31797] - [configuration] Optional configurations

2004-11-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31797. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/chain/src/java/org/apache/commons/chain/impl CatalogBase.java

2004-11-16 Thread mrdon
mrdon 2004/11/16 23:59:19 Modified:chain/src/java/org/apache/commons/chain/impl CatalogBase.java Log: Made CatalogBase thread-safe by synchronizing the map of commands PR: 32015 Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +5 -2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32015] - [chain] Make CatalogBase.getCommand() thread safe

2004-11-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32015. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.